The prognostic utility of prehospital qSOFA in addition to emergency department qSOFA for sepsis in patients with suspected infection: A retrospective cohort study

被引:5
作者
Saito, Ayaka [1 ]
Osawa, Itsuki [2 ]
Shibata, Junichiro [1 ]
Sonoo, Tomohiro [3 ,4 ]
Nakamura, Kensuke [4 ]
Goto, Tadahiro [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Fac Med, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Univ Tokyo Hosp, Dept Emergency & Crit Care Med, Tokyo, Japan
[3] TXP Med Co Ltd, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Hitachi Gen Hosp, Dept Emergency & Crit Care Med, Ibaraki, Japan
[5] Univ Tokyo, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Hlth Econ, Tokyo, Japan
来源
PLOS ONE | 2023年 / 18卷 / 02期
关键词
ORGAN FAILURE ASSESSMENT; INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE SYNDROME; CLINICAL-CRITERIA; MORTALITY; IMPUTATION; ACCURACY; SOFA;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0282148
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) was widely used to estimate the risks of sepsis in patients with suspected infection in the prehospital and emergency department (ED) settings. Due to the insufficient sensitivity of qSOFA on arrival at the ED (ED qSOFA), the Surviving Sepsis Campaign 2021 recommended against using qSOFA as a single screening tool for sepsis. However, it remains unclear whether the combined use of prehospital and ED qSOFA improves its sensitivity for identifying patients at a higher risk of sepsis at the ED. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the data from the ED of a tertiary medical center in Japan from April 2018 through March 2021. Among all adult patients (aged >= 18 years) transported by ambulance to the ED with suspected infection, we identified patients who were subsequently diagnosed with sepsis based on the Sepsis-3 criteria. We compared the predictive abilities of prehospital qSOFA, ED qSOFA, and the sum of prehospital and ED qSOFA (combined qSOFA) for sepsis in patients with suspected infection at the ED. ResultsAmong 2,407 patients with suspected infection transported to the ED by ambulance, 369 (15%) patients were subsequently diagnosed with sepsis, and 217 (9%) died during hospitalization. The sensitivity of prehospital qSOFA >= 2 and ED qSOFA >= 2 were comparable (c-statistics for sepsis [95%CI], 0.57 [0.52-0.62] vs. 0.55 [0.50-0.60]). However, combined qSOFA (cutoff, >= 3 [max 6]) was more sensitive than ED qSOFA (cutoff, >= 2) for identifying sepsis (0.67 [95%CI, 0.62-0.72] vs. 0.55 [95%CI, 0.50-0.60]). Using combined qSOFA, we identified 44 (12%) out of 369 patients who were subsequently diagnosed with sepsis, which would have been missed using ED qSOFA alone. ConclusionsUsing both prehospital and ED qSOFA could improve the screening ability of sepsis among patients with suspected infection at the ED.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], MISSFOREST NONPARAME
  • [2] SEPSIS CLINICAL CRITERIA IN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT PATIENTS ADMITTED TO AN INTENSIVE CARE UNIT: AN EXTERNAL VALIDATION STUDY OF QUICK SEQUENTIAL ORGAN FAILURE ASSESSMENT
    April, Michael D.
    Aguirre, Jose
    Tannenbaum, Lloyd I.
    Moore, Tyler
    Pingree, Alexander
    Thaxton, Robert E.
    Sessions, Daniel J.
    Lantry, James H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2017, 52 (05) : 622 - 631
  • [3] The quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) identifies septic patients in the out-of-hospital setting
    Barbara, Paul
    Graziano, Christopher
    Caputo, William
    Litvak, Ilya
    Battinelli, Dominick
    Hahn, Barry
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 36 (06) : 1022 - 1026
  • [4] Predicting mortality in patients with suspected sepsis at the Emergency Department; A retrospective cohort study comparing qSOFA, SIRS and National Early Warning Score
    Brink, Anniek
    Alsma, Jelmer
    Verdonschot, Rob Johannes Carel Gerardus
    Rood, Pleunie Petronella Marie
    Zietse, Robert
    Lingsma, Hester Floor
    Schuit, Stephanie Catherine Elisabeth
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (01):
  • [5] Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment; Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, and Early Warning Scores for Detecting Clinical Deterioration in Infected Patients outside the Intensive Care Unit
    Churpek, Matthew M.
    Snyder, Ashley
    Han, Xuan
    Sokol, Sarah
    Pettit, Natasha
    Howell, Michael D.
    Edelson, Dana P.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2017, 195 (07) : 906 - 911
  • [6] The initial resuscitation of septic shock
    Cinel, Ismail
    Kasapoglu, Umut S.
    Gul, Fethi
    Dellinger, R. Phillip
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2020, 57 : 108 - 117
  • [7] Development and Evaluation of a Machine Learning Model for the Early Identification of Patients at Risk for Sepsis
    Delahanty, Ryan J.
    Alvarez, JoAnn
    Flynn, Lisa M.
    Sherwin, Robert L.
    Jones, Spencer S.
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 73 (04) : 334 - 344
  • [8] COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH
    DELONG, ER
    DELONG, DM
    CLARKEPEARSON, DI
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) : 837 - 845
  • [9] qSOFA Has Poor Sensitivity for Prehospital Identification of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock
    Dorsett, Maia
    Kroll, Melissa
    Smith, Clark S.
    Asaro, Phillip
    Liang, Stephen Y.
    Moy, Hawnwan P.
    [J]. PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE, 2017, 21 (04) : 489 - 497
  • [10] Evans L, 2021, INTENS CARE MED, V47, P1181, DOI [10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y, 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005337]