The community mental health team fidelity scale: A measure of program fidelity of social networks interventions for severe mental illness

被引:1
作者
Alvarez-Monjaras, Mauricio [1 ]
Lotmore, Melissa [1 ]
Razzaque, Russell [2 ]
Hopfenbeck, Mark Steven [3 ]
Pilling, Stephen [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Clin Educ & Hlth Psychol, London, England
[2] North East London NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
[3] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Hlth Sci, Trondheim, Sor Trondelag, Norway
关键词
open dialogue; fidelity; implementation science; community mental health; measure development; severe mental illness; complex interventions; OPEN-DIALOGUE APPROACH; CRISIS RESOLUTION; COEFFICIENT ALPHA; ACUTE-PSYCHOSIS; OUTCOMES; QUALITY; CARE;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1076791
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Open dialogue (OD) is a multi-component therapeutic and organizational intervention for crisis and continuing community mental health care with a therapeutic focus on clients' social networks. The development and implementation of this model of care in the United Kingdom requires considerable contextual adaptations which need to be assessed to support effective implementation. Program fidelity-the extent to which core components of an intervention are delivered as intended by an intervention protocol at all levels-is crucial for these adaptations. AimsTo develop, pilot, and implement a program fidelity measure for community mental health services providing OD and 'treatment as usual' (TAU) or standard NHS crisis and community care. MethodsMeasure structure, content, and scoring were developed and refined through an iterative process of discussion between the research team and OD experts. Measure was piloted in the 6 OD and 6 TAU services participating in a large-scale research program. ResultsInitial data suggests that the Community Mental Health Team Fidelity Scale (COM-FIDE) is a potentially reliable and feasible measure of the fidelity of community mental health services and specific OD components of such services.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 62 条
[41]  
Ramboll, 2014, ABEN DIAL 2 MAN
[42]   Open Dialogue and its Relevance to the NHS: Opinions of NHS Staff and Service Users [J].
Razzaque, Russell ;
Wood, Lisa .
COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH JOURNAL, 2015, 51 (08) :931-938
[43]  
Razzaque Russell., 2016, BJPsych Advances, V22, P348, DOI DOI 10.1192/APT.BP.115.015230
[44]   Intervention fidelity [J].
Santacroce, SJ ;
Maccarelli, LM ;
Grey, M .
NURSING RESEARCH, 2004, 53 (01) :63-66
[45]   Toward the Effective and Efficient Measurement of Implementation Fidelity [J].
Schoenwald, Sonja K. ;
Garland, Ann F. ;
Chapman, Jason E. ;
Frazier, Stacy L. ;
Sheidow, Ashli J. ;
Southam-Gerow, Michael A. .
ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2011, 38 (01) :32-43
[46]   The open dialogue approach to acute psychosis: Its poetics and micropolitics [J].
Seikkula, J ;
Olson, ME .
FAMILY PROCESS, 2003, 42 (03) :403-418
[47]   Open dialogue in psychosis II: A comparison of good and poor outcome cases [J].
Seikkula, J ;
Alakare, B ;
Aaltonen, J .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIVIST PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 14 (04) :267-284
[48]   Open dialogue in psychosis I: An introduction and case illustration [J].
Seikkula, J ;
Alakare, B ;
Aaltonen, J .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIVIST PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 14 (04) :247-265
[49]  
Seikkula J., 2003, ETHICAL HUMAN SCI SE, V5, P163, DOI DOI 10.1891/1523-150X.5.3.163
[50]  
Seikkula J., 2006, Dialogical Meetings in Social Networks