Sub-watershed prioritization using morphometric analysis, principal component analysis, hypsometric analysis, land use/land cover analysis, and machine learning approaches in the Peddavagu River Basin, India

被引:8
作者
Shekar, Padala Raja [1 ]
Mathew, Aneesh [1 ]
Arun, P. S. [2 ]
Gopi, Varun P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Tiruchirappalli 620015, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Natl Inst Technol, Dept Elect & Commun Engn, Tiruchirappalli 620015, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
HA; LDA; LULC; morphometric analysis; PCA; ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; MICRO-WATERSHEDS; SUBWATERSHEDS; PARAMETERS; SYSTEM; MODEL;
D O I
10.2166/wcc.2023.221
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Water resource management is critical in the face of climate change to reduce water scarcity and meet the demands of an expanding population. Prioritization of watersheds has gained significance in natural resource management, particularly in the context of watershed management. This study prioritizes sub-watersheds for the Peddavagu basin using five methods. The four methods mentioned above can be estimated utilizing remote sensing (RS) and geographic information system (GIS) approaches, while linear discriminant analysis (LDA) is estimated using machine learning techniques. The catchment resulted in the formation of 13 sub-watersheds. The quantitative measurements of morphometric analysis, including linear, relief, and areal, were considered, and 18 morphometric characteristics were chosen to rank and prioritize sub-watersheds. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to rank and prioritize sub-watersheds based on four highly correlated morphometric parameters. The land use/land cover (LULC) analysis used four features to prioritize sub-watersheds. The LDA analysis used two features to prioritize sub-watersheds. Using hypsometric integral (HI) values, prioritization has been done. Sub-watersheds were prioritized. Based on five methods, the sub-watersheds were classified as low, medium, and high. Among the sub-watersheds identified as high priority, immediate priority is assigned to SW10. Decision-makers in the research region can use the findings to plan and implement watershed management techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:2055 / 2084
页数:30
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] Changes in watershed hydrological behavior due to land use comanagement scenarios
    Adhami, Maryam
    Sadeghi, Seyed Hamidreza
    Duttmann, Rainer
    Sheikhmohammady, Majid
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2019, 577
  • [2] Quantification of morphometric characterization and prioritization for management planning in semi-arid tropics of India: A remote sensing and GIS approach
    Aher, P. D.
    Adinarayana, J.
    Gorantiwar, S. D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2014, 511 : 850 - 860
  • [3] Morphometric Parameters-Based Prioritization of Sub-watersheds Using Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process: A Case Study of Lower Barpani Watershed, India
    Ahmed, Raihan
    Sajjad, Haroon
    Husain, Iftikhar
    [J]. NATURAL RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2018, 27 (01) : 67 - 75
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1966, MORPHOMETRY MAPS ESS
  • [5] Watershed prioritization for soil and water conservation aspect using GIS and remote sensing: PCA-based approach at northern elevated tract Bangladesh
    Arefin, Riad
    Mohir, Md Mohirul Islam
    Alam, Jahangir
    [J]. APPLIED WATER SCIENCE, 2020, 10 (04)
  • [6] Sub-basin prioritization for assessment of soil erosion susceptibility in Kangsabati, a plateau basin: A comparison between MCDM and SWAT models
    Bhattacharya, Raj Kumar
    Chatterjee, Nilanjana Das
    Das, Kousik
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 734
  • [7] Biswas MR., 2016, IOSR J Appl Geol Geophys, V4, P36, DOI [10.9790/0990-0404023641, DOI 10.9790/0990-0404023641, 10.9790/0990-0403013649, DOI 10.9790/0990-0403013649]
  • [8] Chakraborti A. K., 2003, NATL NATURAL RESOURC, P42
  • [9] Diwakar P. G., 2010, J GEOMATICS, V4, P25
  • [10] Farhan Y., 2018, Agricultural Sciences, V9, P437, DOI 10.4236/as.2018.94031