First-site-metastasis pattern in patients with inoperable stage III NSCLC treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy with or without immune check-point inhibition: a retrospective analysis

被引:2
作者
Hofstetter, Kerstin [1 ]
Taugner, Julian [1 ]
Kaesmann, Lukas [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Mansoorian, Sina [1 ]
Floersch, Benedikt [1 ]
Eze, Chukwuka [1 ]
Tufman, Amanda [2 ,4 ]
Reinmuth, Niels [5 ]
Duell, Thomas [5 ]
Belka, Claus [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Manapov, Farkhad [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Munich, Germany
[2] German Ctr Lung Res DZL, Comprehens Pneumol Ctr Munich CPC M, Munich, Germany
[3] German Canc Consortium DKTK, Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
[4] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Thorac Oncol Ctr Munich, Dept Internal Med 5, Div Resp Med & Thorac Oncol, Munich, Germany
[5] Asklepios Kliniken GmbH, Asklepios Fachkliniken Muenchen, Gauting, Germany
关键词
Lung Cancer; Thoracic Radiotherapy; Outcome; Immune Checkpoint Inhibition; Metastasis; CELL LUNG-CANCER; CHEMORADIATION; RADIOTHERAPY; SURVIVAL; CONSOLIDATION; MANAGEMENT; NIVOLUMAB; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1007/s00066-023-02175-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PurposeThe aim of this study was to investigate a first-site-metastasis pattern (FSMP) in unresectable stage III NSCLC after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) with or without immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI).MethodsWe defined three patient subgroups according to the year of initial multimodal treatment: A (2011-2014), B (2015-2017) and C (2018-2020). Different treatment-related parameters were analyzed. Observed outcome parameters were brain metastasis-free survival (BMFS), extracranial distant metastasis-free survival (ecDMFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS).Results136 patients treated between 2011 and 2020 were included with >= 60.0 Gy total dose and concurrent chemotherapy (cCRT); thirty-six (26%) received ICI. Median follow-up was 49.7 (range:0.7-126.1), median OS 31.2 (95% CI:16.4-30.3) months (23.4 for non-ICI vs not reached for ICI patients, p = 0.001).Median BMFS/ecDMFS/DMFS in subgroups A, B and C was 14.9/16.3/14.7 months, 20.6/12.9/12.7 months and not reached (NR)/NR/36.4 months (p = 0.004/0.001/0.016).For cCRT+ICI median BMFS was 53.1 vs. 19.1 months for cCRT alone (p = 0.005). Median ecDMFS achieved 55.2 vs. 17.9 (p = 0.003) and median DMFS 29.5 (95% CI: 1.4-57.6) vs 14.93 (95% CI:10.8-19.0) months (p = 0.031), respectively.Multivariate analysis showed that age over 65 (HR:1.629; p = 0.036), GTV >= 78 cc (HR: 2.100; p = 0.002) and V20 >= 30 (HR: 2.400; p = 0.002) were negative prognosticators for BMFS and GTV >= 78 cc for ecDMFS (HR: 1.739; p = 0.027).After onset of brain metastasis (BM), patients survived 13.3 (95% CI: 6.4-20.2) months and 8.6 months (95% CI: 1.6-15.5) after extracranial-distant-metastasis (ecDM). Patients with ecDM as FSMP reached significantly worse overall survival of 22.1 (range:14.4-29.8) vs. 40.1 (range:18.7-61.3) months (p = 0.034) in the rest of cohort. In contrast, BM as FSMP had no