Multicriteria Decision-Making in Diabetes Management and Decision Support: Systematic Review

被引:4
作者
Aldaghi, Tahmineh [1 ]
Muzik, Jan [2 ]
机构
[1] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Med 1, Spin Off Co & Res Results Commercializat Ctr, Prague, Czech Republic
[2] Czech Tech Univ, Fac Biomed Engn, Dept Informat & Commun Technol Med, Studnickova 7, Prague 12800, Czech Republic
关键词
analytical hierarchy process; diabetes management; diabetes recognition; glucose management; multi-criteria decision making; technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution; decision support; diabetes; diabetic; glucose; blood sugar; review methodology; systematic review; decision making; self-management; digital health tool; ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; RISK-ASSESSMENT; CRITERIA; MODEL; PREVALENCE; FRAMEWORK; IMPACT;
D O I
10.2196/47701
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Diabetes mellitus prevalence is increasing among adults and children around the world. Diabetes care is complex; examining the diet, type of medication, diabetes recognition, and willingness to use self-management tools are just a few of the challenges faced by diabetes clinicians who should make decisions about them. Making the appropriate decisions will reduce the cost of treatment, decrease the mortality rate of diabetes, and improve the life quality of patients with diabetes. Effective decision-making is within the realm of multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques. Objective: The central objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and applicability of MCDM methods and then introduce a novel categorization framework for their use in this field. Methods: The literature search was focused on publications from 2003 to 2023. Finally, by applying the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) method, 63 articles were selected and examined. Results: The findings reveal that the use of MCDM methods in diabetes research can be categorized into 6 distinct groups: the selection of diabetes medications (19 publications), diabetes diagnosis (12 publications), meal recommendations (8 publications), diabetes management (14 publications), diabetes complication (7 publications), and estimation of diabetes prevalence (3 publications). Conclusions: Our review showed a significant portion of the MCDM literature on diabetes. The research highlights the benefits of using MCDM techniques, which are practical and effective for a variety of diabetes challenges.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 85 条
[51]   Outcome based state budget allocation for diabetes prevention programs using multi-criteria optimization with robust weights [J].
Mehrotra, Sanjay ;
Kim, Kibaek .
HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2011, 14 (04) :324-337
[52]  
Mishra Vinaytosh, 2024, Hosp Top, V102, P35, DOI 10.1080/00185868.2022.2088433
[53]   CUSTOMIZED QUALITY ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK FOR DIABETES CARE [J].
Mishra, Vinaytosh .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2020, 14 (01) :129-146
[54]   Supply chain partnership assessment of a diabetes clinic [J].
Mishra, Vinaytosh ;
Samuel, Cherian ;
Sharma, S. K. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2018, 31 (06) :646-658
[55]  
Moher D, 2009, PLOS MED, V6, DOI [10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097, 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1, 10.1136/bmj.i4086, 10.1136/bmj.b2700, 10.1136/bmj.b2535, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.07.299]
[56]   Selecting the right drug treatment for adults with type 2 diabetes [J].
Montori, Victor M. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 352
[57]  
Mühlbacher AC, 2013, VALUE HEALTH, V16, pA446
[58]   Objective Criteria in the Medicinal Therapy for Type II Diabetes: An Analysis of the Patients' Perspective with Analytic Hierarchy Process and Best-Worst Scaling [J].
Muhlbacher, A. C. ;
Bethge, S. ;
Kaczynski, A. ;
Juhnke, C. .
GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2016, 78 (05) :326-336
[59]  
Nag K, 2018, IN C IND ENG ENG MAN, P1456, DOI 10.1109/IEEM.2018.8607678
[60]   IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040 [J].
Ogurtsova, K. ;
Fernandes, J. D. da Rocha ;
Huang, Y. ;
Linnenkamp, U. ;
Guariguata, L. ;
Cho, N. H. ;
Cavan, D. ;
Shaw, J. E. ;
Makaroff, L. E. .
DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2017, 128 :40-50