Effect of high fidelity simulation on clinical decision-making among nursing students

被引:26
作者
Ayed, Ahmad [1 ]
Malak, Malakeh Z. [1 ,2 ]
Alamer, Rsmieh M. [3 ,4 ]
Batran, Ahmad [1 ]
Salameh, Basma [1 ]
Fashafsheh, Imad [1 ]
机构
[1] Arab Amer Univ, Fac Nursing, Pediat Hlth Nursing, Jenin, Palestine
[2] Zaytoonah Univ Jordan, Fac Nursing, Commun Hlth Nursing, Amman, Jordan
[3] Isra Univ, Fac Nursing, Mental Hlth Nursing, Amman, Jordan
[4] Western Sydney Univ, Sch Nursing & Midwifer, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Decision-making; high fidelity simulation; nursing students;
D O I
10.1080/10494820.2021.1875004
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
It became necessary to integrate alternative teaching methods having excellent results in the nursing curriculum such as high-fidelity human patient simulation. High fidelity simulation improves nursing students' thinking, and emotional and decision-making capabilities. The pretest - posttest control group design was conducted to examine the effect of high-fidelity simulation (HFS) intervention on clinical decision-making for pediatric nursing students at the Arab American University in Palestine. One hundred fifty participants took part in the present study, where 50% (n = 75) were in each of the intervention and control groups. The intervention group received theory-based learning and high fidelity simulation, while the control group was provided with theory based learning and usual training in the nursing laboratory. Findings showed that after implementing the intervention, a significant change was noticed in means of clinical decision-making between the control and intervention groups. Therefore, high fidelity simulation intervention was effective, thus it could benefit the nursing students by enhancing clinical decision-making. The results support nursing educators and universities especially in developing countries to adopt such an intervention strategy for nursing students.
引用
收藏
页码:2185 / 2193
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Baraz Shahram, 2015, J Educ Health Promot, V4, P52, DOI 10.4103/2277-9531.162345
[2]  
Benner P., 2010, ED NURSING CALL RADI
[3]  
Benner P., 2008, CLIN REASONING DECIS
[4]  
Bulman C., 2013, Reflective practice in nursing, V5th
[6]   Evaluation of tools used to measure critical thinking development in nursing and midwifery undergraduate students: A systematic review [J].
Carter, Amanda G. ;
Creedy, Debra K. ;
Sidebotham, Mary .
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2015, 35 (07) :864-874
[7]   Critical thinking and creativity in nursing: Learners' perspectives [J].
Chan, Zenobia C. Y. .
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2013, 33 (05) :558-563
[8]  
D'Souza M.S., 2017, International Journal of Health Sciences and Research, V7, P340
[9]  
DeBourgh G.A., 2011, CLIN SIMUL NURS, V7, pe47, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.ECNS.2009.12.009
[10]  
Fawaz M., 2018, INT J AFRICA NURSING, V9, P105, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.IJANS.2018.10.005, 10.1016/j.ijans.2018.10.005]