impact on OS.Results136 patients treated between 2011 and 2020 were included with >= 60.0 Gy total dose and concurrent chemotherapy (cCRT); thirty-six (26%) received ICI. Median follow-up was 49.7 (range:0.7-126.1), median OS 31.2 (95% CI:16.4-30.3) months (23.4 for non-ICI vs not reached for ICI patients, p = 0.001).Median BMFS/ecDMFS/DMFS in subgroups A, B and C was 14.9/16.3/14.7 months, 20.6/12.9/12.7 months and not reached (NR)/NR/36.4 months (p = 0.004/0.001/0.016).For cCRT+ICI median BMFS was 53.1 vs. 19.1 months for cCRT alone (p = 0.005). Median ecDMFS achieved 55.2 vs. 17.9 (p = 0.003) and median DMFS 29.5 (95% CI: 1.4-57.6) vs 14.93 (95% CI:10.8-19.0) months (p = 0.031), respectively.Multivariate analysis showed that age over 65 (HR:1.629; p = 0.036), GTV >= 78 cc (HR: 2.100; p = 0.002) and V20 >= 30 (HR: 2.400; p = 0.002) were negative prognosticators for BMFS and GTV >= 78 cc for ecDMFS (HR: 1.739; p = 0.027).After onset of brain metastasis (BM), patients survived 13.3 (95% CI: 6.4-20.2) months and 8.6 months (95% CI: 1.6-15.5) after extracranial-distant-metastasis (ecDM). Patients with ecDM as FSMP reached significantly worse overall survival of 22.1 (range:14.4-29.8) vs. 40.1 (range:18.7-61.3) months (p = 0.034) in the rest of cohort. In contrast, BM as FSMP had no impact on OS.Results136 patients treated between 2011 and 2020 were included with >= 60.0 Gy total dose and concurrent chemotherapy (cCRT); thirty-six (26%) received ICI. Median follow-up was 49.7 (range:0.7-126.1), median OS 31.2 (95% CI:16.4-30.3) months (23.4 for non-ICI vs not reached for ICI patients, p = 0.001).Median BMFS/ecDMFS/DMFS in subgroups A, B and C was 14.9/16.3/14.7 months, 20.6/12.9/12. 7 months and not reached (NR)/NR/36.4 months (p = 0.004/0.001/0.016).For cCRT+ICI median BMFS was 53.1 vs. 19.1 months for cCRT alone (p = 0.005). Median ecDMFS achieved 55.2 vs. 17.9 (p = 0.003) and median DMFS 29.5 (95% CI: 1.4-57.6) vs 14.93 (95% CI:10.8-19.0) months (p = 0.031), respectively.Multivariate analysis showed that age over 65 (HR:1.629; p = 0.036), GTV >= 78 cc (HR: 2.100; p = 0.002) and V20 >= 30 (HR: 2.400; p = 0.002) were negative prognosticators for BMFS and GTV >= 78 cc for ecDMFS (HR: 1.739; p = 0.027).After onset of brain metastasis (BM), patients survived 13.3 (95% CI: 6.4-20.2) months and 8.6 months (95% CI: 1.6-15.5) after extracranial-distant-metastasis (ecDM). Patients with ecDM as FSMP reached significantly worse overall survival of 22.1 (range:14.4-29.8) vs. 40.1 (range:18.7-61.3) months (p = 0.034) in the rest of cohort. In contrast, BM as FSMP had no impact on OS.Results136 patients treated between 2011 and 2020 were included with >= 60.0 Gy total dose and concurrent chemotherapy (cCRT); thirty-six (26%) received ICI. Median follow-up was 49.7 (range:0.7-126.1), median OS 31.2 (95% CI:16.4-30.3) months (23.4 for non-ICI vs not reached for ICI patients, p = 0.001).Median BMFS/ecDMFS/DMFS in subgroups A, B and C was 14.9/16.3/14.7 months, 20.6/12.9/12.7 months and not reached (NR)/NR/36.4 months (p = 0.004/0.001/0.016).For cCRT+ICI median BMFS was 53.1 vs. 19.1 months for cCRT alone (p = 0.005). Median ecDMFS achieved 55.2 vs. 17.9 (p = 0.003) and median DMFS 29.5 (95% CI: 1.4-57.6) vs 