Setting the programmatic agenda: A comprehensive bibliometric overview of team mechanism research

被引:5
作者
Lu, Li [1 ]
Norder, Kurt A. [2 ]
Sawhney, Aman [3 ]
Emich, Kyle J. [4 ]
机构
[1] West Chester Univ, BPM Ctr 466, Coll Business & Publ Management, Management Dept, W Chester, PA 19838 USA
[2] Univ Delaware, Alfred Lerner Coll Business & Econ, Dept Business Adm, 209 Lerner Hall, Newark, DE 19716 USA
[3] Univ Delaware, Coll Engn, Dept Comp & Informat Sci, 218 Smith Hall, Newark, DE 19716 USA
[4] Univ Delaware, Alfred Lerner Coll Business & Econ, Dept Business Adm, 319 Lerner Hall, Newark, DE 19716 USA
关键词
Team mechanisms; Team affect; Team cognition; Team processes; Bibliometric analysis; Science mapping; UPPER ECHELONS; ACADEMIC COMMUNITIES; WORK GROUPS; STRATEGY; ENTREPRENEURSHIP; ORGANIZATIONS; PERFORMANCE; PATTERNS; SCIENCE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.09.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Team mediating mechanisms are vital to team functioning as they explain how member attributes transform into collective outcomes. Yet, the field exploring them has grown vast and fragmented. This disunity indicates a lack of intellectual structure, preventing the development of general knowledge. We suggest that two aspects of this literature may contribute to this issue: its content division into affective, behavioral, cognitive, motivational, and perceptual categories, and its division into distinct scholarly communities. Using the 10,220 connected teams articles in the Scopus database, from 1952 to 2021, we present the first objective architectural map of this literature. We find that it does a good job concurrently examining different categories of mediating mechanisms, with only a few limitations. Chiefly, more research on affective team mechanisms is needed, especially considering their relationship to cognitive team mechanisms, and the top management team and sport team communities need to further integrate with other communities.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 100 条
  • [1] Aghaei Chadegani A., 2013, Asian Soc. Sci, V9, P18, DOI [10.5539/ass.v9n5p18, DOI 10.5539/ASS.V9N5P18]
  • [2] American Psychological Association, 2022, APA DICT PSYCH PERC
  • [3] A bibliometric analysis of board diversity: Current status, development, and future research directions
    Baker, H. Kent
    Pandey, Nitesh
    Kumar, Satish
    Haldar, Arunima
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2020, 108 : 232 - 246
  • [4] Bandura A., 1997, Self efficacy: The exercise of control, DOI DOI 10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158
  • [5] Group Affect
    Barsade, Sigal G.
    Knight, Andrew P.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY AND ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, VOL 2, 2015, 2 : 21 - 46
  • [6] Assessment of research fields in Scopus and Web of Science in the view of national research evaluation in Slovenia
    Bartol, Tomaz
    Budimir, Gordana
    Dekleva-Smrekar, Doris
    Pusnik, Miro
    Juznic, Primoz
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2014, 98 (02) : 1491 - 1504
  • [7] Becher T., 1989, Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual inquiry and the cultures of disciplines
  • [8] Fast unfolding of communities in large networks
    Blondel, Vincent D.
    Guillaume, Jean-Loup
    Lambiotte, Renaud
    Lefebvre, Etienne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL MECHANICS-THEORY AND EXPERIMENT, 2008,
  • [9] What's in a name? Exploring the conceptual structure of emerging organizations
    Castriotta, Manuel
    Loi, Michela
    Marku, Elona
    Naitana, Luca
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2019, 118 (02) : 407 - 437
  • [10] Extemporaneous Coordination in Specialist Teams: The Familiarity Complementarity
    Ching, Kenny
    Forti, Enrico
    Rawley, Evan
    [J]. ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2021, 32 (01) : 1 - 17