Left Bundle Branch Pacing for Bradycardia in Non-obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Patients: Feasibility, Safety, and Effect

被引:1
作者
Yang, Wen [1 ]
Wu, Tian [1 ]
Wu, Yixian [1 ]
Xu, Jiayi [1 ]
Jiang, Zhixin [1 ]
Zhou, Xiujuan [1 ]
Shan, Qijun [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Jiangsu Prov Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Affiliated Hosp 1, 300 Guangzhou Rd, Nanjing 210029, Peoples R China
关键词
Left bundle branch pacing; Bradycardia; Physiological pacing; Non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION; HEART-FAILURE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s10557-023-07440-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
PurposeLeft bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is as an innovative physiological pacing approach. The research on LBBP in non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (NOHCM) patients is scarce. This study aimed to assess the feasibility, safety, and effect of LBBP in bradycardia NOHCM patients with permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation indication.MethodsThirteen consecutive patients with NOHCM who received LBBP were retrospectively enrolled as a hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) group. Following 1:3 matching, 39 patients without HCM were randomly matched as a control group. Echocardiographic index and pacing parameters were collected.ResultsThe successful LBBP was achieved in 96.2% of all cases (50/52), and the success rate of the HCM group was 92.3% (12/13). In the HCM group, the paced QRS duration (from the pacing stimulus to QRS end) was 145.6 +/- 20.8 ms. The stimulus to left ventricular activation time (s-LVAT) was 87.4 +/- 15.2 ms. In the control group, the paced QRS duration was 139.4 +/- 17.2 ms, and the s-LVAT was 79.9 +/- 14.1 ms. During the implantation, R-wave sensing and the pacing threshold of the HCM group were significantly higher than the control group (20.2 +/- 10.5 vs 12.5 +/- 5.9 mV, P < 0.05; 0.8 +/- 0.3 vs 0.6 +/- 0.2V/0.4 ms, P < 0.05). In addition, the fluoroscopic duration and procedural duration were longer in the HCM group (14.8 +/- 8.3 vs 10.3 +/- 6.6min, P = 0.07; 131.8 +/- 50.5 vs 101.4 +/- 41.6 min, P < 0.05). The lead insertion depth was 15 +/- 2 mm in the HCM group, and no procedure-related complications occurred. During the 12-month follow-up, pacing parameters remained stable and were of no significance in the two groups. The cardiac function did not deteriorate, and the left ventricular outflow tract gradient (LVOTG) did not increase in the follow-up.ConclusionLBBP might be feasible and safe for NOHCM patients with conventional bradycardia pacing indication, and there is no deterioration in cardiac function and LVOTG of patients with NOHCM.
引用
收藏
页码:927 / 935
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Intracardiac ultrasound-guided left bundle branch pacing in a bradycardia patient
    Zhang, Jiefang
    Sun, Yaxun
    Zhang, Zuwen
    Jiang, Chenyang
    Fu, Guosheng
    [J]. CLINICAL CASE REPORTS, 2020, 8 (06): : 1030 - 1033
  • [42] Quantification of left atrial function in patients with non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy by cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking imaging: a feasibility and reproducibility study
    Yang, Yingxia
    Yin, Gang
    Jiang, Yong
    Song, Lei
    Zhao, Shihua
    Lu, Minjie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2020, 22 (01)
  • [43] The quality of life of patients with pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy after they upgrade to left bundle branch pacing
    Li, Huacheng
    Wang, Long
    Peng, Xinna
    Wu, Jiying
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2021, 13 (04): : 3044 - 3053
  • [44] Mid-term feasibility, safety and outcomes of left bundle branch pacing-single center experience
    Ponnusamy, Shunmuga Sundaram
    Muthu, Giridhar
    Kumar, Mahesh
    Bopanna, Dasarath
    Anand, Vijesh
    Kumar, Surya
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 60 (02) : 337 - 346
  • [45] Initial Experience, Safety, and Feasibility of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing A Multicenter Prospective Study
    Padala, Santosh K.
    Master, Vivak M.
    Terricabras, Maria
    Chiocchini, Andrea
    Garg, Aatish
    Kron, Jordana
    Shepard, Richard
    Kalahasty, Gautham
    Azizi, Zahara
    Tsang, Bernice
    Khaykin, Yaariv
    Pantano, Alfredo
    Koneru, Jayanthi N.
    Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.
    Verma, Atul
    [J]. JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 6 (14) : 1773 - 1782
  • [46] Long-term efficacy of left bundle branch pacing and biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure complicated with left bundle branch block
    Li, Jia
    Yi, Hongwei
    Han, Jun
    Han, Hongwei
    Su, Xi
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2024, 11
  • [47] Computed tomography imaging-identified location and electrocardiographic characteristics of left bundle branch area pacing in bradycardia patients
    Chen, Keping
    Liu, Xingbin
    Hou, Xiaofeng
    Qiu, Yuanhao
    Lin, Jinxuan
    Dai, Yan
    Xu, Yuanning
    Jiang, Lingyun
    Zhou, Xiaohong
    Zhang, Xue
    Lu, Hongyang
    Mara, Nicki
    Demmer, Wade
    Cheng, Alan
    Zou, Jiangang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 33 (06) : 1244 - 1254
  • [48] Comparison between his-bundle pacing and left bundle branch pacing in patients with atrioventricular block
    Hu, Yiran
    Li, Hui
    Gu, Min
    Hua, Wei
    Niu, Hongxia
    Zhang, Nixiao
    Liu, Xi
    Chen, Xuhua
    Hou, Cuihong
    Zhou, Xiaohong
    Zhang, Shu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 62 (01) : 63 - 73
  • [49] Comparison between his-bundle pacing and left bundle branch pacing in patients with atrioventricular block
    Yiran Hu
    Hui Li
    Min Gu
    Wei Hua
    Hongxia Niu
    Nixiao Zhang
    Xi Liu
    Xuhua Chen
    Cuihong Hou
    Xiaohong Zhou
    Shu Zhang
    [J]. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2021, 62 : 63 - 73
  • [50] Cardiac resynchronization therapy by left bundle branch area pacing in patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block
    Zhang, Weiwei
    Huang, Jingjuan
    Qi, Yiding
    Wang, Fei
    Guo, Lina
    Shi, Xuerui
    Wu, Weihua
    Zhou, Xiaohong
    Li, Ruogu
    [J]. HEART RHYTHM, 2019, 16 (12) : 1783 - 1790