Evaluation of architectural distortion with contrast-enhanced mammography

被引:1
|
作者
Goh, Y. [1 ]
Quek, S. T. [1 ]
Pillay, P. [1 ]
Chou, C. -P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore Hosp, Dept Diagnost Imaging, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore 119074, Singapore
[2] Kaohsiung Vet Gen Hosp, Radiol Dept, 386,Dazhong 1st Rd, Kaohsiung 81362, Taiwan
关键词
BACKGROUND PARENCHYMAL ENHANCEMENT; DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS; SPECTRAL MAMMOGRAPHY; PATHOLOGICAL OUTCOMES; MRI; LIKELIHOOD; DIAGNOSIS; FOCUS; CESM; MASS;
D O I
10.1016/j.crad.2023.11.021
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Architectural distortion (AD) is the third most common abnormality detected on mammograms. In the absence of an accurate non-invasive tool to evaluate ADs, clinical management often requires surgical excision for histological diagnosis. This problem is expected to worsen with the growing use of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and the resultant increasing detection of ADs. There is therefore a great clinical need for a diagnostic imaging tool to complement non -enhanced mammography for the evaluation of AD. Contrast -enhanced mammography (CEM) is an emerging breast imaging method that uses contrast media and the principle of dual -energy subtraction to evaluate vascularity of suspicious breast lesions. CEM, a cost-effective alternative to breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), can be used to evaluate AD by juxtaposing CEM images with non -enhanced mammograms for comparison. In this review, the authors aim to provide readers with an overview of the interpretation of AD on CEM using imaging examples. Relevant imaging features of CEM and their respective significance will be matched with information from a literature review. Finally, the authors would like to highlight the added value of CEM in relevant clinical applications in the assessment of AD. (c) 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Royal College of Radiologists.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 169
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Novel scoring system using contrast-enhanced mammography to differentiate benign and malignant architectural distortion
    Renganathan, Rupa
    Subramaniam, Prema
    Mandal, Adrija
    Suganya, P.
    Shanmugam, Jeevithan
    Cherian, Mathew
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2023, 54 (01)
  • [2] Clinical utility of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography as an adjunct for tomosynthesis-detected architectural distortion
    Patel, Bhavika K.
    Naylor, Michelle E.
    Kosiorek, Heidi E.
    Lopez-Alvarez, Yania M.
    Miller, Adrian M.
    Pizzitola, Victor J.
    Pockaj, Barbara A.
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2017, 46 : 44 - 52
  • [3] Architecture distortion score (ADS) in malignancy risk stratification of architecture distortion on contrast-enhanced digital mammography
    Goh, Yonggeng
    Chan, Ching Wan
    Pillay, Premilla
    Lee, Herng-Sheng
    Pan, Huay-Ben
    Hung, Bao-Hui
    Quek, Swee Tian
    Chou, Chen-Pin
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (05) : 2657 - 2666
  • [4] Contrast-enhanced mammography in breast cancer screening
    Coffey, Kristen
    Jochelson, Maxine S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 156
  • [5] Contrast-Enhanced Mammography: A Scientific Review
    Lewin, John M.
    Patel, Bhavika K.
    Tanna, Aneri
    JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2020, 2 (01) : 7 - 15
  • [6] The Future of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography
    Covington, Matthew F.
    Pizzitola, Victor J.
    Lorans, Roxanne
    Pockaj, Barbara A.
    Northfelt, Donald W.
    Appleton, Catherine M.
    Patel, Bhavika K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 210 (02) : 292 - 300
  • [7] Contrast-enhanced mammography in the management of breast architectural distortions and avoidance of unnecessary biopsies
    Bellini, Chiara
    Pugliese, Francesca
    Bicchierai, Giulia
    Amato, Francesco
    De Benedetto, Diego
    Di Naro, Federica
    Boeri, Cecilia
    Vanzi, Ermanno
    Migliaro, Giuliano
    Incardona, Ludovica
    Tommasi, Cinzia
    Orzalesi, Lorenzo
    Miele, Vittorio
    Nori, Jacopo
    BREAST CANCER, 2024, 31 (05) : 851 - 857
  • [8] Contrast-enhanced Mammography: How Does It Work?
    Sensakovic, William F.
    Carnahan, Molly B.
    Czaplicki, Christopher D.
    Fahrenholtz, Samuel
    Panda, Anshuman
    Zhou, Yuxiang
    Pavlicek, William
    Patel, Bhavika
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2021, 41 (03) : 829 - 839
  • [9] Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography versus Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Preoperative Evaluation of Breast Cancer
    Kim, Eun Young
    Youn, Inyoung
    Lee, Kwan Ho
    Yun, Ji-Sup
    Park, Yong Lai
    Park, Chan Heun
    Moon, Juhee
    Choi, Seon Hyeong
    Choi, Yoon Jung
    Ham, Soo-Youn
    Kook, Shin Ho
    JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2018, 21 (04) : 453 - 462
  • [10] State-of-the-art for contrast-enhanced mammography
    Covington, Matthew F.
    Salmon, Samantha
    Weaver, Bradley D.
    Fajardo, Laurie L.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 97 (1156) : 695 - 704