First and last and always: Politics of the 'energy efficiency first' principle in EU energy and climate policy

被引:20
作者
von Malmborg, Fredrik [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Dept Management & Engn, Div Polit Sci, Linkoping, Sweden
[2] Linkoping Univ, Dept Management & Engn, SE-58183 Linkoping, Sweden
关键词
Discourse analysis; Climate policy; Energy efficiency; Energy efficiency first; Energy policy; EU policy; DISCOURSE ANALYSIS; COALITIONS; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.erss.2023.103126
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The EU legislators have agreed that the 'energy efficiency first' (EE1) principle is made legally binding for Member States, to apply in policy, planning and major investment decisions. Through the EE1 principle, energy efficiency is to be made a priority in European Union (EU) energy and climate policy, providing what has been a missing link in fully implementing two other guiding principles of EU energy and climate policy: costeffectiveness and consumer protection. In this article, I conduct an argumentative discourse analysis to better understand the politics of the EE1 principle in EU energy and climate policy. Two different discourses with a set of storylines were identified in the negotiations on the EE1 principle. The first focuses on multiple benefits of energy efficiency and a stronger role for the EE1 principle. The other focuses on climate change mitigation and a weaker role for the EE1 principle. The Council Presidency and the European Commission used discursive techniques such as frame polarisation, frame disconnection and frame incorporation to overcome these dualities. The description of storylines, discourse coalitions and discursive interaction strategies can help policymakers and other stakeholders become more aware of their own and others' argumentation on energy efficiency and how these could be changed, thus help policymakers and stakeholders better shape their strategies in future advocacy and policymaking.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Commission Recommendation on a common approach to establish a systematic surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 and its variants in wastewaters in the EU
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2021, EUROPEAN COMMISSION Assessment of Hydrogen Delivery Options Context
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Communication on the short-term resilience of the European gas system, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
[4]  
Bayer E., 2015, EFFICIENCY 1 KEY POI
[5]   Co-decision after Lisbon: The politics of informal trilogues in European Union lawmaking [J].
Brandsma, Gijs Jan .
EUROPEAN UNION POLITICS, 2015, 16 (02) :300-319
[6]   Energy-efficiency skeptics and advocates: the debate heats up as the stakes rise [J].
Brown, Marilyn A. ;
Wang, Yu .
ENERGY EFFICIENCY, 2017, 10 (05) :1155-1173
[7]   Discourse coalitions and the Australian climate change policy network [J].
Bulkeley, H .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 2000, 18 (06) :727-748
[8]  
Buonocore JJ, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P100, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE2771, 10.1038/nclimate2771]
[9]   How first comes energy efficiency? Assessing the energy efficiency first principle in the EU using a comprehensive indicator-based approach [J].
Chlechowitz, Mara ;
Reuter, Matthias ;
Eichhammer, Wolfgang .
ENERGY EFFICIENCY, 2022, 15 (08)
[10]   Shale gas policy in the United Kingdom: An argumentative discourse analysis [J].
Cotton, Matthew ;
Rattle, Imogen ;
Van Alstine, James .
ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 73 :427-438