A comparative investigation of syngas and biofuel power and hydrogen plant combining nanomaterial-supported solid oxide fuel cell with vanadium-chlorine thermochemical cycle

被引:15
作者
Al-Rashed, Abdullah A. A. A. [1 ]
Alsarraf, Jalal [1 ]
Alnaqi, Abdulwahab A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Coll Technol Studies, Dept Automot & Marine Engn Technol, Publ Author Appl Educ & Training, Kuwait, Kuwait
关键词
Algae biomass; SOFC; Biogas and syngas; Hydrogen; Exergy; Nanomaterial; BIOMASS GASIFICATION; INTEGRATED GASIFIER; SYSTEM; SOFC; PERFORMANCE; ENERGY; WASTE; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125910
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
In order to realize combined advantage of hydrogen and renewable energy systems, two new cogeneration of hydrogen and electricity frameworks are developed, examined and compared. The SOFC unit is applied for power production, while its waste heat is suggested to be converted to hydrogen by a thermochemical vanadium -chlorine cycle. As this method requires no electricity input, it is highly preferred to common electrolysis-based techniques for hydrogen production. The systems are fueled by algae biomass converted by either digestion or gasification for provision of biogas or syngas fuels. A theoretical investigation is presented to appraise the sys-tems' practical feasibility according to the violations imposed by thermodynamics' laws. In addition to detailed thermodynamic analyses, exergo-environmental studies are reported to estimate negative impacts of the considered frameworks. Through a sensitivity study, the influence on performance (efficiencies and product generation amounts) of design conditions are comprehensively described. The findings have shown that, generally the biogas-powered framework outperforms the syngas-powered one and the amount of superiority depends on operating conditions, ranging from 3 to 10%. Also, it is found that the syngas-powered system can generate more hydrogen and thus, if the hydrogen production is more significant than power generation the biomass gasification would be preferred over the digestion. The exergy destruction assessment within compo-nents of the two systems has indicated larger values for gasifier compared to digester due to higher rate of chemical reactions and larger temperature differences.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 43 条
[31]   Modelling system efficiencies and costs of two biomass-fuelled SOFC systems [J].
Omosun, AO ;
Bauen, A ;
Brandon, NP ;
Adjiman, CS ;
Hart, D .
JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2004, 131 (1-2) :96-106
[32]   Assessing the potential of thermo-chemical water splitting cycles: A bridge towards clean and sustainable hydrogen generation [J].
Oruc, Onur ;
Dincer, Ibrahim .
FUEL, 2021, 286
[33]   Life cycle assessment of biogas production through anaerobic co-digestion of nopal cladodes and dairy cow manure [J].
Rafael Ramirez-Arpide, Felix ;
Demirer, Goksel N. ;
Gallegos-Vazquez, Clemente ;
Hernandez-Eugenio, Guadalupe ;
Horacio Santoyo-Cortes, Vinicio ;
Espinosa-Solares, Teodoro .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 172 :2313-2322
[34]   Assessment and multi-objective optimization of a vanadium-chlorine thermochemical cycle integrated with algal biomass gasification for hydrogen and power production [J].
Safari, Farid ;
Dincer, Ibrahim .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 253
[35]   A review and comparative evaluation of thermochemical water splitting cycles for hydrogen production [J].
Safari, Farid ;
Dincer, Ibrahim .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 205
[36]   Exergy studies in water-based and nanofluid-based photovoltaic/thermal collectors: Status and prospects [J].
Shahsavar, Amin ;
Alwaeli, Ali H. A. ;
Azimi, Neda ;
Rostami, Shirin ;
Sopian, Kamaruzzaman ;
Arici, Muslum ;
Estelle, Patrice ;
Nizetic, Sandro ;
Kasaeian, Alibakhsh ;
Ali, Hafiz Muhammad ;
Ma, Zhenjun ;
Afrand, Masoud .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2022, 168
[37]   On the use of different gasification agents in a biomass fueled SOFC by integrated gasifier: A comparative exergo-economic evaluation and optimization [J].
Shayan, E. ;
Zare, V. ;
Mirzaee, I. .
ENERGY, 2019, 171 :1126-1138
[38]   Hydrogen production from biomass gasification; a theoretical comparison of using different gasification agents [J].
Shayan, E. ;
Zare, V. ;
Mirzaee, I. .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 159 :30-41
[39]   Investigation on performance of an integrated SOFC-GE-KC power generation system using gaseous fuel from biomass gasification [J].
Tan, Luzhi ;
Dong, Xiaoming ;
Gong, Zhiqiang ;
Wang, Mingtao .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2017, 107 :448-461
[40]   A comparative study of two SOFC based cogeneration systems fed by municipal solid waste by means of either the gasifier or digester [J].
Yari, Mortaza ;
Mehr, Ali Saberi ;
Mahmoudi, Seyed Mohammad Seyed ;
Santarelli, Massimo .
ENERGY, 2016, 114 :586-602