A comparative investigation of syngas and biofuel power and hydrogen plant combining nanomaterial-supported solid oxide fuel cell with vanadium-chlorine thermochemical cycle

被引:12
作者
Al-Rashed, Abdullah A. A. A. [1 ]
Alsarraf, Jalal [1 ]
Alnaqi, Abdulwahab A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Coll Technol Studies, Dept Automot & Marine Engn Technol, Publ Author Appl Educ & Training, Kuwait, Kuwait
关键词
Algae biomass; SOFC; Biogas and syngas; Hydrogen; Exergy; Nanomaterial; BIOMASS GASIFICATION; INTEGRATED GASIFIER; SYSTEM; SOFC; PERFORMANCE; ENERGY; WASTE; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125910
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
In order to realize combined advantage of hydrogen and renewable energy systems, two new cogeneration of hydrogen and electricity frameworks are developed, examined and compared. The SOFC unit is applied for power production, while its waste heat is suggested to be converted to hydrogen by a thermochemical vanadium -chlorine cycle. As this method requires no electricity input, it is highly preferred to common electrolysis-based techniques for hydrogen production. The systems are fueled by algae biomass converted by either digestion or gasification for provision of biogas or syngas fuels. A theoretical investigation is presented to appraise the sys-tems' practical feasibility according to the violations imposed by thermodynamics' laws. In addition to detailed thermodynamic analyses, exergo-environmental studies are reported to estimate negative impacts of the considered frameworks. Through a sensitivity study, the influence on performance (efficiencies and product generation amounts) of design conditions are comprehensively described. The findings have shown that, generally the biogas-powered framework outperforms the syngas-powered one and the amount of superiority depends on operating conditions, ranging from 3 to 10%. Also, it is found that the syngas-powered system can generate more hydrogen and thus, if the hydrogen production is more significant than power generation the biomass gasification would be preferred over the digestion. The exergy destruction assessment within compo-nents of the two systems has indicated larger values for gasifier compared to digester due to higher rate of chemical reactions and larger temperature differences.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Gasification performance of Spirulina microalgae - A thermodynamic study with tar formation
    Adnan, Muflih A.
    Xiong, Qingang
    Hidayat, Arif
    Hossain, Mohammad M.
    [J]. FUEL, 2019, 241 : 372 - 381
  • [2] Comparative assessment of various chlorine family thermochemical cycles for hydrogen production
    Balta, M. Tolga
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    Hepbasli, Arif
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2016, 41 (19) : 7802 - 7813
  • [3] Thermal characterization of an alkaline electrolysis cell for hydrogen production at atmospheric pressure
    Barco-Burgos, J.
    Eicker, U.
    Saldana-Robles, N.
    Saldana-Robles, A. L.
    Alcantar-Camarena, V
    [J]. FUEL, 2020, 276
  • [4] Part load operation of a SOFC/GT hybrid system: Dynamic analysis
    Barelli, L.
    Bidini, G.
    Ottaviano, A.
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2013, 110 : 173 - 189
  • [5] Baxter D, 2013, WOODHEAD PUBL SER EN, pXXVII
  • [6] Multi-objective optimization of a hybrid biomass-based SOFC/GT/double effect absorption chiller/RO desalination system with CO2 recycle
    Behzadi, A.
    Habibollahzade, A.
    Zare, V.
    Ashjaee, M.
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 181 : 302 - 318
  • [7] A comparative evaluation of alternative optimization strategies for a novel heliostat-driven hydrogen production/injection system coupled with a vanadium chlorine cycle
    Behzadi, Amirmohammad
    Gholamian, Ehsan
    Alirahmi, Seyed Mojtaba
    Nourozi, Behrouz
    Sadrizadeh, Sasan
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 267
  • [8] Biomass fueling of a SOFC by integrated gasifier: Study of the effect of operating conditions on system performance
    Campitelli, Gennaro
    Cordiner, Stefano
    Gautam, Mridul
    Mariani, Alessandro
    Mulone, Vincenzo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2013, 38 (01) : 320 - 327
  • [9] Biorenewable hydrogen production through biomass gasification: A review and future prospects
    Cao, Leichang
    Yu, Iris K. M.
    Xiong, Xinni
    Tsang, Daniel C. W.
    Zhang, Shicheng
    Clark, James H.
    Hu, Changwei
    Ng, Yun Hau
    Shang, Jin
    Ok, Yong Sik
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2020, 186
  • [10] Design analysis and tri-objective optimization of a novel integrated energy system based on two methods for hydrogen production: By using power or waste heat
    Cao, Yan
    Hani, Ehab Hussein Bani
    Mansir, Ibrahim B.
    Safarzadeh, Mehdi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2022, 47 (62) : 26574 - 26588