Bayesian model selection considering model complexity using stochastic filtering

被引:4
|
作者
Nasrand, MohammadAli Ameri Fard [1 ]
Mahsuli, Mojtaba [1 ]
Ghahari, S. Farid [2 ]
Taciroglu, Ertugrul [2 ]
机构
[1] Sharif Univ Technol, Ctr Infrastruct Sustainabil & Resilience Res, Dept Civil Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Los Angeles, CA USA
来源
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS | 2023年 / 52卷 / 10期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Bayesian model selection; Kalman filter; likelihood; Ockham factor; plausibility; system identification; SYSTEM-IDENTIFICATION; SEISMIC INTERFEROMETRY; MULTISTORY BUILDINGS; STRUCTURAL MODELS; MILLIKAN LIBRARY; EFFICIENT MODEL; UPDATING MODELS; DEMANDS; UNCERTAINTIES; METHODOLOGY;
D O I
10.1002/eqe.3915
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper proposes a Bayesian model selection framework to determine optimal, parsimonious models for given building structures under ground motion excitation using stochastic filtering. Structural system identification at a regional scale after an earthquake is nominally a monumental task due to its inherently high computational cost. This challenge is currently addressed in the literature by using simplified structural models that bear analytical solutions, such as Timoshenko or shear beams, and shear building models. However, a low computational effort usually leads to an increased prediction error and consequently, a higher model uncertainty. This poses the dilemma of prediction accuracy versus model complexity when selecting a model class to represent a building structure. The proposed framework selects the model class that strikes the best balance between the two. To this end, the notion of cumulative evidence is introduced here as the integral of local evidence over the ground motion duration, which is then formulated as the difference between the cumulative likelihood of the observed measurements and the cumulative penalty. The likelihood measure promotes models whose predictions better match the observations. This is counteracted by the penalty, which is devised as an "Ockham factor," and penalizes models with higher information gains due to their higher complexities, for example, a larger number of parameters. The proposed approach also yields the best tuning parameters of the stochastic filter for each model class and the best initial values of the identification parameters. The proposed framework is verified using a synthetic example, and validated using recorded data from the Millikan Library building in California and the ANX building in Japan.
引用
收藏
页码:3120 / 3148
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Bayesian Model Selection of Lithium-Ion Battery Models via Bayesian Quadrature
    Adachi, Masaki
    Kuhn, Yannick
    Horstmann, Birger
    Latz, Arnulf
    Osborne, Michael A.
    Howey, David A.
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2023, 56 (02): : 10521 - 10526
  • [32] Stochastic model updating utilizing Bayesian approach and Gaussian process model
    Wan, Hua-Ping
    Ren, Wei-Xin
    MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2016, 70-71 : 245 - 268
  • [33] Stochastic model updating for assembled structures with bolted joints using a Bayesian method
    Zhang, Yong
    Zhao, Yan
    Ouyang, Huajiang
    ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION, 2022, 54 (11) : 1919 - 1937
  • [34] Bayesian Model Selection for Longitudinal Count Data
    Ariyo, Oludare
    Lesaffre, Emmanuel
    Verbeke, Geert
    Quintero, Adrian
    SANKHYA-SERIES B-APPLIED AND INTERDISCIPLINARY STATISTICS, 2022, 84 (02): : 516 - 547
  • [35] Objective Bayesian model selection for Cox regression
    Held, Leonhard
    Gravestock, Isaac
    Bove, Daniel Sabanes
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2016, 35 (29) : 5376 - 5390
  • [36] Comparison of hypothesis testing and Bayesian model selection
    Hoijtink, Herbert
    Klugkist, Irene
    QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2007, 41 (01) : 73 - 91
  • [37] Bayesian model selection in ordinal quantile regression
    Alhamzawi, Rahim
    COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2016, 103 : 68 - 78
  • [38] Efficient Bayesian Regularization for Graphical Model Selection
    Kundu, Suprateek
    Mallick, Bani K.
    Baladandayuthapani, Veera
    BAYESIAN ANALYSIS, 2019, 14 (02): : 449 - 476
  • [39] Bayesian Model Selection and the Concentration of the Posterior of Hyperparameters
    Baldin N.
    Spokoiny V.
    Journal of Mathematical Sciences, 2014, 203 (6) : 761 - 776
  • [40] Comparison of Bayesian predictive methods for model selection
    Juho Piironen
    Aki Vehtari
    Statistics and Computing, 2017, 27 : 711 - 735