Left Bundle Branch Pacing for Bradycardia in Non-obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Patients: Feasibility, Safety, and Effect

被引:1
作者
Yang, Wen [1 ]
Wu, Tian [1 ]
Wu, Yixian [1 ]
Xu, Jiayi [1 ]
Jiang, Zhixin [1 ]
Zhou, Xiujuan [1 ]
Shan, Qijun [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Jiangsu Prov Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Affiliated Hosp 1, 300 Guangzhou Rd, Nanjing 210029, Peoples R China
关键词
Left bundle branch pacing; Bradycardia; Physiological pacing; Non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION; HEART-FAILURE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s10557-023-07440-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
PurposeLeft bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is as an innovative physiological pacing approach. The research on LBBP in non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (NOHCM) patients is scarce. This study aimed to assess the feasibility, safety, and effect of LBBP in bradycardia NOHCM patients with permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation indication.MethodsThirteen consecutive patients with NOHCM who received LBBP were retrospectively enrolled as a hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) group. Following 1:3 matching, 39 patients without HCM were randomly matched as a control group. Echocardiographic index and pacing parameters were collected.ResultsThe successful LBBP was achieved in 96.2% of all cases (50/52), and the success rate of the HCM group was 92.3% (12/13). In the HCM group, the paced QRS duration (from the pacing stimulus to QRS end) was 145.6 +/- 20.8 ms. The stimulus to left ventricular activation time (s-LVAT) was 87.4 +/- 15.2 ms. In the control group, the paced QRS duration was 139.4 +/- 17.2 ms, and the s-LVAT was 79.9 +/- 14.1 ms. During the implantation, R-wave sensing and the pacing threshold of the HCM group were significantly higher than the control group (20.2 +/- 10.5 vs 12.5 +/- 5.9 mV, P < 0.05; 0.8 +/- 0.3 vs 0.6 +/- 0.2V/0.4 ms, P < 0.05). In addition, the fluoroscopic duration and procedural duration were longer in the HCM group (14.8 +/- 8.3 vs 10.3 +/- 6.6min, P = 0.07; 131.8 +/- 50.5 vs 101.4 +/- 41.6 min, P < 0.05). The lead insertion depth was 15 +/- 2 mm in the HCM group, and no procedure-related complications occurred. During the 12-month follow-up, pacing parameters remained stable and were of no significance in the two groups. The cardiac function did not deteriorate, and the left ventricular outflow tract gradient (LVOTG) did not increase in the follow-up.ConclusionLBBP might be feasible and safe for NOHCM patients with conventional bradycardia pacing indication, and there is no deterioration in cardiac function and LVOTG of patients with NOHCM.
引用
收藏
页码:927 / 935
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Feasibility and safety of left bundle branch area pacing-cardiac resynchronization therapy in elderly patients
    Grieco, Domenico
    Bressi, Edoardo
    Sedlacek, Kamil
    Curila, Karol
    Vernooy, Kevin
    Fedele, Elisa
    De Ruvo, Ermenegildo
    Fagagnini, Alessandro
    Kron, Jordana
    Padala, Santosh K.
    Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.
    Calo, Leonardo
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 66 (02) : 311 - 321
  • [32] The Implantation of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients with and without Bundle Branch Block
    Chen, Tian-Ping
    Shi, Xiao-Jun
    Lu, Dong-Yu
    Zhang, Heng
    JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 2021, 31 (11): : 1268 - 1272
  • [33] Remarkable response to cardiac resynchronization therapy via left bundle branch pacing in patients with true left bundle branch block
    Guo, Jincun
    Li, Linlin
    Xiao, Guosheng
    Ye, Tao
    Huang, Xinyi
    Meng, Fanqi
    Li, Qiang
    Chen, Simei
    Cai, Binni
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 43 (12) : 1460 - 1468
  • [34] Mid-term feasibility, safety and outcomes of left bundle branch pacing–single center experience
    Shunmuga Sundaram Ponnusamy
    Giridhar Muthu
    Mahesh Kumar
    Dasarath Bopanna
    Vijesh Anand
    Surya Kumar
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2021, 60 : 337 - 346
  • [35] Respiratory dyssynchrony is a predictor of prognosis in patients with hypertrophic non-obstructive cardiomyopathy
    Potratz, Max
    Fox, Henrik
    Rudolph, Volker
    Faber, Lothar
    Dumitrescu, Daniel
    Bitter, Thomas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 332 : 105 - 112
  • [36] Left Bundle Branch Pacing Improved the Outcome of End-Stage Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Case Report
    Lin, Manxin
    Huang, Shufen
    Huang, Xinyi
    Li, Linlin
    Cai, Binni
    ANNALS OF NONINVASIVE ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2025, 30 (03)
  • [37] Left ventricular outflow obstruction occurs immediately after exercise in patients with non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
    Kim, Jong-Youn
    Choi, Eui-Young
    Kim, Wonho
    Rim, Se-Joong
    REVIEWS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2021, 22 (02) : 469 - 473
  • [38] Feasibility and safety of both His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing in atrial fibrillation patients: intermediate term follow-up
    Ye, Yang
    Zhang, Kai
    Yang, Ying
    Jiang, Dongmei
    Pan, Yiwen
    Sheng, Xia
    Wang, Bei
    Yu, Chan
    Zhang, Zuwen
    Zhang, Jiefang
    Wang, Li
    Jiang, Jiangfen
    Sun, Yaxun
    Liu, Qiang
    Cheng, Yunxian
    Gao, Bo
    Wang, Min
    He, Hong
    Jiang, Chenyang
    Fu, Guosheng
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 66 (02) : 271 - 280
  • [39] Feasibility and safety of both His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing in atrial fibrillation patients: intermediate term follow-up
    Yang Ye
    Kai Zhang
    Ying Yang
    Dongmei Jiang
    Yiwen Pan
    Xia Sheng
    Bei Wang
    Chan Yu
    Zuwen Zhang
    Jiefang Zhang
    Li Wang
    Jiangfen Jiang
    Yaxun Sun
    Qiang Liu
    Yunxian Cheng
    Bo Gao
    Min Wang
    Hong He
    Chenyang Jiang
    Guosheng Fu
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2023, 66 : 271 - 280
  • [40] Response of functional mitral regurgitation in nonischemic cardiomyopathy to left bundle branch pacing
    Ponnusamy, Shunmuga Sundaram
    Syed, Thabish
    Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi
    HEART RHYTHM, 2022, 19 (05) : 737 - 745