Improved Cross Entropy Method for Well-Being Evaluation of Composite Generation and Transmission Systems

被引:0
|
作者
Xu, Dongli [1 ]
Wang, Yuqi [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Fang [1 ]
Chen, Fan [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Inst Technol, Sch Elect Power Engn, Nanjing 211167, Peoples R China
[2] State Grid Jiangsu Elect Power Co Ltd, Nanjing Gaochun Dist Power Supply Branch, Nanjing 211300, Peoples R China
关键词
Indexes; Convergence; Power systems; Reliability; Random variables; Uncertainty; Probability density function; Entropy; Power system reliability; Performance evaluation; Well-being evaluation; composite generation and transmission systems; convergence of risk index and marginal index; cross entropy; optimal multiplier; RELIABILITY EVALUATION; RESERVE;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3313175
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Well-Being analysis is an approach that integrates deterministic criteria with probabilistic methods, and it plays a crucial role in the operational planning of power systems. However, assessing the Well-Being of composite generation and transmission systems presents a formidable challenge, characterized by significant computational burdens and sluggish processing speeds. To tackle this issue, we embarked on an effort to enhance the computational efficiency of Well-Being assessment by employing the cross-entropy method (CEM). Nonetheless, our experimental pursuits revealed that the conventional employment of CEM for Well-Being assessment can lead to protracted convergence of the marginal index. To overcome this limitation, we introduce an enhanced multi-objective cross-entropy method (MCEM) that integrates weight factors, thereby ensuring an accelerated convergence rate for both the risk and marginal indices. To validate the effectiveness and advancement of our proposed MCEM approach, we conduct a comprehensive comparative analysis using the IEEE RTS79 and MRTS79 test systems as case studies. We contrast our method with the conventional MCS and CEM approaches, conducting a thorough examination of the computational performance of MCEM. This comprehensive comparative study unequivocally confirms the efficacy and progressive nature of the MCEM framework presented in this paper.
引用
收藏
页码:97735 / 97744
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] EVALUATION OF FETAL WELL-BEING BY ULTRASONOGRAPHY
    WADE, RV
    ALABAMA JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 1985, 22 (01): : 30 - 33
  • [22] An evaluation of the choices for well-being project
    Maguire, Nick
    Hughes, Vera Christina
    Bell, Louise
    Bogosian, Angeliki
    Hepworth, Claire
    PSYCHOLOGY HEALTH & MEDICINE, 2014, 19 (03) : 303 - 315
  • [23] Well-Being Impact on Banking Systems
    Iuga, Iulia Cristina
    Dragolea, Larisa-Loredana
    JOURNAL OF RISK AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 14 (03)
  • [24] AN EVALUATION OF SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING MEASURES
    LARSEN, RJ
    DIENER, E
    EMMONS, RA
    SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 1985, 17 (01) : 1 - 17
  • [25] Party systems and human well-being
    Mukherjee, Nisha
    PARTY POLITICS, 2013, 19 (04) : 601 - 623
  • [26] A System-of-Systems Framework for Improved Human, Ecologic and Economic Well-Being
    Genaidy, Ash M.
    Huston, Ronald L.
    Dionysiou, Dionysios D.
    Karwowski, Waldemar
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (04):
  • [27] WELL-BEING ANALYSIS OF MICROGRID WITH GENERATION SCHEDULING
    Topno, Nutan
    Prakash, Prem
    Jha, R. C.
    2018 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON POWER, ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT: TOWARDS SMART TECHNOLOGY (ICEPE), 2018,
  • [28] EVALUATION OF A SIMPLE METHOD TO ASSESS FETAL WELL-BEING IN ANTENATAL CLINIC
    MONTAN, S
    ARULKUMARAN, S
    RATNAM, SS
    JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 1994, 22 (03) : 175 - 180
  • [29] Psychosocial Well-Being An exploratory cross-sectional evaluation of loneliness, anxiety,
    Phillips, Carolyn S.
    Becker, Heather
    Gonzalez, Emily
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2021, 25 (05) : 530 - 538
  • [30] Evaluation of the Miami Child Well-Being Court Model: Safety, Permanency, and Well-Being Findings
    Casanueva, Cecilia
    Fraser, Jenifer Goldman
    Gilbert, Adrianne
    Maze, Candice
    Katz, Lynne
    Ullery, Mary Ann
    Stacks, Ann M.
    Lederman, Cindy
    CHILD WELFARE, 2013, 92 (03) : 73 - 96