14.93 (95% CI:10.8-19.0) months (p = 0.031), respectively.Multivariate analysis showed that age over 65 (HR:1.629; p = 0.036), GTV >= 78 cc (HR: 2.100; p = 0.002) and V20 >= 30 (HR: 2.400; p = 0.002) were negative prognosticators for BMFS and GTV >= 78 cc for ecDMFS (HR: 1.739; p = 0.027).After onset of brain metastasis (BM), patients survived 13.3 (95% CI: 6.4-20.2) months and 8.6 months (95% CI: 1.6-15.5) after extracranial-distant-metastasis (ecDM). Patients with ecDM as FSMP reached significantly worse overall survival of 22.1 (range:14.4-29.8) vs. 40.1 (range:18.7-61.3) months (p = 0.034) in the rest of cohort. In contrast, BM as FSMP had no impact on OS.Results136 patients treated between 2011 and 2020 were included with >= 60.0 Gy total dose and concurrent chemotherapy (cCRT); thirty-six (26%) received ICI. Median follow-up was 49.7 (range:0.7-126.1), median OS 31.2 (95% CI:16.4-30.3) months (23.4 for non-ICI vs not reached for ICI patients, p = 0.001).Median BMFS/ecDMFS/DMFS in subgroups A, B and C was 14.9/16.3/14.7 months, 20.6/12.9/12.7 months and not reached (NR)/NR/36.4 months (p = 0.004/0.001/0.016).For cCRT+ICI median BMFS was 53.1 vs. 19.1 months for cCRT alone (p = 0.005). Median ecDMFS achieved 55.2 vs. 17.9 (p = 0.003) and median DMFS 29.5 (95% CI: 1.4-57.6) vs 14.93 (95% CI:10.8-19.0) months (p = 0.031), respectively.Multivariate analysis showed that age over 65 (HR:1.629; p = 0.036), GTV >= 78 cc (HR: 2.100; p = 0.002) and V20 >= 30 (HR: 2.400; p = 0.002) were negative prognosticators for BMFS and GTV >= 78 cc for ecDMFS (HR: 1.739; p = 0.027).After onset of brain metastasis (BM), patients survived 13.3 (95% CI: 6.4-20.2) months and 8.6 months (95% CI: 1.6-15.5) after extracranial-distant-metastasis (ecDM). Patients with ecDM as FSMP reached significantly worse overall survival of 22.1 (range:14.4-29.8) vs. 40.1 (range:18.7-61.3) months (p = 0.034) in the rest of cohort. In contrast, BM as FSMP had no impact on OS. ConclusionThis retrospective analysis of inoperable stage III NSCLC patients revealed that age over 65, V20 >= 30 and GTV >= 78 cc were prognosticators for BMFS and GTV >= 78 cc for ecDMFS. ICI treatment led to a significant improvement of BMFS, ecDMFS and DMFS. ecDM as FSMP was associated with significant deterioration of OS, whereas BM as FSMP was not.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 496
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
ALBERTI W, 1995, BRIT MED J, V311, P899
[2]   Overall Survival with Durvalumab after Chemoradiotherapy in Stage III NSCLC [J].
Antonia, S. J. ;
Villegas, A. ;
Daniel, D. ;
Vicente, D. ;
Murakami, S. ;
Hui, R. ;
Kurata, T. ;
Chiappori, A. ;
Lee, K. H. ;
de Wit, M. ;
Cho, B. C. ;
Bourhaba, M. ;
Quantin, X. ;
Tokito, T. ;
Mekhail, T. ;
Planchard, D. ;
Kim, Y. -C. ;
Karapetis, C. S. ;
Hiret, S. ;
Ostoros, G. ;
Kubota, K. ;
Gray, J. E. ;
Paz-Ares, L. ;
Carpeno, J. de Castro ;
Faivre-Finn, C. ;
Reck, M. ;
Vansteenkiste, J. ;
Spigel, D. R. ;
Wadsworth, C. ;
Melillo, G. ;
Taboada, M. ;
Dennis, P. A. ;
Ozguroglu, M. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2018, 379 (24) :2342-2350
[3]   Durvalumab after Chemoradiotherapy in Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer [J].
