Retailer involvement in carbon emission reduction under the Cap-and-Trade mechanism

被引:0
作者
Cai, Haibo [1 ]
Chen, Leiyu [2 ]
Yuan, Yuan [3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Guangnan Expressway Co, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[3] Shunfeng Holdings Co, Chongqing, Peoples R China
关键词
Cap-and-Trade; carbon emission; consumer environmental awareness; decentralized decision; centralized decision; SUSTAINABLE SUPPLY CHAIN; STRATEGIES; OPTIMIZATION; CONSTRAINTS; MANAGEMENT; INNOVATION; DECISIONS; COUNTRIES; PRODUCTS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1080/21642583.2023.2167886
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Under the ' Cap-and-Trade' mechanism of carbon emission, the low carbon management of supply chain is an indispensable link in the process of enterprise emission reduction. Constrained by carbon price and consumers' environmental awareness, this paper establishes a two-stage game model between retailers and manufacturers under decentralized and centralized decisions. Under the decentralized decision, this paper analyzes the optimal carbon emissions before and after the transfer, the conditions of transfer and the changes of profits with the proportion of transfer. Under the centralized decision, Nash equilibrium is used to study the distribution of additional profits. Conclusions are obtained as follows. (a) There are thresholds for carbon price and consumers' environmental awareness on carbon emissions, and the optimal emissions on both sides of the threshold will vary with the cost of emission reduction. (b) In a decentralized decision, the participation of retailers in abatement depends on the market abatement costs and abatement benefits, while a certain range of transfer rates can optimize the profitability of retailers. (c) In the centralized decision, manufacturer and retailer formulate emission reduction strategies jointly and share the extra profits equally.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Trade from resource-rich countries avoids the existence of a global pollution haven hypothesis [J].
Antonio Lopez, Luis ;
Arce, Guadalupe ;
Kronenberg, Tobias ;
Rodrigues, Joao F. D. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 175 :599-611
[2]   A decision framework for the analysis of green supply chain contracts: An evolutionary game approach [J].
Barari, Sikhar ;
Agarwal, Gaurav ;
Zhang, W. J. ;
Mahanty, Biswajit ;
Tiwari, M. K. .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2012, 39 (03) :2965-2976
[3]   An analysis of consumer reactions to green strategies [J].
Borin, Norm ;
Lindsey-Mullikin, Joan ;
Krishnan, R. .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT AND BRAND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 22 (02) :118-+
[4]   Sustainable Supply Chain Management-A Conceptual Framework and Future Research Perspectives [J].
Brandenburg, Marcus ;
Gruchmann, Tim ;
Oelze, Nelly .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (24)
[5]   Emerging carbon constraints for corporate risk management [J].
Busch, Timo ;
Hoffmann, Volker H. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 62 (3-4) :518-528
[6]   Will developing countries become pollution havens for developed countries? An empirical investigation in the Belt and Road [J].
Cai, Xiang ;
Che, Xiahui ;
Zhu, Bangzhu ;
Zhao, Juan ;
Xie, Rui .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 198 :624-632
[7]   Using evolutionary game theory to study governments and manufacturers' behavioral strategies under various carbon taxes and subsidies [J].
Chen, Wanting ;
Hu, Zhi-Hua .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 201 :123-141
[8]   Emissions in a decarbonised economy? Global lessons from a carbon footprint analysis of Iceland [J].
Clarke, Jack ;
Heinonen, Jukka ;
Ottelin, Juudit .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 166 :1175-1186
[9]   Coal-Electric Power Supply Chain Reduction and Operation Strategy under the Cap-and-Trade Model and Green Financial Background [J].
Da, Bowen ;
Liu, Chuanzhe ;
Liu, Nana ;
Xia, Yufei ;
Xie, Fangming .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (11)
[10]   Collaborative mechanism of a sustainable supply chain with environmental constraints and carbon caps [J].
Ding, Huiping ;
Zhao, Qilan ;
An, Zhirong ;
Tang, Ou .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2016, 181 :191-207