Long-term results of minimally invasive transanal surgery for rectal tumors in 249 consecutive patients

被引:4
作者
Maeda, Kotaro [1 ]
Koide, Yoshikazu [2 ]
Katsuno, Hidetoshi [3 ]
Tajima, Yosuke [2 ]
Hanai, Tsunekazu [2 ]
Masumori, Koji [2 ]
Matsuoka, Hiroshi [2 ]
Shiota, Miho [4 ]
机构
[1] Med Corp, Dept Surg, Kenikukai Shonan Keiiku Hosp, 4360 Endo, Fujisawa, Kanagawa 2520816, Japan
[2] Fujita Hlth Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Toyoake, Aichi 4701192, Japan
[3] Fujita Hlth Univ, Dept Surg, Okazaki Med Ctr, Okazaki, Aichi 4440827, Japan
[4] Kaisei Hosp, Dept Surg, Sakaide 6570068, Japan
关键词
Local excision; Transanal surgery; Minimally invasive transanal surgery; Rectal cancer; Rectal tumor; CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES; ENDOSCOPIC MICROSURGERY; LOCAL EXCISION; RADICAL RESECTION; CANCER; RISK; ADENOCARCINOMA; MANAGEMENT; METAANALYSIS; RECURRENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s00595-022-02570-z
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose To delineate the long-term results of minimally invasive transanal surgery (MITAS) for selected rectal tumors. Methods We analyzed data, retrospectively, on consecutive patients who underwent MITAS between 1995 and 2015, to establish the feasibility, excision quality, and perioperative and oncological outcomes of this procedure. Results MITAS was performed on 243 patients. The final histology included 142 cancers, 47 adenomas, and 52 neuroendocrine tumors (NET G1). A positive margin of 1.6% and 100% en bloc resection were achieved. The mean operative time was 27.4 min. Postoperative morbidity occurred in 7% of patients, with 0% mortality. The median follow-up was 100 months (up to >= 5 years or until death in 91.8% of patients). Recurrence developed in 2.9% of the patients. The 10-year overall survival rate was 100% for patients with NET G1 and 80.3% for those with cancer. The 5-year DFS was 100% for patients with Tis cancer, 90.6% for those with T1 cancer, and 87.5% for those with T2 or deeper cancers. MITAS for rectal tumors >= 3 cm resulted in perioperative and oncologic outcomes equivalent to those for tumors < 3 cm. Conclusion MITAS is feasible for the local excision (LE) of selected rectal tumors, including tumors >= 3 cm. It reduces operative time and secures excision quality and long-term oncological outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:306 / 315
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Local excision for early rectal cancer: transanal endoscopic microsurgery and beyond [J].
Althumairi, Azah A. ;
Gearhart, Susan L. .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 6 (03) :296-306
[2]   Systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus transanal endoscopic microsurgery for large noninvasive rectal lesions [J].
Arezzo, Alberto ;
Passera, Roberto ;
Saito, Yutaka ;
Sakamoto, Taku ;
Kobayashi, Nozomu ;
Sakamoto, Naoto ;
Yoshida, Naohisa ;
Naito, Yuji ;
Fujishiro, Mitsuhiro ;
Niimi, Keiko ;
Ohya, Tomohiko ;
Ohata, Ken ;
Okamura, Shinichi ;
Iizuka, Shinei ;
Takeuchi, Yoji ;
Uedo, Noriya ;
Fusaroli, Pietro ;
Bonino, Marco Augusto ;
Verra, Mauro ;
Morino, Mario .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2014, 28 (02) :427-438
[3]   Local excision for T1 rectal tumours: are we getting better? [J].
Atallah, C. ;
Taylor, J. P. ;
Lo, B. D. ;
Stem, M. ;
Brocke, T. ;
Efron, J. E. ;
Safar, B. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2020, 22 (12) :2038-2048
[4]   Transanal endoscopic microsurgery in 143 consecutive patients with rectal adenocarcinoma: results from a Danish multicenter study [J].
Baatrup, G. ;
Breum, B. ;
Qvist, N. ;
Wille-Jorgensen, P. ;
Elbrond, H. ;
Moller, P. ;
Hesselfeldt, P. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2009, 11 (03) :270-275
[5]   A predictive model for local recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer [J].
Bach, S. P. ;
Hill, J. ;
Monson, J. R. T. ;
Simson, J. N. L. ;
Lane, L. ;
Merrie, A. ;
Warren, B. ;
Mortensens, N. J. McC. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 96 (03) :280-290
[6]   Systematic review and meta-analysis of histopathological factors influencing the risk of lymph node metastasis in early colorectal cancer [J].
Beaton, C. ;
Twine, C. P. ;
Williams, G. L. ;
Radcliffe, A. G. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2013, 15 (07) :788-797
[7]   Rectal Cancer, Version 2.2018 Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology [J].
Benson, Al B., III ;
Venook, Alan P. ;
Al-Hawary, Mahmoud M. ;
Cederquist, Lynette ;
Chen, Yi-Jen ;
Ciombor, Kristen K. ;
Cohen, Stacey ;
Cooper, Harry S. ;
Deming, Dustin ;
Engstrom, Paul F. ;
Grem, Jean L. ;
Grothey, Axel ;
Hochster, Howard S. ;
Hoffe, Sarah ;
Hunt, Steven ;
Kamel, Ahmed ;
Kirilcuk, Natalie ;
Krishnamurthi, Smitha ;
Messersmith, Wells A. ;
Meyerhardt, Jeffrey ;
Mulcahy, Mary F. ;
Murphy, James D. ;
Nurkin, Steven ;
Saltz, Leonard ;
Sharma, Sunil ;
Shibata, David ;
Skibber, John M. ;
Sofocleous, Constantinos T. ;
Stoffel, Elena M. ;
Stotsky-Himelfarb, Eden ;
Willett, Christopher G. ;
Wuthrick, Evan ;
Gregory, Kristina M. ;
Gurski, Lisa ;
Freedman-Cass, Deborah A. .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2018, 16 (07) :874-901
[8]   T1 adenocarcinoma of the rectum - Transanal excision or radical surgery? [J].
Bentrem, DJ ;
Okabe, S ;
Wong, WD ;
Guillem, JG ;
Weiser, MR ;
Temple, LK ;
Ben-Porat, LS ;
Minsky, BD ;
Cohen, AM ;
Paty, PB .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2005, 242 (04) :472-479
[9]   Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery Versus Conventional Transanal Excision for Patients With Early Rectal Cancer [J].
Christoforidis, Dimitrios ;
Cho, Hyeon-Min ;
Dixon, Matthew R. ;
Mellgren, Anders F. ;
Madoff, Robert D. ;
Finne, Charles O. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2009, 249 (05) :776-782
[10]   Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery Versus Standard Transanal Excision for the Removal of Rectal Neoplasms: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Clancy, Cillian ;
Burke, John P. ;
Albert, Mathew R. ;
O'Connell, P. Ronan ;
Winter, Desmond C. .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2015, 58 (02) :254-261