Osseodensification vs. Conventional Osteotomy: A Case Series with Cone Beam Computed Tomography

被引:3
作者
Costa, Jose Adriano [1 ]
Mendes, Jose Manuel [1 ]
Salazar, Filomena [1 ]
Pacheco, Jose Julio [1 ]
Rompante, Paulo [1 ]
Moreira, Joaquim Ferreira [1 ]
Mesquita, Jose Diogo [2 ]
Adubeiro, Nuno [2 ,3 ,4 ]
da Camara, Marco Infante [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Inst Hlth Sci IUCS CESPU, UNIPRO, Oral Pathol & Rehabil Res Unit, P-4585116 Gandra, Portugal
[2] Polytech Inst Porto ESS IP, Sch Hlth Porto, Dept Radiol, P-4200072 Porto, Portugal
[3] Univ Porto, Inst Publ Hlth, EPIUnit, P-4200072 Porto, Portugal
[4] Lab Integrat & Translat Res Populat Hlth ITR, P-4050600 Porto, Portugal
关键词
osteotomy; cone beam computed tomography; dental implant; bone density; BONE-DENSITY; PRIMARY STABILITY;
D O I
10.3390/jcm13061568
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Osseodensification is a non-extraction technique using specially designed drills to increase bone density while extending an osteotomy, allowing bone to be preserved and condensed by compacting autograft during osteotomy preparation, increasing bone density around implants, and improving mechanical stability. Aim: The objective of this study is to compare conventional osteotomy and osseodensification protocols in implant placement and analyze whether there are differences in bone density. Materials and Methods: Study variables were defined, namely, osseodensification technique, conventional osteotomy technique, bone density, sex, area of location, implant dimensions, implant dimensions, and implant stability. Eligibility and exclusion criteria were defined. A step-by-step surgical protocol was developed. The surgeon and radiologist underwent intra-examiner calibration. A total of 15 patients were selected according to the eligibility criteria, and a total of 41 implants were inserted, 20 implants by conventional osteotomy and 21 by osseodensification. A cone beam computed tomography was performed one year after prosthetic rehabilitation to estimate bone density. Data were collected and recorded, and in the analysis of the association of variables, non-parametric tests were applied. Results: Significant statistical results were found in bone density values, with higher values being obtained with the osseodensification technique, that is, median density values of 1020, and median density values of 732 for the bone drilling technique. The results of the correlation between bone density in both techniques and sex, primary implant stability, implant dimensions and location area were statistically non-significant. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, there are differences in bone density between conventional osteotomy and osseodensification protocols. Bone density is increased with osseodensification over a study period of one year.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Alhamdani F., 2021, J. Med. Res. Health Sci, V4, P1461, DOI [10.52845/JMRHS/2021-4-9-5, DOI 10.52845/JMRHS/2021-4-9-5]
[2]  
Aloorker S, 2022, J Contemp Dent Pract, V23, P162
[3]   Clinical effects of conventional and underprepared drilling preparation of the implant site based on bone density: A systematic review and meta-regression [J].
Antonacci, Donato ;
Del Fabbro, Massimo ;
Bollero, Patrizio ;
Stocchero, Michele ;
Jinno, Yohei ;
Canullo, Luigi .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTIC RESEARCH, 2023, 67 (01) :23-34
[4]   Primary Stability of Three Different Osteotomy Techniques in Medullary Bone: An in Vitro Study [J].
Attanasio, Ferdinando ;
Antonelli, Alessandro ;
Brancaccio, Ylenia ;
Averta, Fiorella ;
Figliuzzi, Michele Mario ;
Fortunato, Leonzio ;
Giudice, Amerigo .
DENTISTRY JOURNAL, 2020, 8 (01)
[5]   Analysis of peri-implant bone defects by using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT): an integrative review [J].
Costa, J. A. ;
Mendes, J. M. ;
Salazar, F. ;
Pacheco, J. J. ;
Rompante, P. ;
Camara, M. I. .
ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2023, 39 (03) :455-466
[6]   Osseodensification outperforms conventional implant subtractive instrumentation: A study in sheep [J].
de Oliveira, Paula G. F. Pessoa ;
Bergamo, Edmara T. P. ;
Neiva, Rodrigo ;
Bonfante, Estevam A. ;
Witek, Lukasz ;
Tovar, Nick ;
Coelho, Paulo G. .
MATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING C-MATERIALS FOR BIOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2018, 90 :300-307
[7]   Influence of Stepped Osteotomy on Primary Stability of Implants Inserted in Low-Density Bone Sites: An In Vitro Study [J].
Degidi, Marco ;
Daprile, Giuseppe ;
Piattelli, Adriano .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2017, 32 (01) :37-41
[8]   Influence of different drilling protocols and bone density on the insertion torque of dental implants [J].
Fernandez-Olavarria, Ana ;
Gutierrez-Corrales, Aida ;
Gonzalez-Martin, Maribel ;
Torres-Lagares, Daniel ;
Torres-Carranza, Eusebio ;
Serrera-Figallo, Maria-angeles .
MEDICINA ORAL PATOLOGIA ORAL Y CIRUGIA BUCAL, 2023, 28 (04) :E385-E394
[9]   Correlation among alveolar bone assessments provided by CBCT, micro-CT, and 14 T MRI [J].
Gil Choi, Isabela Goulart ;
Pinhata-Baptista, Otavio Henrique ;
Ferraco, Renato ;
Kim, Jun Ho ;
Abdala Junior, Reinaldo ;
Arita, Emiko Saito ;
Gonzalez Cortes, Arthur Rodriguez ;
Ackerman, Jerome L. .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 51 (05)
[10]  
Hassan MA, 2021, IOSR J Dent Med Sci., V20, P25