Understanding the European Green Deal: A narrative policy framework approach

被引:22
作者
Domorenok, Ekaterina [1 ]
Graziano, Paolo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dept Polit Sci Law & Int Studies, Padua, Italy
关键词
asymmetrical intergovernmentalism; European Climate Law; European Commission; European Parliament; neofunctionalism; IDEAS; POWER; EU;
D O I
10.1002/epa2.1168
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The 2008 global financial crisis, climate change, and, ultimately, the COVID pandemic have once again challenged the European Union's (EU) capacity to find effective policy solutions to common problems. The article investigates how the novel policy narrative underpinning the European Green Deal (EGD), a new EU growth strategy aimed at transforming the EU into a fair and prosperous society with no net greenhouse gas emissions, has evolved into concrete policy commitments. By combining the theoretical insights of the narrative policy framework and the assumptions of constructivist approaches to the study of politics, we focus on the relevance of strategic narratives for the understanding of power dynamics related to the approval of the EGD' center piece-the European Climate Law. Our findings show how, by effectively using legitimacy arguments, the European Commission and the Parliament managed to secure a swift approval of the Regulation.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 29
页数:21
相关论文
共 44 条
[21]  
European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, 2021, EUR-Lex Regulation EU 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 2021 Establishing the Framework for Achieving Climate Neutrality and Amending Regulations (EC) No 401/2009 and (EU) 2018/1999 ('European Climate Law')
[22]  
Gheuens J, 2021, POLITICS GOV, V9, P337, DOI [10.17645/pag.v9i3.4320, DOI 10.17645/PAG.V9I3.4320]
[23]   Policy dismantling at EU level: Reaching the limits of 'an ever-closer ecological union'? [J].
Gravey, Viviane ;
Jordan, Andrew J. .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2020, 98 (02) :349-362
[24]   A qualitative narrative policy framework? Examining the policy narratives of US campaign finance regulatory reform [J].
Gray, Garry ;
Jones, Michael D. .
PUBLIC POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION, 2016, 31 (03) :193-220
[25]  
Jones M.D., 2014, SCI STORIES APPL NAR, DOI [DOI 10.1057/9781137485861_1, 10.1057/9781137485861, DOI 10.1057/9781137485861]
[26]  
Jordan A., 2021, ENV POLICY EU ACTORS, P402
[27]   Hypocrisy as a crisis response? Assessing changes in talk, decisions, and actions of the European Commission in EU environmental policy [J].
Knill, Christoph ;
Steinebach, Yves ;
Fernandez-i-Marin, Xavier .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2020, 98 (02) :363-377
[28]   Dismantling, disintegration or continuing stealthy integration in European Union environmental policy? [J].
Lenschow, Andrea ;
Burns, Charlotte ;
Zito, Anthony .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2020, 98 (02) :340-348
[29]   The intersection of narrative policy analysis and policy change theory [J].
McBeth, Mark K. ;
Shanahan, Elizabeth A. ;
Arnell, Ruth J. ;
Hathaway, Paul L. .
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, 2007, 35 (01) :87-108
[30]  
McBeth MarkK., 2014, THEORIES POLICY PROC, P225