Antonia, S. J. ;
Villegas, A. ;
Daniel, D. ;
Vicente, D. ;
Murakami, S. ;
Hui, R. ;
Yokoi, T. ;
Chiappori, A. ;
Lee, K. H. ;
de Wit, M. ;
Cho, B. C. ;
Bourhaba, M. ;
Quantin, X. ;
Tokito, T. ;
Mekhail, T. ;
Planchard, D. ;
Kim, Y. -C. ;
Karapetis, C. S. ;
Hiret, S. ;
Ostoros, G. ;
Kubota, K. ;
Gray, J. E. ;
Paz-Ares, L. ;
de Castro Carpeno, J. ;
Wadsworth, C. ;
Melillo, G. ;
Jiang, H. ;
Huang, Y. ;
Dennis, P. A. ;
Ozguroglu, M. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 377 (20) :1919-1929
[4]   Clinical Outcomes With Pembrolizumab-Based Therapies in Recurrent/Refractory NSCLC After Chemoradiation and Consolidative Durvalumab [J].
Delasos, Lukas ;
Wei, Wei ;
Hassan, Khaled A. ;
Pennell, Nathan A. ;
Patil, Pradnya ;
Stevenson, James .
CLINICAL LUNG CANCER, 2023, 24 (06) :E205-E213
[5]   Long term outcome after 48Gy stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy for peripheral stage I non-small cell lung cancer [J].
Dubaere, Emilie ;
Goffaux, Mathilde ;
Wanet, Marie ;
Bihin, Benoit ;
Gheldof, Celine ;
Demoulin, Anne-Sophie ;
Bolly, Antoine ;
Bustin, Frederique ;
Duplaquet, Fabrice ;
Baugnee, Paul-Emile ;
Gustin, Michel ;
Hers, Vincent ;
Maisin, Fabienne ;
Marchand, Eric ;
Ocak, Sebahat ;
Pirard, Lionel ;
Vancutsem, Oswald ;
Van Neck, Evelyne ;
Vandermoten, Guy ;
Zaharia, Luminata ;
Remouchamps, Vincent .
BMC CANCER, 2019, 19 (1)
[6]   A phase 2 trial of consolidation pembrolizumab following concurrent chemoradiation for patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer: Hoosier cancer research network LUN 14-179 [J].
Durm, Greg A. ;
Jabbour, Salma K. ;
Althouse, Sandra K. ;
Liu, Ziyue ;
Sadiq, Ahad A. ;
Zon, Robin T. ;
Jalal, Shadia, I ;
Kloecker, Goetz H. ;
Williamson, Michael J. ;
Reckamp, Karen L. ;
Langdon, Robert M. ;
Kio, Ebenezer A. ;
Gentzler, Ryan D. ;
Adesunloye, Bamidele A. ;
Harb, Wael A. ;
Walling, Radhika, V ;
Titzer, Michael L. ;
Hanna, Nasser H. .
CANCER, 2020, 126 (19) :4353-4361
[7]   Management of Brain Metastases in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer [J].
Ernani, Vinicius ;
Stinchcombe, Thomas E. .
JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2019, 15 (11) :563-+
[8]   PET/CT imaging for evaluation of multimodal treatment efficacy and toxicity in advanced NSCLC-current state and future directions [J].
Eze, Chukwuka ;
Schmidt-Hegemann, Nina-Sophie ;
Sawicki, Lino Morris ;
Kirchner, Julian ;
Roengvoraphoj, Olarn ;
Kaesmann, Lukas ;
Mittlmeier, Lena M. ;
Kunz, Wolfgang G. ;
Tufman, Amanda ;
Dinkel, Julien ;
Ricke, Jens ;
Belka, Claus ;
Manapov, Farkhad ;
Unterrainer, Marcus .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2021, 48 (12) :3975-3989
[9]  
Flentje M, 2016, STRAHLENTHER ONKOL, V192, P216, DOI 10.1007/s00066-016-0941-8
[10]   Treatment patterns and prognosis of patients with inoperable stage III NSCLC after completion of concurrent chemoradiotherapy ± immune checkpoint inhibition: a decade-long single-center historical analysis [J].
Floersch, Benedikt ;
Taugner, Julian ;
Kaesmann, Lukas ;
Kenndoff, Saskia ;
Guggenberger, Julian ;
Tufman, Amanda ;
Reinmuth, Niels ;
Duell, Thomas ;
Belka, Claus ;
Eze, Chukwuka ;
Manapov, Farkhad .
JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 149 (07) :3267-3276