Multicriteria Decision-Making in Diabetes Management and Decision Support: Systematic Review

被引:4
作者
Aldaghi, Tahmineh [1 ]
Muzik, Jan [2 ]
机构
[1] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Med 1, Spin Off Co & Res Results Commercializat Ctr, Prague, Czech Republic
[2] Czech Tech Univ, Fac Biomed Engn, Dept Informat & Commun Technol Med, Studnickova 7, Prague 12800, Czech Republic
关键词
analytical hierarchy process; diabetes management; diabetes recognition; glucose management; multi-criteria decision making; technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution; decision support; diabetes; diabetic; glucose; blood sugar; review methodology; systematic review; decision making; self-management; digital health tool; ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; RISK-ASSESSMENT; CRITERIA; MODEL; PREVALENCE; FRAMEWORK; IMPACT;
D O I
10.2196/47701
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Diabetes mellitus prevalence is increasing among adults and children around the world. Diabetes care is complex; examining the diet, type of medication, diabetes recognition, and willingness to use self-management tools are just a few of the challenges faced by diabetes clinicians who should make decisions about them. Making the appropriate decisions will reduce the cost of treatment, decrease the mortality rate of diabetes, and improve the life quality of patients with diabetes. Effective decision-making is within the realm of multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques. Objective: The central objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and applicability of MCDM methods and then introduce a novel categorization framework for their use in this field. Methods: The literature search was focused on publications from 2003 to 2023. Finally, by applying the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) method, 63 articles were selected and examined. Results: The findings reveal that the use of MCDM methods in diabetes research can be categorized into 6 distinct groups: the selection of diabetes medications (19 publications), diabetes diagnosis (12 publications), meal recommendations (8 publications), diabetes management (14 publications), diabetes complication (7 publications), and estimation of diabetes prevalence (3 publications). Conclusions: Our review showed a significant portion of the MCDM literature on diabetes. The research highlights the benefits of using MCDM techniques, which are practical and effective for a variety of diabetes challenges.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]  
Abbasi M, 2017, INT J REPROD BIOMED, V15, P109
[2]  
Abdulkareem S.A., 2022, Indones J Electr Eng Comput Sci, V25, P1167, DOI DOI 10.11591/IJEECS.V25.I2.PP1167-1176
[3]   A novel algorithm based on information diffusion and fuzzy MADM methods for analysis of damages caused by diabetes crisis [J].
Ahmadi, Khatereh ;
Ebrahimi, Morteza .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2019, 76 :205-220
[4]  
Ahmed S, 2021, 2021 INT C EL COMP C, P1, DOI [10.1109/iceccme52200.2021.9591153, DOI 10.1109/ICECCME52200.2021.9591153]
[5]   Quantitative Evaluation of Mental-Health in Type-2 Diabetes Patients Through Computational Model [J].
Alassery, Fawaz ;
Alzahrani, Ahmed ;
Khan, Asif Irshad ;
Khan, Ashi ;
Nadeem, Mohd ;
Ansari, Md Tarique Jamal .
INTELLIGENT AUTOMATION AND SOFT COMPUTING, 2022, 32 (03) :1701-1715
[6]  
Amer Diabet Assoc, 2013, DIABETES CARE, V36, pS67, DOI [10.2337/dc13-S067, 10.2337/dc11-S011, 10.2337/dc10-S011, 10.2337/dc14-S081, 10.2337/dc12-s064, 10.2337/dc12-s011, 10.2337/dc11-S062, 10.2337/dc13-S011, 10.2337/dc10-S062]
[7]  
Amin-Naseri MR, 2011, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V6729, P252, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-21524-7_30
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1981, Lect. Notes Econ. Math. Syst.
[9]  
Aruidoss M., 2013, Am. J. Inf. Syst, V1, P31
[10]   Multi-Criteria Decision Making: A Systematic Review [J].
Azhar, Nayli Adriana ;
Radzi, Nurul Asyikin Mohamed ;
Ahmad, Wan Siti Halimatul Munirah Wan .
RECENT ADVANCES IN ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING, 2021, 14 (08) :779-801