Administrative Dashboard for Monitoring Use of a Web-Based Parent Training Intervention: Usability Study

被引:0
作者
Breitenstein, Susan M. [1 ,3 ]
Berteletti, Julia [2 ]
Smoske, Shea [1 ]
Barger, Charles [2 ]
Tipps, Kyrie [1 ]
Helsabeck, Nathan P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Coll Nursing, Columbus, OH USA
[2] Klein Buendel Inc, Golden, CO USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Coll Nursing, 1577 Neil Ave, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
usability; development; dashboard; portal; implementation; design; System Usability Scale; internet-based intervention; parents; parent; child; children; web-based; web-based parent training; PT; descriptive survey; single group; survey; system usability; ezParent; videoconference; information; reviews on usage; improvement; qualitative; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; DIGITAL DELIVERY; PROGRAM; ENGAGEMENT; OUTCOMES; HOME;
D O I
10.2196/53439
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Web -based parent training (PT) programs can strengthen parent -child relationships by equipping caregivers with knowledge and evidence -based strategies to manage behavior. Hybrid facilitation of PT includes facilitator interaction paired with self-administered and web -based PT. Web -based administrative dashboards provide users (eg, administrators, facilitators, and researchers) with an integrated platform to monitor parent progress and activities within a PT program or website. Despite the utility and prevalence of administrative dashboards for web -based behavioral interventions, to our knowledge, no research studies have explored the perspectives and insights of dashboard users to enhance user experience and program delivery. Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the usability of the administrative dashboard (ezDashboard) for the ezParent program, a 6 -module web -based PT program for parents of children aged 2-5 years. Methods: This study used a descriptive, single -group design with administrators who were overseeing the implementation of the ezParent program and trained facilitators for hybrid ezParent delivery. Participants spent at least 30 minutes reviewing and evaluating the ezDashboard and then completed a survey of their experience with the dashboard. The survey included the validated 10 -item System Usability Scale and open-ended questions focusing on user performance, navigation ease, and overall usefulness of the ezDashboard. Results: Participants (N=15) indicated high usability of the ezDashboard with System Usability Scale scoring a total mean score of 83.5 (SD 16.3). Most participants (n=13, 87%) rated the overall user -friendliness of the ezDashboard as good (n=3, 20%), excellent (n=9, 60%), or best imaginable (n=1, 7%). Open-ended questions revealed the ezDashboard is or would be useful to monitor parent progress and trends in engagement (n=8, 53%) and for reviewing topics for discussion and communicating with parents (n=5, 33%). ezParent administrators (n=4) identified that real-time data for ezParent use helps overall management of program uptake. Suggestions for features to add to the ezDashboard included the ability to track partial progress of program modules (4/14, 29%), total time spent per module (2/14, 14%), and exportable reports (4/14, 29%). Other ideas for improvement included direct messaging capabilities, videoconferencing platform integration, and being able to modify participant account and contact information. Conclusions: Results indicate that the ezDashboard is easy to use and provides functional information to facilitators and administrators in delivering ezParent. Qualitative results indicate that integrating suggested features into the ezDashboard may help provide a smoother experience for facilitators, administrators, and ultimately the parents using the program. Providing resources for facilitators and administrators in real time to monitor intervention participants' progress in a program can be helpful in tracking progress and providing facilitated support in tailoring program content and program completion.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] More than just tracking time: Complex measures of user engagement with an internet-based health promotion intervention
    Baltierra, Nina B.
    Muessig, Kathryn E.
    Pike, Emily C.
    LeGrand, Sara
    Bull, Sheana S.
    Hightow-Weidman, Lisa B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2016, 59 : 299 - 307
  • [2] An empirical evaluation of the System Usability Scale
    Bangor, Aaron
    Kortum, Philip T.
    Miller, James T.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2008, 24 (06) : 574 - 594
  • [3] Bangor A, 2009, J USABILITY STUD, V4, P114
  • [4] The Effectiveness of Parenting Programs: A Review of Campbell Reviews
    Barlow, Jane
    Coren, Esther
    [J]. RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2018, 28 (01) : 99 - 102
  • [5] Parent training programs for preventing and treating antisocial behavior in children and adolescents: A comprehensive meta-analysis of international studies
    Beelmann, Andreas
    Arnold, Louisa S.
    Hercher, Judith
    [J]. AGGRESSION AND VIOLENT BEHAVIOR, 2023, 68
  • [6] Belden J.L., 2009, Defining and testing EMR usability: Principles and proposed methods of EMR usability evaluation and rating
  • [7] Braun V., 2006, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, V3, P77, DOI [DOI 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238, 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]
  • [8] A Randomized Trial of Digitally Delivered, Self-Administered Parent Training in Primary Care: Effects on Parenting and Child Behavior
    Breitenstein, Susan M.
    Fehrenbacher, Caitlin
    Holod, Alicia F.
    Schoeny, Michael E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2021, 231 : 207 - +
  • [9] Engagement and Adherence With ezPARENT, an mHealth Parent-Training Program Promoting Child Well-Being
    Breitenstein, Susan M.
    Brager, Jenna
    Ocampo, Edith V.
    Fogg, Louis
    [J]. CHILD MALTREATMENT, 2017, 22 (04) : 295 - 304
  • [10] Parent Use and Efficacy of a Self-Administered, Tablet-Based Parent Training Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Breitenstein, Susan M.
    Fogg, Louis
    Ocampo, Edith V.
    Acosta, Diana I.
    Gross, Deborah
    [J]. JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2016, 4 (02): : 536 - 549