Muscle Belly Repair: Biomechanical Assessment of the Anchor Suture and the Modified Kessler Techniques

被引:0
|
作者
Julien, Terrill P. [1 ]
Li, Guoan [2 ]
Mudgal, Chaitanya S. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Midatlantic Permanente Med Grp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Dist Columbia & Southern Maryland, Rockville, MD USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Newton Wellesley Hosp, Orthopaed Bioengn Lab, Newton, MA USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Orthopaed Hand Serv, Orthopaed Surg, Boston, MA USA
[4] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Yawkey Ctr, Orthopaed Hand Serv, Suite 2100,55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
Muscle; Belly; Laceration; Repair; Technique; PECTORALIS MAJOR MUSCLE; TRAUMATIC CLOSED TRANSECTION; SURGICAL REPAIR; RUPTURE; LACERATION; INJURIES;
D O I
10.1142/S2424835523500583
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Treatment of muscle belly lacerations remains a problem for surgeons. Inadequate repair of lacerations can cause functional disability. To date, there is no consensus on the method of repair for these injuries. We have previously described a technique of repairing mid-substance muscle belly lacerations. The aim of this study was to determine the ultimate strength of an intact muscle belly and to compare the anchor suture (AS) technique with the modified Kessler (MK) technique.Methods: Fifteen fresh frozen hind-legs from adolescent pigs were divided into three groups and used for the testing. Each group consisted of five specimens. Group one was the intact control group, group two was repaired with the MK technique and group three was repaired with the AS technique. Following repair, the muscles were secured in a custom-made fixation apparatus and underwent linear tensioning at a rate of 25 mm/min, generating a load-displacement curve for each specimen. The data regarding ultimate strength, modes of failure and number of intact suture/anchor constructs (for groups 2 and 3) was calculated.Results: The ultimate strength of the intact muscle group of was found to be 608.1 +/- 107.9 N. This was significantly (p < 0.05) higher than the pull-out strength of the MK and AS groups. The pull-out strength of the AS group was 143.1 +/- 36.7 N, nearly twice that of the MK group 69.8 +/- 16.4 N (p = 0.11). Suture pull-out was the most common mode of failure.Conclusions: The AS technique was found to have both higher strain and nearly twice the ultimate pull-out strength compared to the MK repair group. We suggest the AS technique as a viable technique for mid-substance muscle belly repairs.
引用
收藏
页码:513 / 521
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Biomechanical comparison of Bunnell, modified Kessler, and Tsuge tendon repair techniques using two suture types
    Dundar, Nuh
    Guneri, Bulent
    Uzel, Murat
    Doganer, Adem
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA, 2020, 54 (01) : 104 - 112
  • [2] Biomechanical Evaluation of Suture Anchor versus Transosseous Tunnel Patellar Tendon Repair Techniques
    Sherman, Seth L.
    Black, Brandee
    Mooberry, Matthew A.
    Freeman, Katie L.
    Gulbrandsen, Trevor R.
    Milles, Jeffrey L.
    Evans, Laura
    Flood, David
    Pfeiffer, Ferris
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2019, 32 (08) : 825 - 831
  • [3] Acute Achilles tendon rupture: Mini-incision repair with double-Tsuge loop suture vs. open repair with modified Kessler suture
    Fu, Chongyang
    Qu, Wei
    SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND, 2015, 13 (04): : 207 - 212
  • [4] Pectoralis major tendon repair: a biomechanical study of suture button versus transosseous suture techniques
    Thomas, William
    Gheduzzi, Sabina
    Packham, Iain
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2015, 23 (09) : 2617 - 2623
  • [5] Biomechanical Evaluation of Proximal Hamstring Repair: All-Suture Anchor Versus Titanium Suture Anchor
    Otto, Alexander
    DiCosmo, Alyssa M.
    Baldino, Joshua B.
    Mehl, Julian
    Obopilwe, Elifho
    Cote, Mark P.
    Imhoff, Andreas B.
    Beitzel, Knut
    Mazzocca, Augustus D.
    Coyner, Katherine
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 8 (01)
  • [6] A Biomechanical Analysis of the Interlock Suture and a Modified Kessler-Loop Lock Flexor Tendon Suture
    Yang, Wenfeng
    Qiao, Dan
    Ren, Yuanfei
    Dong, Yvjin
    Shang, Yaohua
    Zhang, Tiehui
    CLINICS, 2017, 72 (09) : 582 - 587
  • [7] Biomechanical Comparison of an All-Soft Suture Anchor With a Modified Brostrom-Gould Suture Repair for Lateral Ligament Reconstruction
    Brown, Christopher A.
    Hurwit, Daniel
    Behn, Anthony
    Hunt, Kenneth J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2014, 42 (02) : 417 - 422
  • [8] A biomechanical comparison of Achilles tendon suture repair techniques: Locking Block Modified Krackow, Kessler, and Percutaneous Achilles Repair System with the early rehabilitation program in vitro bovine model
    Tian, Jian
    Rui, Yongjun
    Xu, Yajun
    Yang, Wengbo
    Xu, Tonglong
    Chen, Xueming
    Zhang, Xingfei
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2020, 140 (11) : 1775 - 1782
  • [9] Proximal Hamstring Repair: A Biomechanical Analysis of Variable Suture Anchor Constructs
    Gerhardt, Michael B.
    Assenmacher, Benjamin S.
    Chahla, Jorge
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2019, 7 (02):
  • [10] Anatomic Knot Suture Anchor Versus Knotless Suture Anchor Technique for Anterior Talofibular Ligament Repair: A Biomechanical Comparison
    Li, Hong
    Xu, Hanlin
    Hua, Yinghui
    Chen, Wenbo
    Li, Hongyun
    Chen, Shiyi
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 8 (01)