Opposite and dynamic regulation of the interferon response in metastatic and non-metastatic breast cancer

被引:10
|
作者
Lamsal, Apsana [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Andersen, Sonja Benedikte [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Johansson, Ida [1 ]
Vietri, Marina [4 ,5 ]
Bokil, Ansooya Avinash [2 ,3 ,7 ]
Kurganovs, Natalie Jayne [6 ]
Rylander, Felicia [1 ]
Bjorkoy, Geir [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pettersen, Kristine [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Giambelluca, Miriam S. S. [2 ,3 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Nat Sci, Dept Biomed Lab Sci, Trondheim, Norway
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Ctr Mol Inflammat Res, Trondheim, Norway
[3] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Canc Res & Mol Med, Trondheim, Norway
[4] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Fac Med, Ctr Canc Cell Reprogramming, Oslo, Norway
[5] Oslo Univ Hosp, Inst Canc Res, Dept Mol Cell Biol, Oslo, Norway
[6] Oslo Univ Hosp, Inst Canc Res, Dept Tumor Biol, Oslo, Norway
[7] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Circulat & Med Imaging, Trondheim, Norway
[8] UiT The Arctic Univ Norway, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Clin Med, Tromso, Norway
关键词
66cl4; 67NR; IFN-I; Metastasis; I IFN SIGNALS; TUMOR MICROENVIRONMENT; CELL INVASION; PROMOTES; DEGRADATION; ACTIVATION; PROFILES; INNATE; LEADS;
D O I
10.1186/s12964-023-01062-y
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Background To our current understanding, solid tumors depend on suppressed local immune reactions, often elicited by the interaction between tumor cells and tumor microenvironment (TME) components. Despite an improved understanding of anti-cancer immune responses in the TME, it is still unclear how immuno-suppressive TME are formed and how some cancer cells survive and metastasize.Methods To identify the major adaptations that cancer cells undergo during tumor development and progression, we compared the transcriptome and proteome from metastatic 66cl4 and non-metastatic 67NR cell lines in culture versus their corresponding mouse mammary primary tumors. Using confocal microscopy, RT-qPCR, flow cytometry and western blotting, we studied the signaling pathway and the mechanisms involved. In addition, we used public gene expression data from human breast cancer biopsies to evaluate the correlation between gene expression and clinical outcomes in patients.Results We found that type I interferon (IFN-I) response was a key differentially regulated pathway between metastatic and non-metastatic cell lines and tumors. The IFN-I response was active in metastatic cancer cells in culture and markedly dampened when these cells formed primary tumors. Interestingly, the opposite was observed in non-metastatic cancer cells and tumors. Consistent with an active IFN-I response in culture, the metastatic cancer cells displayed elevated levels of cytosolic DNA from both mitochondria and ruptured micronuclei with concomitant activation of cGAS-STING signaling. Interestingly, decreased IFN-I-related gene expression in breast cancer biopsies correlated with an unfavourable prognosis in patients.Conclusion Our findings show that IFN-I response is dampened in the tumors with the metastatic ability and lower IFN-I expression predicts poor prognosis in triple-negative and HER2 enriched breast cancer patients. This study highlights the possibility of reactivating the IFN-I response as a potential therapeutic strategy in breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Opposite and dynamic regulation of the interferon response in metastatic and non-metastatic breast cancer
    Apsana Lamsal
    Sonja Benedikte Andersen
    Ida Johansson
    Marina Vietri
    Ansooya Avinash Bokil
    Natalie Jayne Kurganovs
    Felicia Rylander
    Geir Bjørkøy
    Kristine Pettersen
    Miriam S. Giambelluca
    Cell Communication and Signaling, 21
  • [2] Non-metastatic breast cancer
    Saglier, J
    JOURNAL DE CHIRURGIE, 2005, 142 (06): : 355 - 366
  • [3] Brain metastatic versus non-metastatic breast cancer exosomes influence astrocyte response
    Sayyad, Megan
    Puchalapalli, Madhavi
    Hu, Bin
    Koblinski, Jennifer
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 78 (13)
  • [4] Endothelial activation in non-metastatic breast cancer
    Tesarova, P.
    Barkmanova, J.
    Pazdrova, G.
    Kalousova, M.
    Mestek, O.
    Dlouha, Z.
    Zima, T.
    Petruzelka, L.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (15)
  • [5] Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer and Tree Design
    Lantheaume, S.
    Fernandez, L.
    Motak, L.
    Blois Da Conceicao, S.
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGIE, 2019, 13 (3-4) : 202 - 209
  • [6] Breast cancer treatments in non-metastatic situations
    Andre, Fabrice
    ONCOLOGIE, 2008, 10 : S71 - S73
  • [7] Intravital imaging of tumor bioenergetics in metastatic and non-metastatic breast cancer
    Rasul, Raisa
    Harper, Mason
    Rajaram, Narasimhan
    DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF DISEASES IN THE BREAST AND REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEM IV, 2018, 10472
  • [8] Optical imaging of metabolic adaptability in metastatic and non-metastatic breast cancer
    Rebello, Lisa
    Rajaram, Narasimhan
    DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF DISEASES IN THE BREAST AND REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEM IV, 2018, 10472
  • [9] Epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) phenotype in metastatic and non-metastatic breast cancer
    Lakhtakia, R.
    Al-Jarrah, A.
    Furrukh, M.
    Ganguly, S. S.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2017, 471 : S59 - S59
  • [10] Differences in lipid metabolism between non-metastatic and metastatic breast cancer cells
    Andolino, Chaylen
    Asher, Josie
    Zembroski, Alyssa S.
    Buhman, Kimberly
    Teegarden, Dorothy
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 80 (16)