Experiences of using artificial intelligence in healthcare: a qualitative study of UK clinician and key stakeholder perspectives

被引:13
作者
Fazakarley, C. A. [1 ]
Breen, Maria [2 ,3 ]
Leeson, Paul [4 ]
Thompson, Ben [1 ]
Williamson, Victoria [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Ultromics Ltd, Oxford, England
[2] Univ Reading, Sch Psychol & Clin Language Sci, Reading, England
[3] Breen Clin Res, London, England
[4] Univ Oxford, Div Cardiovasc Med, Oxford, England
[5] Kings Coll London, London, England
[6] Univ Oxford, Expt Psychol, Oxford, England
关键词
clinical decision-making; qualitative research; quality in health care; INTERVIEW; AI;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076950
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives Artificial intelligence (AI) is a rapidly developing field in healthcare, with tools being developed across various specialties to support healthcare professionals and reduce workloads. It is important to understand the experiences of professionals working in healthcare to ensure that future AI tools are acceptable and effectively implemented. The aim of this study was to gain an in-depth understanding of the experiences and perceptions of UK healthcare workers and other key stakeholders about the use of AI in the National Health Service (NHS).Design A qualitative study using semistructured interviews conducted remotely via MS Teams. Thematic analysis was carried out.Setting NHS and UK higher education institutes.Participants Thirteen participants were recruited, including clinical and non-clinical participants working for the NHS and researchers working to develop AI tools for healthcare settings.Results Four core themes were identified: positive perceptions of AI; potential barriers to using AI in healthcare; concerns regarding AI use and steps needed to ensure the acceptability of future AI tools. Overall, we found that those working in healthcare were generally open to the use of AI and expected it to have many benefits for patients and facilitate access to care. However, concerns were raised regarding the security of patient data, the potential for misdiagnosis and that AI could increase the burden on already strained healthcare staff.Conclusion This study found that healthcare staff are willing to engage with AI research and incorporate AI tools into care pathways. Going forward, the NHS and AI developers will need to collaborate closely to ensure that future tools are suitable for their intended use and do not negatively impact workloads or patient trust. Future AI studies should continue to incorporate the views of key stakeholders to improve tool acceptability.Trial registration number NCT05028179; ISRCTN15113915; IRAS ref: 293515.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Patient Perceptions on Data Sharing and Applying Artificial Intelligence to Health Care Data: Cross-sectional Survey [J].
Aggarwal, Ravi ;
Farag, Soma ;
Martin, Guy ;
Ashrafian, Hutan ;
Darzi, Ara .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (08)
[2]   Evaluation of a real-time computer-aided polyp detection system during screening colonoscopy: AI-DETECT study [J].
Ahmad, Ahmir ;
Wilson, Ana ;
Haycock, Adam ;
Humphries, Adam ;
Monahan, Kevin ;
Suzuki, Noriko ;
Thomas-Gibson, Siwan ;
Vance, Margaret ;
Bassett, Paul ;
Thiruvilangam, Kowshika ;
Dhillon, Angad ;
Saunders, Brian P. .
ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 55 (04) :313-319
[3]   Artificial intelligence (AI) healthcare technology innovations: the current state and challenges from a life science industry perspective [J].
Apell, Petra ;
Eriksson, Henrik .
TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2023, 35 (02) :179-193
[4]   Utopia versus dystopia: Professional perspectives on the impact of healthcare artificial intelligence on clinical roles and skills [J].
Aquino, Yves Saint James ;
Rogers, Wendy A. ;
Braunack-Mayer, Annette ;
Frazer, Helen ;
Win, Khin Than ;
Houssami, Nehmat ;
Degeling, Christopher ;
Semsarian, Christopher ;
Carter, Stacy M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2023, 169
[5]   The promise of artificial intelligence: a review of the opportunities and challenges of artificial intelligence in healthcare [J].
Aung, Yuri Y. M. ;
Wong, David C. S. ;
Ting, Daniel S. W. .
BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2021, 139 (01) :4-15
[6]   Mobile healthcare applications: system design review, critical issues and challenges [J].
Baig, Mirza Mansoor ;
GholamHosseini, Hamid ;
Connolly, Martin J. .
AUSTRALASIAN PHYSICAL & ENGINEERING SCIENCES IN MEDICINE, 2015, 38 (01) :23-38
[7]   Artificial intelligence and the future of psychiatry: Qualitative findings from a global physician survey [J].
Blease, C. ;
Locher, C. ;
Leon-Carlyle, M. ;
Doraiswamy, M. .
DIGITAL HEALTH, 2020, 6
[8]  
Braun V, 2006, Qualitative Research in Psychology, V3, P77, DOI [10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, DOI 10.1080/10875549.2021.1929659]
[9]   Email consultations in health care: 2-acceptability and safe application [J].
Car, J ;
Sheikh, A .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 329 (7463) :439-+
[10]   Convolutional Neural Network Technology in Endoscopic Imaging: Artificial Intelligence for Endoscopy [J].
Choi, Joonmyeong ;
Shin, Keewon ;
Jung, Jinhoon ;
Bae, Hyun-Jin ;
Kim, Do Hoon ;
Byeon, Jeong-Sik ;
Kim, Namkug .
CLINICAL ENDOSCOPY, 2020, 53 (02) :117-126