Use of minimal working memory in visual comparison: An eye-tracking study

被引:0
作者
Li, Yijing [1 ]
Zhuang, Xiangling [1 ]
Ma, Guojie [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Shaanxi Normal Univ, Sch Psychol, Shaanxi Key Lab Behav & Cognit Neurosci, Xian, Peoples R China
[2] Shaanxi Normal Univ, Sch Psychol, 199 South Changan Rd, Xian 710062, Peoples R China
关键词
comparative visual search task; minimal use of working memory; eye tracking; saccade strategy; SEARCH; MOVEMENTS; SPAN; INFORMATION; DIFFERENCE; ATTENTION; FIXATION; PARALLEL; FEATURES; STIMULUS;
D O I
10.1177/03010066231194488
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
In this study, we used a novel application of the previous paradigm provided by Pomplun to examine the eye movement strategies of using minimal working memory in visual comparison. This paradigm includes two tasks: one is a free comparison and the other is a single sequential comparison. In the free comparison, participants can freely view two horizontally presented stimuli until they judge whether the two stimuli are the same or not. In the single sequential comparison, participants can only view the left-side stimuli one time, and when their eyes cross the invisible boundary at the center of the screen, the left-side stimuli disappear and the right-side stimuli appear. Participants need to judge whether the right-side stimuli are the same as the disappeared left-side stimuli. Eye movement data showed significant differences between the single sequential comparison and free comparison tasks that suggests the use of minimal working memory in free comparison. Moreover, when the number of items was more than three, an average of 2.87 items would be processed in each view sequence. Participants also used the alternating left-right reference strategy that made the shortest scan path with the use of minimal working memory. The typical eye movement strategy in visual comparison and its theoretical significance were discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:759 / 773
页数:15
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Cultural differences in attention: Eye movement evidence from a comparative visual search task [J].
Alotaibi, Albandri ;
Underwood, Geoffrey ;
Smith, Alastair D. .
CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2017, 55 :254-265
[2]   Eye movements during visual search: the costs of choosing the optimal path [J].
Araujo, C ;
Kowler, E ;
Pavel, M .
VISION RESEARCH, 2001, 41 (25-26) :3613-3625
[3]   Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition [J].
Ballard, DH ;
Hayhoe, MM ;
Pook, PK ;
Rao, RPN .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 1997, 20 (04) :723-+
[4]  
Bauhoff V., 2010, J VISION, V10, P1309, DOI [10.1167/10.7.1309, DOI 10.1167/10.7.1309]
[5]  
Bauhoff V., 2011, J VISION, V11, P1325, DOI [10.1167/11.11.1325, DOI 10.1167/11.11.1325]
[6]   Distance Matters: Spatial Contiguity Effects as Trade-Off between Gaze Switches and Memory Load [J].
Bauhoff, Vera ;
Huff, Markus ;
Schwan, Stephan .
APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 26 (06) :863-871
[7]   Eye movements and the span of the effective stimulus in visual search [J].
Bertera, JH ;
Rayner, K .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2000, 62 (03) :576-585
[8]  
BISCALDI M, 1995, STUD VIS INFORM PROC, V6, P145
[9]   HEMISPHERIC DIFFERENCES IN SERIAL VERSUS PARALLEL PROCESSING [J].
COHEN, G .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1973, 97 (03) :349-356
[10]   PARALLEL VERSUS SERIAL PROCESSES IN MULTIDIMENSIONAL STIMULUS DISCRIMINATION [J].
EGETH, HE .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1966, 1 (08) :245-252