Smear Layer and Debris Removal from Root Canals Comparing Traditional Syringe Irrigation and 3D Cleaning: An Ex Vivo Study

被引:6
|
作者
Iandolo, Alfredo [1 ]
Pisano, Massimo [1 ]
Abdellatif, Dina [2 ]
Sangiovanni, Giuseppe [1 ]
Pantaleo, Giuseppe [1 ]
Martina, Stefano [1 ]
Amato, Alessandra [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salerno, Dept Med & Surg, I-84081 Salerno, Italy
[2] Univ Alexandria, Fac Dent, Dept Endodont, Alexandria 21531, Egypt
关键词
EDTA; endodontics; root canal irrigants; smear layer; sodium hypochlorite; ultrasonics; NEEDLE; CLEANLINESS; INSTRUMENTS; ENDODONTICS; FLOW;
D O I
10.3390/jcm12020492
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Endodontic treatment objectives comprise eliminating or decreasing bacterial load inside the complex endodontic space. Removing the smear layer and debris becomes mandatory to achieve good three-dimensional (3D) cleaning. Aim: This study assesses the difference in smear layer removal using the 3D cleaning technique and traditional syringe needle irrigation. The 3D cleaning technique includes the ultrasonic activation of intracanal-heated NaOCl. Materials and Methods: Our current study used single-rooted human mandibular premolar teeth to test the earlier-mentioned technique (n = 30). Initially, an endodontic access cavity was performed. Consequently, specimens were randomly distributed into three study groups according to irrigation protocol. The groups were Group 1, where the traditional syringe needle irrigation system was applied; Group 2, where the 3D cleaning technique was performed; and Group 3, in which teeth remained uncleaned as it was regarded as the control group. Once the experiment was completed, the teeth were decoronated at the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) and examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Debris and smear layers were viewed in 1000x magnification and scored. Results: Statistical analysis was performed with a standard statistical software package (SPSS, version 28.0; SPSS IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Data were analyzed with a nonparametric analysis of variance (Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA) among the groups tested and among the thirds of the canals. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. A statistically significant (p < 0.05) lower mean smear layer and debris score was observed in both study groups compared to the control group. Group 2 showed better results compared to Group 1. Conclusions: The present study concluded that the 3D cleaning technique is an effective irrigation method for removing debris and smear layers. Future research, such as CLSM (Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy) and Histological study, should be employed to confirm this study's conclusion.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Debris and Smear Layer Removal in Curved Root Canals: A Comparative Study of Ultrasonic and Sonic Irrigant Activation Techniques
    Wigler, Ronald
    Srour, Yara
    Wilchfort, Yuval
    Metzger, Zvi
    Kfir, Anda
    DENTISTRY JOURNAL, 2024, 12 (03)
  • [2] The effect of different irrigation protocols on smear layer removal in root canals of primary teeth: a SEM study
    Demirel, Akif
    Yuksel, Burcu Nihan
    Ziya, Meryem
    Gumus, Husniye
    Dogan, Salih
    Sari, Saziye
    ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2019, 77 (05) : 380 - 385
  • [3] Effect of aquatine endodontic cleanser on smear layer removal in the root canals of ex vivo human teeth
    Garcia, Faustino
    Murray, Peter E.
    Garcia-Godoy, Franklin
    Namerow, Kenneth N.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ORAL SCIENCE, 2010, 18 (04) : 403 - 408
  • [4] Effectiveness of different activated irrigation techniques on debris and smear layer removal from curved root canals: a SEM evaluation
    Haupt, Franziska
    Meinel, Michael
    Gunawardana, Asanka
    Huelsmann, Michael
    AUSTRALIAN ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2020, 46 (01) : 40 - 46
  • [5] Comparison of irrigant activation devices and conventional needle irrigation on smear layer and debris removal in curved canals. (Smear layer removal from irrigant activation using SEM)
    Andreani, Yasmina
    Gad, Benjamin Thomas
    Cocks, Thomas Charles
    Harrison, Jonathan
    Keresztes, Mark Edward
    Pomfret, James Kennan
    Rees, Evan Benjamin
    Ma, Duoduo
    Baloun, Brett Lindsay
    Rahimi, Mehdi
    AUSTRALIAN ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2021, 47 (02) : 143 - 149
  • [6] Comparison of three irrigation methods: SWEEPS, ultrasonic, and traditional irrigation, in smear layer and debris removal abilities in the root canal, beyond the fractured instrument
    Vatanpour, Mehdi
    Toursavadkouhi, Sohrab
    Sajjad, Shirin
    PHOTODIAGNOSIS AND PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY, 2022, 37
  • [7] Recent innovations in endodontic irrigation and effects on smear layer removal: an ex-vivo study
    Ayfer Atav
    Alessio Zanza
    Aysenaz Gunes
    Luca Testarelli
    Massimo Galli
    Qorri Erda
    Michela Relucenti
    Orlando Donfrancesco
    Gianluca Gambarini
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 29 (6)
  • [8] Effectiveness of Different Irrigant Agitation Techniques on Debris and Smear Layer Removal in Curved Root Canals: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study
    Roedig, Tina
    Doellmann, Stefan
    Konietschke, Frank
    Drebenstedt, Steffi
    Huelsmann, Michael
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2010, 36 (12) : 1983 - 1987
  • [9] Comparison of five different irrigation techniques on smear layer removal in apical thirds of root canals of mandibular first premolar: A scanning electron microscopic study
    Jasrotia, Ankush
    Bhagat, Kanchan
    Bhagat, Neeru
    Bhagat, Ravinder K.
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF PREVENTIVE AND COMMUNITY DENTISTRY, 2019, 9 (06) : 630 - 636
  • [10] Effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher, EndoActivator, and File agitation on debris and smear layer removal in curved root canals: a comparative study
    Elnaghy, Amr M.
    Mandorah, Ayman
    Elsaka, Shaymaa E.
    ODONTOLOGY, 2017, 105 (02) : 178 - 183