Second grade retention: Beliefs, decision-making styles, and factors involved in the decision process

被引:1
作者
Santos, Natalie Nobrega [1 ,2 ]
Monteiro, Vera [1 ]
机构
[1] ISPA Inst Univ, Ctr Invest Educ, CIE, ISPA, Lisbon, Portugal
[2] ISPA Inst Univ, Ctr Invest Educ, CIE ISPA, Rua Jardim Tabaco 34, P-1149041 Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
decision-making process; decision-making style; grade retention; primary education; teachers' beliefs; GRADE RETENTION; TEACHERS; ACHIEVEMENT; PERSPECTIVE; MOTIVATION; PROMOTION; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.1002/pits.23130
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Grade retention decisions are high-risk because this practice can significantly affect students' academic and professional path and their socioaffective development. This study aimed to contribute to a better understanding of second-grade retention decision-making by exploring the factors the professionals consider during the retention decision-making, their beliefs about the effectiveness of grade retention, and their cognitive decision-making style. The study sets in Portugal, where second-grade retention is a common practice. One hundred ninety-four teachers answered an online questionnaire developed for this purpose. Path analysis results suggested that teachers' beliefs and decision-making styles served as a filter, defining what factors they consider relevant or not to make grade retention decisions. Intuitive experiences seem to inform teachers' grade-retention decisions, especially when they believe retention is essential for students' success. Teachers considered up to 12 factors when deciding whether to retain or promote a second-grade student. Teachers' decisions are shaped by their beliefs and intuitive experiences, influencing the factors they consider relevant during the decision process and, ultimately, the decision to retain or not a student. Intuitive experience informs teachers' retention decisions by maintaining their beliefs in the effectiveness of grade retention and guiding the factors considered during the decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:1646 / 1666
页数:21
相关论文
共 79 条
[71]   UNRAVELING TEACHERS BELIEFS ABOUT GRADE RETENTION [J].
TOMCHIN, EM ;
IMPARA, JC .
AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 1992, 29 (01) :199-223
[72]   What are Belief Systems? [J].
Uso-Domenech, J. L. ;
Nescolarde-Selva, J. .
FOUNDATIONS OF SCIENCE, 2016, 21 (01) :147-152
[73]  
Vanlommel K., 2018, THESIS U ANTWERP
[74]   Teachers' high-stakes decision making. How teaching approaches affect rational and intuitive data collection [J].
Vanlommel, Kristin ;
Van Gasse, Roos ;
Vanhoof, Jan ;
Van Petegem, Peter .
TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION, 2018, 71 :108-119
[75]   Teachers' decision-making: Data based or intuition driven? [J].
Vanlommel, Kristin ;
Van Gasse, Roos ;
Vanhoof, Jan ;
Van Petegem, Peter .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2017, 83 :75-83
[76]   Data use by teachers: the impact of motivation, decision-making style, supportive relationships and reflective capacity [J].
Vanlommel, Kristin ;
Vanhoof, Jan ;
Van Petegem, Peter .
EDUCATIONAL STUDIES, 2016, 42 (01) :36-53
[77]   Using item response theory to understand the effects of scale contextualization: An illustration using decision making style scales [J].
Voss, Nathaniel M. ;
Chlevin-Thiele, Cassandra ;
Lake, Christopher J. ;
Warren, Chi-Leigh .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TESTING, 2023, 23 (01) :34-55
[78]  
Young S., 2014, The Researcher, V26, P20
[79]   Preservice teachers' views About grade retention as an intervention for struggling students [J].
Young, Suzanne ;
Trujillo, Natasha P. ;
Bruce, Mary Alice ;
Pollard, Tracie ;
Jones, Jeff ;
Range, Bret .
PREVENTING SCHOOL FAILURE, 2019, 63 (02) :113-120