More ethics in the laboratory, please! Scientists' perspectives on ethics in the preclinical phase

被引:2
作者
Buedo, Paola [1 ]
Prieto, Eugenia [2 ]
Perek-Bialas, Jolanta [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Odziemczyk-Stawarz, Idalina [6 ]
Waligora, Marcin [1 ]
机构
[1] Jagiellonian Univ, Res Eth Med Study Grp REMEDY, Med Coll, Krakow, Poland
[2] Consejo Nacl Invest Cient & Tecn CONICET, Inst Divers & Evoluc Austral IDEAus, Puerto Madryn, Argentina
[3] Jagiellonian Univ, Inst Sociol, Warsaw, Poland
[4] Jagiellonian Univ, Ctr Evaluat & Publ Policy Anal, Warsaw, Poland
[5] Warsaw Sch Econ, Warsaw, Poland
[6] Jagiellonian Univ, Doctoral Sch Social Sci Sociol Sci, Krakow, Poland
来源
ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-ETHICS INTEGRITY AND POLICY | 2025年 / 32卷 / 04期
关键词
Preclinical research; bioethics; integrity; biotechnology; biomedical research; VIEWS;
D O I
10.1080/08989621.2023.2294996
中图分类号
R-052 [医学伦理学];
学科分类号
0101 ; 120402 ;
摘要
In recent years there have been calls to improve ethics in preclinical research. Promoting ethics in preclinical research should consider the perspectives of scientists. Our study aims to explore researchers' perspectives on ethics in the preclinical phase. Using interviews and focus groups, we collected views on ethical issues in preclinical research from experienced (n = 11) and early-stage researchers (ESRs) (n = 14) working in a gene therapy and regenerative medicine consortium. A recurring theme among ESRs was the impact of health-related preclinical research on climate change. They highlighted the importance of strengthening ethics in relations within the scientific community. Experienced researchers were focused on technicalities of methods used in preclinical research. They stressed the need for more safeguards to protect the sensitive personal data they work with. Both groups drew attention to the importance of the social context of research and its social impact. They agreed that it is important to be socially responsible - to be aware of and be sensitive to the needs and views of society. This study helps to identify key ethical challenges and, when combined with more data, can ultimately lead to informed and evidence-based improvements to existing regulations.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 458
页数:16
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Bergin T., 2018, INTRO DATA ANAL QUAN
[2]   Bioethics of somatic gene therapy: what do we know so far? [J].
Buedo, Paola ;
Bianchini, Alahi ;
Klas, Katarzyna ;
Waligora, Marcin .
CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2023, 39 (10) :1355-1365
[3]   How to embed ethics into laboratory research [J].
Buedo, Paola ;
Odziemczyk, Idalina ;
Perek-Bialas, Jolanta ;
Waligora, Marcin .
ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-ETHICS INTEGRITY AND POLICY, 2024, 31 (07) :767-785
[4]  
Buljan Ivan, 2021, F1000Res, V10, P471, DOI 10.12688/f1000research.52965.1
[5]   A phenomenographic study of scientists' beliefs about the causes of scientists' research misconduct [J].
Cairns, Aidan C. ;
Linville, Caleb ;
Garcia, Tyler ;
Bridges, Bill ;
Tanona, Scott ;
Herington, Jonathan ;
Laverty, James T. .
RESEARCH ETHICS, 2021, 17 (04) :501-521
[6]  
Costa HS, 2011, NANOMEDICINE-UK, V6, P681, DOI [10.2217/nnm.11.9, 10.2217/NNM.11.9]
[7]   STEER: Factors to Consider When Designing Online Focus Groups Using Audiovisual Technology in Health Research [J].
Daniels, Nicola ;
Gillen, Patricia ;
Casson, Karen ;
Wilson, Iseult .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2019, 18
[8]   An Ethics of the System: Talking to Scientists About Research Integrity [J].
Davies, Sarah R. .
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2019, 25 (04) :1235-1253
[9]   Ethics appraisal procedure in 79,670 Marie Skodowska-Curie proposals from the entire European HORIZON 2020 research and innovation program (2014-2020): A retrospective analysis [J].
De Waele, Ilse ;
Wizel, David ;
Puljak, Livia ;
Koporc, Zvonimir .
PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (11)
[10]  
Dodson R., 2014, SUCCESS ACAD SURG BA, P215