Management for Benign Ureteral Stricture: Comparison of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopy, Conventional Laparoscopy, and Balloon Dilation

被引:3
作者
Zi, Dong [1 ]
Cao, Wentao [1 ]
Chen, Fang [1 ]
Zhu, Liang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 2, Dept Urol, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 2, Dept Urol, 139 Renming Rd, Changsha 410011, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
robotic; laparoscopy; balloon dilation; ureteral stricture; JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION; PYELOPLASTY; DILATATION; REPAIR; REIMPLANTATION;
D O I
10.1089/end.2023.0047
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Robot-assisted laparoscopy (RALP), conventional laparoscopy (LP), and balloon dilation (BD) have all been identified as common treatments for benign ureteral stricture (BUS). The purpose of the research would be to compare the safety and efficacy differences in the three groups.Patients and Methods: Patients who received RALP, LP, or BD for BUS were studied retrospectively from January 2016 through December 2020. Professional and experienced surgeons performed all operations. We collect and analyze baseline characteristics, stricture details, and perioperative and follow-up information.Results: The results showed no statistically significant difference between the three groups for baseline characteristics and stricture details. No statistical difference was also found between RALP and LP in specific surgical techniques. The average operative time was longer in the LP group than RALP and BD groups (178 minutes vs 150 minutes vs 67 minutes, respectively, p < 0.001). BD had lower estimated blood loss than RALP and LP (14 mL vs 40 mL vs 32 mL, p < 0.001) and similar between the RALP and LP groups (p = 0.238). The BD group had the shortest postoperative hospital stay compared with the RALP and LP groups (2.95 days vs 5.25 days vs 6.52 days, p < 0.001), and no statistically significant difference existed between the RALP and LP groups (p = 0.098). RALP had considerably greater hospitalization expenses than both LP (p < 0.001) and BD (p < 0.001). Complications and short-term success rates (6 months) were similar. The BD group had poorer long-term success (12 and 24 months) than the RALP and LP groups, whereas there was no statistically significant difference between the RALP and LP groups.Conclusions: For the management of BUS, RALP, LP, and BD are all safe and effective, with equivalent complication rates and short-term success. In long-term success rates, BD is low than RALP and LP.
引用
收藏
页码:868 / 875
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Retrograde balloon cautery incision of ureteropelvic junction obstruction
    Aslan, P
    Preminger, GM
    [J]. UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1998, 25 (02) : 295 - +
  • [2] Robot-assisted and Laparoscopic Repair of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Autorino, Riccardo
    Eden, Christopher
    El-Ghoneimi, Alaa
    Guazzoni, Giorgio
    Buffi, Nicolomaria
    Peters, Craig A.
    Stein, Robert J.
    Gettman, Matthew
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 65 (02) : 430 - 452
  • [3] Complete daVinciTM versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty:: Cost analysis
    Bhayani, SB
    Link, RE
    Varkarakis, JM
    Kavoussi, LR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2005, 19 (03) : 327 - 332
  • [4] Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Robotic-Assisted versus Conventional Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Patients with Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction: Effect on Operative Time, Length of Hospital Stay, Postoperative Complications, and Success Rate
    Braga, Luis H. P.
    Pace, Kenneth
    DeMaria, Jorge
    Lorenzo, Armando J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 56 (05) : 848 - 857
  • [5] Comparing open and pneumovesical approach for ureteric reimplantation in pediatric patients-a preliminary review
    Chung, Patrick Ho Yu
    Tang, Dorothy Yuen Yee
    Wong, Kenneth Kar Yuen
    Yip, Peter Kam Fai
    Tam, Paul Kwong Hang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2008, 43 (12) : 2246 - 2249
  • [7] Robotic Repair of Ureteral Strictures: Techniques and Review
    Elbers, Javier Reinoso
    Rodriguez Socarras, Moises
    Rivas, Juan Gomez
    Autran, Ana Maria
    Esperto, Francesco
    Tortolero, Leonardo
    Carrion, Diego M.
    Sancha, Fernando Gomez
    [J]. CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2021, 22 (08)
  • [8] Engelsgjerd JS, 2022, Ureteral Injury. StatPearls.
  • [9] Robotic versus laparoscopic ureteroplasty with a lingual mucosa graft for complex ureteral stricture
    Fan, Shubo
    Li, Zhihua
    Meng, Chang
    Ying, Yicen
    Han, Guanpeng
    Gao, Jingjing
    Li, Xinfei
    Wang, Jie
    Yuan, Changwei
    Xiong, Shengwei
    Zhang, Peng
    Yang, Kunlin
    Feng, Ninghan
    Zhu, Hongjian
    Li, Xuesong
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2023, 55 (03) : 597 - 604
  • [10] Fasihuddin Q, 2001, J Pak Med Assoc, V51, P351