Global land-use and sustainability implications of enhanced bioenergy import of China

被引:9
作者
Wu, Yazhen [1 ,2 ]
Deppermann, Andre [2 ]
Havlik, Petr [2 ]
Frank, Stefan [2 ]
Ren, Ming [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Hao [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Ma, Lin [4 ]
Fang, Chen [1 ]
Chen, Qi [1 ]
Dai, Hancheng [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Coll Environm Sci & Engn, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[2] Int Inst Appl Syst Anal IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Coll Environm & Resource Sci, Hangzhou 310058, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Genet & Dev Biol, Ctr Agr Resources Res, Key Lab Agr Water Resources,Hebei Key Lab Soil Ec, Shijiazhuang, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[6] Peking Univ, Inst Global Hlth & Dev, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Bioenergy; 1; 5?C; International trade; Land -use change; GLOBIOM; TRADE; IMPACTS; BIOMASS; FUTURE; ENERGY; SCENARIOS; EMISSIONS; TARGETS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.120769
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Most ambitious climate change mitigation pathways indicate multifold bioenergy expansion to support the en-ergy transition, which may trigger increased biomass imports from major bioenergy-consuming regions. How-ever, the potential global land-use change and sustainability trade-offs alongside the bioenergy trade remain poorly understood. Here, we apply the Global Biosphere Management Model (GLOBIOM) to investigate and compare the effects of different increasing bioenergy import strategies in line with the 1.5 degrees C-compatible bio-energy demand in China, which is projected to represent 30% of global bioenergy consumption by the middle of the century. The results show that sourcing additional bioenergy from different world regions could pose het-erogeneous impacts on the local and global land systems, with implications on food security, greenhouse gas emissions, and water and fertilizer demand. In the worst cases under strict trade settings, relying on biomass import may induce up to 25% of unmanaged forests converted to managed ones in the supplying regions, while in an open trade environment, increasing bioenergy imports would drastically change the trade flows of staple agricultural or forestry products, which would further bring secondary land-use changes in other world regions. Nevertheless, an economically optimized biomass import portfolio for China has the potential to reduce global overall sustainability trade-offs with food security and emission abatement. However, these benefits vary with indicator and time and are conditional on stricter land-use regulations. Our findings thus shed new light on the design of bioenergy trade strategies and the associated land-use regulations in individual countries in the era of deep decarbonization.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 86 条
  • [11] Bradley D, 2013, IEA BIOENERGY TASK, P40
  • [12] Quantifying the global cropland footprint of the European Union's non-food bioeconomy
    Bruckner, Martin
    Hayha, Tiina
    Giljum, Stefan
    Maus, Victor
    Fischer, Guenther
    Tramberend, Sylvia
    Boerner, Jan
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 14 (04)
  • [13] Reconciling regional nitrogen boundaries with global food security
    Chang, Jinfeng
    Havlik, Petr
    Leclere, David
    de Vries, Wim
    Valin, Hugo
    Deppermann, Andre
    Hasegawa, Tomoko
    Obersteiner, Michael
    [J]. NATURE FOOD, 2021, 2 (09): : 700 - +
  • [14] Implications of climate change mitigation strategies on international bioenergy trade
    Daioglou, Vassilis
    Muratori, Matteo
    Lamers, Patrick
    Fujimori, Shinichiro
    Kitous, Alban
    Koberle, Alexandre C.
    Bauer, Nico
    Junginger, Martin
    Kato, Etsushi
    Leblanc, Florian
    Mima, Silvana
    Wise, Marshal
    van Vuuren, Detlef P.
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2020, 163 (03) : 1639 - 1658
  • [15] The market impacts of shortening feed supply chains in Europe
    Deppermann, Andre
    Havlik, Petr
    Valin, Hugo
    Boere, Esther
    Herrero, Mario
    Vervoort, Joost
    Mathijs, Erik
    [J]. FOOD SECURITY, 2018, 10 (06) : 1401 - 1410
  • [16] Land-use change to bioenergy production in Europe: implications for the greenhouse gas balance and soil carbon
    Don, Axel
    Osborne, Bruce
    Hastings, Astley
    Skiba, Ute
    Carter, Mette S.
    Drewer, Julia
    Flessa, Heinz
    Freibauer, Annette
    Hyvonen, Niina
    Jones, Mike B.
    Lanigan, Gary J.
    Mander, Uelo
    Monti, Andrea
    Djomo, Sylvestre Njakou
    Valentine, John
    Walter, Katja
    Zegada-Lizarazu, Walter
    Zenone, Terenzio
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2012, 4 (04): : 372 - 391
  • [17] Assessing China's efforts to pursue the 1.5°C warming limit
    Duan, Hongbo
    Zhou, Sheng
    Jiang, Kejun
    Bertram, Christoph
    Harmsen, Mathijs
    Kriegler, Elmar
    van Vuuren, Detlef P.
    Wang, Shouyang
    Fujimori, Shinichiro
    Tavoni, Massimo
    Ming, Xi
    Keramidas, Kimon
    Iyer, Gokul
    Edmonds, James
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2021, 372 (6540) : 378 - +
  • [18] The economics of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) deployment in a 1.5 °C or 2 °C world
    Fajardy, Mathilde
    Morris, Jennifer
    Gurgel, Angelo
    Herzog, Howard
    Mac Dowell, Niall
    Paltsev, Sergey
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2021, 68
  • [19] [樊静丽 Fan Jingli], 2021, [热力发电, Thermal Power Generation], V50, P7
  • [20] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2022, FAOSTAT DAT