Global land-use and sustainability implications of enhanced bioenergy import of China

被引:9
作者
Wu, Yazhen [1 ,2 ]
Deppermann, Andre [2 ]
Havlik, Petr [2 ]
Frank, Stefan [2 ]
Ren, Ming [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Hao [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Ma, Lin [4 ]
Fang, Chen [1 ]
Chen, Qi [1 ]
Dai, Hancheng [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Coll Environm Sci & Engn, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[2] Int Inst Appl Syst Anal IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Coll Environm & Resource Sci, Hangzhou 310058, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Genet & Dev Biol, Ctr Agr Resources Res, Key Lab Agr Water Resources,Hebei Key Lab Soil Ec, Shijiazhuang, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[6] Peking Univ, Inst Global Hlth & Dev, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Bioenergy; 1; 5?C; International trade; Land -use change; GLOBIOM; TRADE; IMPACTS; BIOMASS; FUTURE; ENERGY; SCENARIOS; EMISSIONS; TARGETS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.120769
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Most ambitious climate change mitigation pathways indicate multifold bioenergy expansion to support the en-ergy transition, which may trigger increased biomass imports from major bioenergy-consuming regions. How-ever, the potential global land-use change and sustainability trade-offs alongside the bioenergy trade remain poorly understood. Here, we apply the Global Biosphere Management Model (GLOBIOM) to investigate and compare the effects of different increasing bioenergy import strategies in line with the 1.5 degrees C-compatible bio-energy demand in China, which is projected to represent 30% of global bioenergy consumption by the middle of the century. The results show that sourcing additional bioenergy from different world regions could pose het-erogeneous impacts on the local and global land systems, with implications on food security, greenhouse gas emissions, and water and fertilizer demand. In the worst cases under strict trade settings, relying on biomass import may induce up to 25% of unmanaged forests converted to managed ones in the supplying regions, while in an open trade environment, increasing bioenergy imports would drastically change the trade flows of staple agricultural or forestry products, which would further bring secondary land-use changes in other world regions. Nevertheless, an economically optimized biomass import portfolio for China has the potential to reduce global overall sustainability trade-offs with food security and emission abatement. However, these benefits vary with indicator and time and are conditional on stricter land-use regulations. Our findings thus shed new light on the design of bioenergy trade strategies and the associated land-use regulations in individual countries in the era of deep decarbonization.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 86 条
  • [1] Carbon Sequestration by Perennial Energy Crops: Is the Jury Still Out?
    Agostini, Francesco
    Gregory, Andrew S.
    Richter, Goetz M.
    [J]. BIOENERGY RESEARCH, 2015, 8 (03) : 1057 - 1080
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2010, Renewable Fuel Standard
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2021, Technical Report
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2011, Renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation: Special report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2021, Renewables 2021: Analysis and forecast to 2026
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2021, State and Trends of Carbon Pricing
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2020, Global Bioenergy Statistics 2020
  • [8] Global wheat production potentials and management flexibility under the representative concentration pathways
    Balkovic, Juraj
    van der Velde, Marijn
    Skalsky, Rastislav
    Xiong, Wei
    Folberth, Christian
    Khabarov, Nikolay
    Smirnov, Alexey
    Mueller, Nathaniel D.
    Obersteiner, Michael
    [J]. GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE, 2014, 122 : 107 - 121
  • [9] Bio-energy and CO2 emission reductions: an integrated land-use and energy sector perspective
    Bauer, Nico
    Klein, David
    Humpenoeder, Florian
    Kriegler, Elmar
    Luderer, Gunnar
    Popp, Alexander
    Strefler, Jessica
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2020, 163 (03) : 1675 - 1693
  • [10] Global energy sector emission reductions and bioenergy use: overview of the bioenergy demand phase of the EMF-33 model comparison
    Bauer, Nico
    Rose, Steven K.
    Fujimori, Shinichiro
    van Vuuren, Detlef P.
    Weyant, John
    Wise, Marshall
    Cui, Yiyun
    Daioglou, Vassilis
    Gidden, Matthew J.
    Kato, Etsushi
    Kitous, Alban
    Leblanc, Florian
    Sands, Ronald
    Sano, Fuminori
    Strefler, Jessica
    Tsutsui, Junichi
    Bibas, Ruben
    Fricko, Oliver
    Hasegawa, Tomoko
    Klein, David
    Kurosawa, Atsushi
    Mima, Silvana
    Muratori, Matteo
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2020, 163 (03) : 1553 - 1568