Evaluation of architectural distortion with contrast-enhanced mammography

被引:1
|
作者
Goh, Y. [1 ]
Quek, S. T. [1 ]
Pillay, P. [1 ]
Chou, C. -P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore Hosp, Dept Diagnost Imaging, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore 119074, Singapore
[2] Kaohsiung Vet Gen Hosp, Radiol Dept, 386,Dazhong 1st Rd, Kaohsiung 81362, Taiwan
关键词
BACKGROUND PARENCHYMAL ENHANCEMENT; DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS; SPECTRAL MAMMOGRAPHY; PATHOLOGICAL OUTCOMES; MRI; LIKELIHOOD; DIAGNOSIS; FOCUS; CESM; MASS;
D O I
10.1016/j.crad.2023.11.021
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Architectural distortion (AD) is the third most common abnormality detected on mammograms. In the absence of an accurate non-invasive tool to evaluate ADs, clinical management often requires surgical excision for histological diagnosis. This problem is expected to worsen with the growing use of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and the resultant increasing detection of ADs. There is therefore a great clinical need for a diagnostic imaging tool to complement non -enhanced mammography for the evaluation of AD. Contrast -enhanced mammography (CEM) is an emerging breast imaging method that uses contrast media and the principle of dual -energy subtraction to evaluate vascularity of suspicious breast lesions. CEM, a cost-effective alternative to breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), can be used to evaluate AD by juxtaposing CEM images with non -enhanced mammograms for comparison. In this review, the authors aim to provide readers with an overview of the interpretation of AD on CEM using imaging examples. Relevant imaging features of CEM and their respective significance will be matched with information from a literature review. Finally, the authors would like to highlight the added value of CEM in relevant clinical applications in the assessment of AD. (c) 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Royal College of Radiologists.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 169
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Enhancement Type at Contrast-enhanced Mammography and Association with Malignancy
    Kim, Geunwon
    Mehta, Tejas S.
    Brook, Alexander
    Du, Linda H.
    Legare, Kaila
    Phillips, Jordana
    RADIOLOGY, 2022, 305 (02) : 299 - 306
  • [22] Comparison of contrast-enhanced digital mammography and contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis for lesion assessment Comparison of contrast-enhanced
    Huang, Hailiang
    Scaduto, David A.
    Liu, Chunling
    Yang, Jie
    Zhu, Chencan
    Rinaldi, Kim
    Eisenberg, Jason
    Liu, Jingxuan
    Hoernig, Mathias
    Wicklein, Julia
    Vogt, Sebastian
    Mertelmeier, Thomas
    Fisher, Paul R.
    Zhao, Wei
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2019, 6 (03)
  • [23] Clinical evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography and contrast enhanced tomosynthesis-Comparison to contrast-enhanced breast MRI
    Chou, Chen-Pin
    Lewin, John M.
    Chiang, Chia-Ling
    Hung, Bao-Hui
    Yang, Tsung-Lung
    Huang, Jer-Shyung
    Liao, Jia-Bin
    Pan, Huay-Ben
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 84 (12) : 2501 - 2508
  • [24] Review of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography
    Lorente-Ramos, Rosa M.
    Azpeitia Arman, Javier
    CONTEMPORARY DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY, 2022, 45 (19)
  • [25] Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography
    Wong, Christopher Yung Yuen
    Lee, Shu Yi Sonia
    Mahmood, Rameysh Danovani
    SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 65 (03) : 195 - 201
  • [26] Contrast-enhanced digital mammography
    Dromain, Clarisse
    Balleyguier, Corinne
    Adler, Ghazal
    Garbay, Jean Remi
    Delaloge, Suzette
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2009, 69 (01) : 34 - 42
  • [27] BPE on contrast-enhanced mammography: relationship with breast density, age and menopausal status
    Moffa, Giuliana
    Galati, Francesca
    Spagnoli, Alessandra
    Fabrizi, Elena
    Maroncelli, Roberto
    Coppola, Sara
    Rizzo, Veronica
    Pediconi, Federica
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2025, 130 (01): : 74 - 80
  • [28] Diagnostic Performance of Contrast-enhanced Mammography: Comparison With MRI and Mammography
    Yuzkan, Sabahattin
    Cengiz, Duygu
    Hekimsoy, Ilhan
    Okcu, Ozlem Sezgin
    Oktay, Aysenur
    JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2021, 3 (04) : 448 - 454
  • [29] The accuracy of titanium contrast-enhanced mammography: a retrospective multicentric study
    Gonzalez-Huebra, Ignacio
    Malmierca, Patricia
    Elizalde, Arlette
    Etxano, Jon
    Vejborg, Ilse
    Uhlenbrock, Detlev
    Pina, Luis
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2020, 61 (10) : 1335 - 1342
  • [30] Contrast-Enhanced Mammography: Technique, Indications, and Review of Current Literature
    Hannsun, Gemmy
    Saponaro, Stephen
    Sylvan, Paul
    Elmi, Azadeh
    CURRENT RADIOLOGY REPORTS, 2021, 9 (11)