The Risk of Heart Failure Progression in Patients With Patent Foramen Ovale: Differential Risk Associated With Device Closure

被引:3
|
作者
Park, Jiesuck [1 ,2 ]
An, Soo Yeon [3 ]
Choi, Hong-Mi [1 ,2 ]
Hwang, In -Chang [1 ,2 ]
Yoon, Yeonyee E. [1 ,2 ]
Park, Jae-Hyeong [3 ]
Cho, Goo-Yeong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Cardiovasc Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Bundang Hosp, 82 Gumi Ro 173Beon Gil, Seongnam 13620, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Internal Med, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Chungnam Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Internal Med, 282 Munhwa Ro, Daejeon 35015, South Korea
关键词
Patent foramen ovale; Device closure; Heart failure; AF = Atrial fibrillation; ATRIAL SEPTAL-DEFECT; LEFT-VENTRICULAR FAILURE; REDUCE LAP-HF; AMERICAN SOCIETY; EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION; INTERATRIAL SHUNT; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; RECOMMENDATIONS; PRESSURE; UPDATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.echo.2023.04.010
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: A patent foramen ovale (PFO) can unload left atrial pressure via an interatrial shunt. We investi-gated whether device closure of PFO is associated with a subsequent risk of heart failure (HF), particularly in patients with structural heart disease or atrial fibrillation (AF).Methods: We enrolled 4,804 consecutive patients who underwent transesophageal echocardiography at ter-tiary medical centers in Korea between 2007 and 2019. The primary outcome was the 4-year risk of HF hos-pitalization. Underlying structural heart disease was determined by echocardiography.Results: A PFO was observed in 981 (20.4%) patients, where 161 underwent device closure. During follow-up (median, 3.5 [1.4-6.4] years), the primary outcome was lower in patients with PFO than in those without (2.6% vs 4.0%; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.65; 95% CI, 0.45-0.94; P = .021). Among the patients with PFO, the primary outcome was higher in the device closure group than in the no-closure group (5.5% vs 1.2%; aHR, 5.59; 95% CI, 4.26-7.34; P < .001). A consistent result was found in patients with structural heart disease or AF (9.6% vs 3.9%; aHR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.95-3.33; P < .001), demonstrating an increased risk of the primary outcome proportionate to the number of combined structural abnormalities. However, no significant associ-ation was observed between the primary outcome and PFO closure in those without structural heart disease or AF (1.7% vs 1.5%; aHR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.99-1.50; P = .054). Conclusion: Patients with underlying structural heart disease or AF may be predisposed to symptomatic HF progression after PFO closure. Therefore, careful medical surveillance with optimal risk management is needed in these patients.
引用
收藏
页码:812 / 820
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Device Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale in Patients With Cryptogenic Stroke The Tide Has Turned
    Feldman, Dmitriy N.
    Weinberger, Jesse
    Elmariah, Sammy
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 71 (20) : 2343 - 2345
  • [22] Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale with Atriasept II device in nickel allergic patients
    Cammalleri, Valeria
    Ussia, Gian Paolo
    Marchei, Massimo
    Muscoli, Saverio
    Sergi, Domenico
    Macrini, Massimiliano
    Romeo, Francesco
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2014, 15 (04) : 350 - 352
  • [23] Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale in patients with platypnea-orthodeoxia
    Trujillo, JRO
    de Tejada, JSDH
    Quintana, AG
    Nuez, FM
    Delgado, RR
    Fernández-Aceytuno, AM
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2006, 59 (01): : 78 - 81
  • [24] Improvement in Sleep Apnea Associated With Closure of a Patent Foramen Ovale
    Silver, Brian
    Greenbaum, Adam
    McCarthy, Sharon
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SLEEP MEDICINE, 2007, 3 (03): : 295 - 296
  • [25] Association of atrial cardiopathy and residual shunt after patent foramen ovale closure in patients experiencing migraine
    Gao, Xin
    Zhang, Xinxin
    Song, Wei
    Liu, Yan
    Guo, Ran
    Jiang, Yinong
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2025, 30 (01) : 168
  • [26] Implantation of a second closure device in patients with residual shunt after percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale
    Schwerzmann, M
    Windecker, S
    Wahl, A
    Nedeltchev, K
    Mattle, HP
    Seiler, C
    Meier, B
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2004, 63 (04) : 490 - 495
  • [27] Device Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale-Is it Time to Update the Guidelines?
    Anantha-Narayanan, Mahesh
    Reddy, Yogesh N. V.
    Malik, Umair
    Allen, Jason
    Baskaran, Janani
    Bertog, Stefan
    Mbai, Mackenzi
    Garcia, Santiago
    STRUCTURAL HEART-THE JOURNAL OF THE HEART TEAM, 2019, 3 (01): : 4 - 10
  • [28] Patent Foramen Ovale and Risk of Cryptogenic Stroke - Analysis of Outcomes and Perioperative Implications
    Michel, Pablo
    Villablanca, Pedro A.
    Ranka, Sagar
    Lemor, Alejandro
    Jain, Tarun
    Ramakrishna, Harish
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2020, 34 (03) : 819 - 826
  • [29] Risk of Cerebrovascular Events in Patients With Patent Foramen Ovale and Intracardiac Devices
    Poddar, Kanhaiya L.
    Nagarajan, Vijaiganesh
    Krishnaswamy, Amar
    Bajaj, Navkaranbir S.
    Kumari, Meera
    Bdair, Hazem
    Modi, Dhruv
    Agarwal, Shikhar
    Goel, Sachin S.
    Parashar, Akhil
    Tuzcu, E. Murat
    Kapadia, Samir R.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2014, 7 (11) : 1221 - 1226
  • [30] The Heart-Brain Team Approach in Patent Foramen Ovale Closure
    Collado, Fareed Moses S.
    Kavinsky, Clifford J.
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2020, 11