Assessing and comparing the subseasonal variations of summer soil moisture of satellite products over eastern China

被引:2
作者
Zhou, Yang [1 ]
Chen, Haishan [1 ]
Sun, Shanlei [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Forecast & Evaluat Meteorol, Key Lab Meteorol Disaster, Minist Educ, Nanjing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
eastern China; satellite; soil moisture; subseasonal to seasonal; SMAP; PRECIPITATION; RETRIEVALS; SMOS; INITIALIZATION; VARIABILITY; SENSITIVITY; VALIDATION; VEGETATION; NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1002/joc.8073
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Using the 43-station soil moisture (SM) at a depth of 0-10 cm over eastern China, the near-surface (about 0-5 cm) SM products from satellite missions including the level-2 product of Chinese FengYun 3C (FY3C), level-2 neural network product of the European Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) and level-4 product of the US Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) were evaluated and compared during summers of 2015-2018. Thus, features of those products can be identified for their further application of climate study over eastern China. Large diversity is found among the satellite and field SM in terms of spatial distribution. This disagreement may cause the poor performance of the relationship between spatial coefficients of variation (CV) and mean SM. Compared with the field SM, the FY3C SM has smaller bias than the other satellite products. FY3C also performs better than SMOS in terms of the root-mean-square error (RMSE) and unbiased RMSE (ubRMSE) but has the smallest correlation coefficient (R). The SMAP product is generally the best among the three products in terms of RMSE, ubRMSE and R. However, a good performance in those metrics does not guarantee the same results on various time scales. On subseasonal time scales, the R in FY3C is the smallest among the three products, and the SMAP product has the largest R, but its amplitudes of the subseasonal variations are much smaller than the field observations. This indicates that when the SMAP products are applied for the analysis on subseasonal SM-atmosphere interactions, the effects of SM may be underestimated. On 10-30 days and above 60 days, dry period tends to have large spatial CV but this phenomenon is weak in all the satellite products. On the other hand, dry area tends to have large temporal CV on the four time scales, and this relationship is the strongest in SMAP but the weakest in FY3C. Therefore, there are large uncertainties of variability among different satellite SM products on subseasonal time scales over eastern China. Besides seasonal and overall performance, more attention is called to the variations on different time scales.
引用
收藏
页码:3925 / 3946
页数:22
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [1] Ahmad A., 2011, SPIE REV, V2011
  • [2] Evaluation of SMOS Soil Moisture Products Over Continental US Using the SCAN/SNOTEL Network
    Al Bitar, Ahmad
    Leroux, Delphine
    Kerr, Yann H.
    Merlin, Olivier
    Richaume, Philippe
    Sahoo, Alok
    Wood, Eric F.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2012, 50 (05): : 1572 - 1586
  • [3] Evaluation of remotely sensed and modelled soil moisture products using global ground-based in situ observations
    Albergel, Clement
    de Rosnay, Patricia
    Gruhier, Claire
    Munoz-Sabater, Joaquin
    Hasenauer, Stefan
    Isaksen, Lars
    Kerr, Yann
    Wagner, Wolfgang
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 118 : 215 - 226
  • [4] Monsoon intraseasonal oscillation and land-atmosphere interaction in an idealized model
    Bellon, Gilles
    [J]. CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2011, 37 (5-6) : 1081 - 1096
  • [5] Development of a soil moisture analysis for subseasonal forecasting: Soil moisture validation
    Boisserie, M. .
    Cocke, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2012, 117
  • [6] Butterworth S., 1930, EXPT WIRELESS WIRELE, V7, P536
  • [7] Development and assessment of the SMAP enhanced passive soil moisture product
    Chan, S. K.
    Bindlish, R.
    O'Neill, P.
    Jackson, T.
    Njoku, E.
    Dunbar, S.
    Chaubell, J.
    Piepmeier, J.
    Yueh, S.
    Entekhabi, D.
    Colliander, A.
    Chen, F.
    Cosh, M. H.
    Caldwell, T.
    Walker, J.
    Berg, A.
    McNairn, H.
    Thibeault, M.
    Martinez-Fernandez, J.
    Uldall, F.
    Seyfried, M.
    Bosch, D.
    Starks, P.
    Collins, C. Holifield
    Prueger, J.
    van der Velde, R.
    Asanuma, J.
    Palecki, M.
    Small, E. E.
    Zreda, M.
    Calvet, J.
    Crow, W. T.
    Kerr, Y.
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 204 : 931 - 941
  • [8] Evaluation of SMAP, SMOS, and AMSR2 soil moisture retrievals against observations from two networks on the Tibetan Plateau
    Chen, Yingying
    Yang, Kun
    Qin, Jun
    Cui, Qian
    Lu, Hui
    La, Zhu
    Han, Menglei
    Tang, Wenjun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2017, 122 (11) : 5780 - 5792
  • [9] Validation of SMAP surface soil moisture products with core validation sites
    Colliander, A.
    Jackson, T. J.
    Bindlish, R.
    Chan, S.
    Das, N.
    Kim, S. B.
    Cosh, M. H.
    Dunbar, R. S.
    Dang, L.
    Pashaian, L.
    Asanuma, J.
    Aida, K.
    Berg, A.
    Rowlandson, T.
    Bosch, D.
    Caldwell, T.
    Caylor, K.
    Goodrich, D.
    al Jassar, H.
    Lopez-Baeza, E.
    Martinez-Fernandez, J.
    Gonzalez-Zamora, A.
    Livingston, S.
    McNairn, H.
    Pacheco, A.
    Moghaddam, M.
    Montzka, C.
    Notarnicola, C.
    Niedrist, G.
    Pellarin, T.
    Prueger, J.
    Pulliainen, J.
    Rautiainen, K.
    Ramos, J.
    Seyfried, M.
    Starks, P.
    Su, Z.
    Zeng, Y.
    van der Velde, R.
    Thibeault, M.
    Dorigo, W.
    Vreugdenhil, M.
    Walker, J. P.
    Wu, X.
    Monerris, A.
    O'Neill, P. E.
    Entekhabi, D.
    Njoku, E. G.
    Yueh, S.
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 191 : 215 - 231
  • [10] Soil Moisture Mapping from Satellites: An Intercomparison of SMAP, SMOS, FY3B, AMSR2, and ESA CCI over Two Dense Network Regions at Different Spatial Scales
    Cui, Chenyang
    Xu, Jia
    Zeng, Jiangyuan
    Chen, Kun-Shan
    Bai, Xiaojing
    Lu, Hui
    Chen, Quan
    Zhao, Tianjie
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 10 (01)