Left Bundle Branch Pacing for Bradycardia in Non-obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Patients: Feasibility, Safety, and Effect

被引:1
|
作者
Yang, Wen [1 ]
Wu, Tian [1 ]
Wu, Yixian [1 ]
Xu, Jiayi [1 ]
Jiang, Zhixin [1 ]
Zhou, Xiujuan [1 ]
Shan, Qijun [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Jiangsu Prov Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Affiliated Hosp 1, 300 Guangzhou Rd, Nanjing 210029, Peoples R China
关键词
Left bundle branch pacing; Bradycardia; Physiological pacing; Non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION; HEART-FAILURE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s10557-023-07440-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
PurposeLeft bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is as an innovative physiological pacing approach. The research on LBBP in non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (NOHCM) patients is scarce. This study aimed to assess the feasibility, safety, and effect of LBBP in bradycardia NOHCM patients with permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation indication.MethodsThirteen consecutive patients with NOHCM who received LBBP were retrospectively enrolled as a hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) group. Following 1:3 matching, 39 patients without HCM were randomly matched as a control group. Echocardiographic index and pacing parameters were collected.ResultsThe successful LBBP was achieved in 96.2% of all cases (50/52), and the success rate of the HCM group was 92.3% (12/13). In the HCM group, the paced QRS duration (from the pacing stimulus to QRS end) was 145.6 +/- 20.8 ms. The stimulus to left ventricular activation time (s-LVAT) was 87.4 +/- 15.2 ms. In the control group, the paced QRS duration was 139.4 +/- 17.2 ms, and the s-LVAT was 79.9 +/- 14.1 ms. During the implantation, R-wave sensing and the pacing threshold of the HCM group were significantly higher than the control group (20.2 +/- 10.5 vs 12.5 +/- 5.9 mV, P < 0.05; 0.8 +/- 0.3 vs 0.6 +/- 0.2V/0.4 ms, P < 0.05). In addition, the fluoroscopic duration and procedural duration were longer in the HCM group (14.8 +/- 8.3 vs 10.3 +/- 6.6min, P = 0.07; 131.8 +/- 50.5 vs 101.4 +/- 41.6 min, P < 0.05). The lead insertion depth was 15 +/- 2 mm in the HCM group, and no procedure-related complications occurred. During the 12-month follow-up, pacing parameters remained stable and were of no significance in the two groups. The cardiac function did not deteriorate, and the left ventricular outflow tract gradient (LVOTG) did not increase in the follow-up.ConclusionLBBP might be feasible and safe for NOHCM patients with conventional bradycardia pacing indication, and there is no deterioration in cardiac function and LVOTG of patients with NOHCM.
引用
收藏
页码:927 / 935
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Feasibility, safety and outcomes of upgrading to left bundle branch pacing in patients with right ventricular pacing induced cardiomyopathy
    Rademakers, Leonard M.
    Bouwmeester, Sjoerd
    Mast, Thomas P.
    Dekker, Lukas
    Houthuizen, Patrick
    Bracke, Frank A.
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 45 (06): : 726 - 732
  • [2] Comparison of Left Bundle Branch and His Bundle Pacing in Bradycardia Patients
    Hua, Wei
    Fan, Xiaohan
    Li, Xiaofei
    Niu, Hongxia
    Gu, Min
    Ning, Xiaohui
    Hu, Yiran
    Gold, Michael R.
    Zhang, Shu
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 6 (10) : 1291 - 1299
  • [3] Left bundle branch pacing for symptomatic bradycardia: Implant success rate, safety, and pacing characteristics
    Li, Yuqiu
    Chen, Keping
    Dai, Yan
    Li, Chao
    Sun, Qi
    Chen, Ruohan
    Gold, Michael R.
    Zhang, Shu
    HEART RHYTHM, 2019, 16 (12) : 1758 - 1765
  • [4] Left bundle branch potential predicts better electrical synchrony in bradycardia patients receiving left bundle branch pacing
    Huang, Jingjuan
    Guo, Lina
    Zhang, Weiwei
    Li, Ruogu
    He, Ben
    BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [5] Feasibility, safety and outcomes of left bundle branch pacing in octogenarians
    Ponnusamy, Shunmuga Sundaram
    Bopanna, Dasarath
    Syed, Thabish
    Muthu, Giridhar
    Kumar, Surya
    INDIAN HEART JOURNAL, 2021, 73 (01) : 117 - 120
  • [6] His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing: Feasibility and safety
    Saleiro, Carolina
    Sousa, Pedro A.
    Nogueira, Catarina
    Mota, Lidia
    Almeida, Claudia
    Braganca, Gisela
    Paisana, Francisco
    REVISTA PORTUGUESA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2023, 42 (08) : 683 - 691
  • [7] Left bundle branch potential predicts better electrical synchrony in bradycardia patients receiving left bundle branch pacing
    Jingjuan Huang
    Lina Guo
    Weiwei Zhang
    Ruogu Li
    Ben He
    BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 22
  • [8] Left bundle branch pacing preserved left ventricular myocardial work in patients with bradycardia
    Chen, Huang-Chung
    Liu, Wen-Hao
    Chen, Yung-Lung
    Lee, Wei-Chieh
    Fang, Yen-Nan
    Chong, Shaur-Zheng
    Chen, Mien-Cheng
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2023, 10
  • [9] Left bundle branch pacing on mechanical synchrony and myocardial work in bradycardia patients
    Wang, PeiWei
    Yang, Li
    Zheng, ShaoXin
    Mai, JingTing
    Wei, YuLing
    Liu, YingMei
    Deng, BingQing
    Lv, HanLu
    Chen, YangXin
    Qiu, Qiong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2023, 39 (02) : 369 - 378
  • [10] Autothreshold algorithm feasibility and safety in left bundle branch pacing
    Sola-Garcia, Elena
    Molina-Lerma, Manuel
    Jimenez-Jaimez, Juan
    Macias-Ruiz, Rosa
    Sanchez-Millan, Pablo J.
    Tercedor, Luis
    Alvarez, Miguel
    EUROPACE, 2023, 26 (01):