Left Bundle Branch Pacing for Bradycardia in Non-obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Patients: Feasibility, Safety, and Effect

被引:1
作者
Yang, Wen [1 ]
Wu, Tian [1 ]
Wu, Yixian [1 ]
Xu, Jiayi [1 ]
Jiang, Zhixin [1 ]
Zhou, Xiujuan [1 ]
Shan, Qijun [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Jiangsu Prov Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Affiliated Hosp 1, 300 Guangzhou Rd, Nanjing 210029, Peoples R China
关键词
Left bundle branch pacing; Bradycardia; Physiological pacing; Non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION; HEART-FAILURE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s10557-023-07440-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
PurposeLeft bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is as an innovative physiological pacing approach. The research on LBBP in non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (NOHCM) patients is scarce. This study aimed to assess the feasibility, safety, and effect of LBBP in bradycardia NOHCM patients with permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation indication.MethodsThirteen consecutive patients with NOHCM who received LBBP were retrospectively enrolled as a hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) group. Following 1:3 matching, 39 patients without HCM were randomly matched as a control group. Echocardiographic index and pacing parameters were collected.ResultsThe successful LBBP was achieved in 96.2% of all cases (50/52), and the success rate of the HCM group was 92.3% (12/13). In the HCM group, the paced QRS duration (from the pacing stimulus to QRS end) was 145.6 +/- 20.8 ms. The stimulus to left ventricular activation time (s-LVAT) was 87.4 +/- 15.2 ms. In the control group, the paced QRS duration was 139.4 +/- 17.2 ms, and the s-LVAT was 79.9 +/- 14.1 ms. During the implantation, R-wave sensing and the pacing threshold of the HCM group were significantly higher than the control group (20.2 +/- 10.5 vs 12.5 +/- 5.9 mV, P < 0.05; 0.8 +/- 0.3 vs 0.6 +/- 0.2V/0.4 ms, P < 0.05). In addition, the fluoroscopic duration and procedural duration were longer in the HCM group (14.8 +/- 8.3 vs 10.3 +/- 6.6min, P = 0.07; 131.8 +/- 50.5 vs 101.4 +/- 41.6 min, P < 0.05). The lead insertion depth was 15 +/- 2 mm in the HCM group, and no procedure-related complications occurred. During the 12-month follow-up, pacing parameters remained stable and were of no significance in the two groups. The cardiac function did not deteriorate, and the left ventricular outflow tract gradient (LVOTG) did not increase in the follow-up.ConclusionLBBP might be feasible and safe for NOHCM patients with conventional bradycardia pacing indication, and there is no deterioration in cardiac function and LVOTG of patients with NOHCM.
引用
收藏
页码:927 / 935
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Feasibility and safety of left bundle branch area pacing in very elderly patients (≥80 years)
    Jiang, Zhixin
    Chen, Yifan
    Chen, Chongchong
    Chen, Meng
    Chen, Yuanyuan
    Wu, Tian
    Yang, Wen
    Zhou, Xiujuan
    Shan, Qijun
    KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2022, 80 (04) : 452 - 460
  • [22] Axis deviation in nonischemic cardiomyopathy with left bundle branch block: Insights from left bundle branch pacing
    Ponnusamy, Shunmuga Sundaram
    Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 33 (02) : 318 - 321
  • [23] Feasibility and Safety of Permanent Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients With Conduction Disorders Following Prosthetic Cardiac Valves
    Wei, Hui-Qiang
    Li, Hui
    Liao, Hongtao
    Liang, Yuanhong
    Zhan, Xianzhang
    Zhang, Qianhuan
    Deng, Hai
    Wei, Wei
    Liao, Zili
    Liu, Yang
    Liu, Fangzhou
    Lin, Weidong
    Xue, Yumei
    Wu, Shulin
    Fang, Xianhong
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2021, 8
  • [24] His Bundle Pacing and Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients with Heart Failure
    Paluszkiewicz, Patrycja
    Martuszewski, Adrian
    Radziejewska, Jadwiga
    Zawadzki, Jacek
    Smereka, Jacek
    Gajek, Jacek
    BIOMEDICINES, 2024, 12 (10)
  • [25] Catecholamine response to exercise in patients with non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
    Shah, Ankit B.
    Bechis, Mary Z.
    Brown, Marcel
    Finch, Jennifer Michaud
    Loomer, Garrett
    Groezinger, Erich
    Weiner, Rory B.
    Wasfy, Meagan M.
    Picard, Michael H.
    Fifer, Michael A.
    Lewis, Gregory B.
    Baggish, Aaron L.
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2019, 597 (05): : 1337 - 1346
  • [26] Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Using Left Bundle Branch Pacing
    Huang, Weijian
    Wu, Shengjie
    Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi
    Su, Lan
    Chen, Xueying
    Cai, Bingni
    Zou, Jiangang
    Lan, Rongfang
    Fu, Guosheng
    Mao, Guangyun
    Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.
    Whinnett, Zachary, I
    Tung, Roderick
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 6 (07) : 849 - 858
  • [27] ECG patterns of successful permanent left bundle branch area pacing in bradycardia patients with typical bundle branch block
    Li, Xiaofei
    Fan, Xiaohan
    Li, Hui
    Ning, Xiaohui
    Liang, Erpeng
    Ma, Wentao
    Wang, Hao
    Liu, Zhimin
    Yao, Yan
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 43 (08): : 781 - 790
  • [28] Feasibility and stability of left bundle branch pacing in patients after prosthetic valve implantation
    Guo, Jincun
    Li, Linlin
    Xiao, Guosheng
    Huang, Xinyi
    Li, Qiang
    Wang, Yan
    Cai, Binni
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 43 (10) : 1110 - 1118
  • [29] Feasibility of His bundle pacing and atrioventricular junction ablation with left bundle branch area pacing as backup
    Mahajan, Ankit
    Trivedi, Rohan
    Subzposh, Faiz A.
    Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi
    HEART RHYTHM, 2024, 21 (07) : 1180 - 1181
  • [30] Shifting diastolic filling from right to left in non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: exploring new indications for biventricular pacing
    Zweerink, Alwin
    Allaart, Cornelis P.
    Burri, Haran
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2020, 22 (07) : 1273 - 1275