A step toward considering the return period in flood spatial modeling

被引:17
作者
Choubin, Bahram [1 ]
Hosseini, Farzaneh Sajedi [2 ]
Rahmati, Omid [3 ]
Youshanloei, Mansor Mehdizadeh [1 ]
机构
[1] AREEO, West Azarbaijan Agr & Nat Resources Res & Educ Ct, Soil Conservat & Watershed Management Res Dept, Orumiyeh, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran, Fac Nat Resources, Reclamat Arid & Mt Reg Dept, Karaj, Iran
[3] AREEO, Kurdistan Agr & Nat Resources Res & Educ Ctr, Soil Conservat & Watershed Management Res Dept, Sanandaj, Iran
关键词
Flood; Machine learning; Radar; Remote sensing; Return period; Embedded feature selection; LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY; FEATURE-SELECTION; RISK-ASSESSMENT; HEC-RAS;
D O I
10.1007/s11069-022-05561-y
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in spatial modeling, and flood hazard prediction is a major area of interest within the field of hydrology. It is necessary to consider return periods for identifying the flood hazard zones. In hydraulic modeling such as HEC-RAS, this is usually done, but in spatial modeling by machine learning (ML) models, this has not been taken into account so far. This study seeks to obtain data that will help to address this research gap. The Sentinel-1 Radar images have been used for identifying the flooded locations in different return periods. An embedded feature selection algorithm (i.e., recursive feature elimination random forest; RFE-RF) was used in the current research for key feature selection. Then, three ML models of neural networks using model averaging, classification and regression tree, and support vector machine were employed. The flood hazard prediction demonstrated a great performance for all the applied models (i.e., accuracy and precision > 90%, Kappa > 88%). Sensitivity analysis disclosed that the variables of elevation and distance from stream are in the first importance order, the variables of precipitation, slope, and land use are in the second importance order, and other variables are in the third importance order in all return periods. The modeling results indicated that among man-made land uses the irrigated area between 17.7 and 31.4%, dry farming from 0.5 to 2.4%, and residential areas between 8.3 and 25.1% are exposed to high and very high flood hazard areas. The current findings add to a growing body of literature on the spatial modeling of floods.
引用
收藏
页码:431 / 460
页数:30
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
Ahmadaali J., 2017, IRAN J SOIL WATER RE, V48, P823, DOI [10.22059/ijswr.2017.216989.667543, DOI 10.22059/IJSWR.2017.216989.667543]
[2]   Susceptibility to Gully Erosion: Applying Random Forest (RF) and Frequency Ratio (FR) Approaches to a Small Catchment in Ethiopia [J].
Amare, Selamawit ;
Langendoen, Eddy ;
Keesstra, Saskia ;
Ploeg, Martine van der ;
Gelagay, Habtamu ;
Lemma, Hanibal ;
van der Zee, Sjoerd E. A. T. M. .
WATER, 2021, 13 (02)
[3]   A TEST OF GOODNESS OF FIT [J].
ANDERSON, TW ;
DARLING, DA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1954, 49 (268) :765-769
[4]  
Bayik C, 2018, INT ARCH PHOTOGRAMM, V42/3, P109, DOI [10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-3-w4-109-2018, 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W4-109-2018]
[5]   Spatiotemporal floodplain mapping and prediction using HEC-RAS - GIS tools: Case of the Mejerda river, Tunisia [J].
Ben Khalfallah, C. ;
Saidi, S. .
JOURNAL OF AFRICAN EARTH SCIENCES, 2018, 142 :44-51
[6]  
Beven K.J., 1979, HYDROL SCI B, V24, P43, DOI [10.1080/02626667909491834, DOI 10.1080/02626667909491834]
[7]  
Bishop CM, 2013, ARXIV
[8]   Operational Flood Detection Using Sentinel-1 SAR Data over Large Areas [J].
Cao, Han ;
Zhang, Hong ;
Wang, Chao ;
Zhang, Bo .
WATER, 2019, 11 (04)
[9]   Flood-prone area mapping using machine learning techniques: a case study of Quang Binh province, Vietnam [J].
Chinh Luu ;
Quynh Duy Bui ;
Costache, Romulus ;
Luan Thanh Nguyen ;
Thu Thuy Nguyen ;
Tran Van Phong ;
Hiep Van Le ;
Binh Thai Pham .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2021, 108 (03) :3229-3251
[10]   Multi-temporal synthetic aperture radar flood mapping using change detection [J].
Clement, M. A. ;
Kilsby, C. G. ;
Moore, P. .
JOURNAL OF FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT, 2018, 11 (02) :152-168