Second grade retention: Beliefs, decision-making styles, and factors involved in the decision process

被引:1
作者
Santos, Natalie Nobrega [1 ,2 ]
Monteiro, Vera [1 ]
机构
[1] ISPA Inst Univ, Ctr Invest Educ, CIE, ISPA, Lisbon, Portugal
[2] ISPA Inst Univ, Ctr Invest Educ, CIE ISPA, Rua Jardim Tabaco 34, P-1149041 Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
decision-making process; decision-making style; grade retention; primary education; teachers' beliefs; GRADE RETENTION; TEACHERS; ACHIEVEMENT; PERSPECTIVE; MOTIVATION; PROMOTION; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.1002/pits.23130
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Grade retention decisions are high-risk because this practice can significantly affect students' academic and professional path and their socioaffective development. This study aimed to contribute to a better understanding of second-grade retention decision-making by exploring the factors the professionals consider during the retention decision-making, their beliefs about the effectiveness of grade retention, and their cognitive decision-making style. The study sets in Portugal, where second-grade retention is a common practice. One hundred ninety-four teachers answered an online questionnaire developed for this purpose. Path analysis results suggested that teachers' beliefs and decision-making styles served as a filter, defining what factors they consider relevant or not to make grade retention decisions. Intuitive experiences seem to inform teachers' grade-retention decisions, especially when they believe retention is essential for students' success. Teachers considered up to 12 factors when deciding whether to retain or promote a second-grade student. Teachers' decisions are shaped by their beliefs and intuitive experiences, influencing the factors they consider relevant during the decision process and, ultimately, the decision to retain or not a student. Intuitive experience informs teachers' retention decisions by maintaining their beliefs in the effectiveness of grade retention and guiding the factors considered during the decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:1646 / 1666
页数:21
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]   Meta-analytic relations between thinking styles and intelligence [J].
Alaybek, Balca ;
Wang, Yi ;
Dalal, Reeshad S. ;
Dubrow, Samantha ;
Boemerman, Louis S. G. .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2021, 168
[2]  
ALVES M., 2004, Curriculo e avaliacao: Uma perspectiva integrada
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Technical report: Grade retention in basic and secondary education
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2020, PISA 2018 Results (Volume V): Effective Policies, Successful Schools, DOI DOI 10.1787/CA768D40-EN
[5]   Are Teachers Boundedly Rational? How Beliefs and Context Affect Decision-Making [J].
Bakshi, Prerna .
LEADERSHIP AND POLICY IN SCHOOLS, 2023, 22 (01) :261-282
[6]   Four Educational Myths That Stymie Social Justice [J].
Beswick, Joan F. ;
Sloat, Elizabeth A. ;
Willms, J. Douglas .
EDUCATIONAL FORUM, 2008, 72 (02) :115-128
[7]  
Bonvin P., 2003, European Educational Research Journal, V2, P277, DOI [10.2304/eerj.2003.2.2.6, DOI 10.2304/EERJ.2003.2.2.6]
[8]  
Borko H., 2008, Critical issues in mathematics education, P37, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-09673-54
[9]  
Buehl M.M. Beck., 2015, INT HDB RES TEACHERS, P66, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203108437
[10]  
Byrnes D.A., 1989, FLUNKING GRADES RES, P108