Public Gender Egalitarianism: A Dataset of Dynamic Comparative Public Opinion toward Egalitarian Gender Roles in the Public Sphere

被引:13
作者
Woo, Byung-Deuk [1 ]
Goldberg, Lindsey A. [2 ]
Solt, Frederick [3 ]
机构
[1] Pohang Univ Sci & Technol, Pohang, Gyeongbuk, South Korea
[2] Univ Florida, Gainesville, FL USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
gender roles; gender inequality; public opinion; political culture; measurement; WOMENS POLITICAL REPRESENTATION;
D O I
10.1017/S0007123422000436
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Societal attitudes toward gender roles in the workplace and politics play a central part in theorizing on the difficulty women face in achieving political equality, but shortcomings in the available data have prevented direct examination of many implications of these theories. Drawing on recent advances in latent-variable modeling of public opinion and a comprehensive collection of survey data, we present the Public Gender Egalitarianism dataset to address this need: comparable estimates of the public's attitudes on gender equality in the public sphere across more than one hundred countries over time. These Public Gender Egalitarianism scores are strongly correlated with responses to individual survey items and with women's rates of participation in the labor force and corporate boards. We expect that the Public Gender Egalitarianism data will become an invaluable source for broadly cross-national and longitudinal research on the causes and consequences of collective attitudes toward gender equality in politics and the economy.
引用
收藏
页码:766 / 775
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Measurement validity: A shared standard for qualitative and quantitative research [J].
Adcock, R ;
Collier, D .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2001, 95 (03) :529-546
[2]   Change in Women's Descriptive Representation and the Belief in Women's Ability to Govern: A Virtuous Cycle [J].
Alexander, Amy C. .
POLITICS & GENDER, 2012, 8 (04) :437-464
[3]   Defending the Realm: The Appointment of Female Defense Ministers Worldwide [J].
Barnes, Tiffany D. ;
O'Brien, Diana Z. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 62 (02) :355-368
[4]  
Burns NancyKay L. Schlozman Sidney Verba., 2001, PRIVATE ROOTS PUBLIC, DOI DOI 10.4159/9780674029088
[5]   Beyond Positive and Negative: New Perspectives on Feedback Effects in Public Opinion on the Welfare State [J].
Busemeyer, Marius R. ;
Abrassart, Aurelien ;
Nezi, Roula .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 51 (01) :137-162
[6]   Policy Ideology in European Mass Publics, 1981-2016 [J].
Caughey, Devin ;
O'Grady, Tom ;
Warshaw, Christopher .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2019, 113 (03) :674-693
[7]   Estimating Smooth Country-Year Panels of Public Opinion [J].
Claassen, Christopher .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 27 (01) :1-20
[8]   Still a 'Male Business'? Explaining Women's Presence in Executive Office [J].
Claveria, Silvia .
WEST EUROPEAN POLITICS, 2014, 37 (05) :1156-1176
[9]   Uncovering patterns among latent variables: human rights and de facto judicial independence [J].
Crabtree, Charles D. ;
Fariss, Christopher J. .
RESEARCH & POLITICS, 2015, 2 (03)
[10]   Explaining Support for Muslim Feminism in the Arab Middle East and North Africa [J].
Glas, Saskia ;
Alexander, Amy .
GENDER & SOCIETY, 2020, 34 (03) :437-466