No clinically significant differences in patient-reported outcome measures across total hip arthroplasty approaches

被引:2
作者
Kim, Andrew G. [1 ]
Rizk, Adam A. [1 ]
Chiu, Austin M. [1 ]
Zuke, William [1 ]
Acuna, Alexander J. [1 ]
Kamath, Atul F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Orthopaed Surg, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
关键词
Approach; patient-reported outcome measures; PROM; surgical technique; THA; total hip arthroplasty; DIRECT ANTERIOR APPROACH; SURGICAL APPROACH; LATERAL APPROACH; POSTEROLATERAL APPROACH; FORGOTTEN JOINT; IMPACT; REPLACEMENT; VALIDATION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1177/11207000231178722
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: As recent studies demonstrate an ongoing debate surrounding outcomes and complications with respect to different total hip arthroplasty (THA) approaches, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) may provide valuable information for clinician and patient decision-making. Therefore, our systematic review aimed to assess how surgical approach influences patient-reported outcomes. Methods: 5 online databases were queried for all studies published between January 1, 1997 and March 4, 2022 that reported on PROMs across various surgical approaches to THA. Studies reporting on PROMs in primary THA patients segregated by surgical approach were included. Articles reporting on revision THA, hip resurfacing, and arthroscopy were excluded. Mantel-Haenszel (M-H) models were utilised to calculate the pooled mean difference (MDs) and 95% confidence interval (CIs). Results: No differences between the DAA and other approaches were observed when evaluating HOOS (MD -0.28; 95% CI, -1.98-1.41; p = 0.74), HHS (MD 2.38; 95% CI, -0.27-5.03; p = 0.08), OHS (MD 1.35; 95% CI, -2.00-4.71; p = 0.43), FJS-12 (MD 5.88; 95% CI, -0.36-12.12; p = 0.06), VAS-pain (MD -0.32; 95% CI, -0.68-0.04; p = 0.08), and WOMAC-pain (MD -0.73; 95% CI, -3.85-2.39; p = 0.65) scores. WOMAC (MD 2.47; 95% CI, 0.54-4.40; p = 0.01) and EQ-5D Index (MD 0.03; 95% CI, 0.01-0.06; p = 0.002) scores were found to significantly favour the DAA cohort over the other approaches. Only the EQ-5D index score remained significant following sensitivity analysis. Conclusions: Superiority of any 1 approach could not be concluded based on the mixed findings of the present analysis. Although our pooled analysis found no significant differences in outcomes except for those measured by the EQ-5D index, a few additional metrics, notably the WOMAC, HHS, FJS-12, and VAS-pain scores, leaned in favour of the DAA.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 32
页数:12
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Worse patient-reported outcome after lateral approach than after anterior and posterolateral approach in primary hip arthroplasty [J].
Amlie, Einar ;
Havelin, Leif I. ;
Furnes, Ove ;
Baste, Valborg ;
Nordsletten, Lars ;
Hovik, Oystein ;
Dimmen, Sigbjorn .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2014, 85 (05) :463-469
[2]   The "Forgotten Joint" as the Ultimate Goal in Joint Arthroplasty Validation of a New Patient-Reported Outcome Measure [J].
Behrend, Henrik ;
Giesinger, Karlmeinrad ;
Giesinger, Johannes M. ;
Kuster, Markus S. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2012, 27 (03) :430-436
[3]   No differences between direct anterior and lateral approach for primary total hip arthroplasty related to muscle damage or functional outcome [J].
De Anta-Diaz, Belen ;
Serralta-Gomis, Juan ;
Lizaur-Utrilla, Alejandro ;
Benavidez, Eliana ;
Anacleto Lopez-Prats, Fernando .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2016, 40 (10) :2025-2030
[4]   Patient satisfaction in different approaches for total hip arthroplasty [J].
den Daas, Annick ;
Reitsma, Evelien A. ;
Knobben, Bas A. S. ;
Ten Have, Bas L. E. F. ;
Somford, Matthijs P. .
ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2019, 105 (07) :1277-1282
[5]   INCORPORATING VARIATIONS IN THE QUALITY OF INDIVIDUAL RANDOMIZED TRIALS INTO METAANALYSIS [J].
DETSKY, AS ;
NAYLOR, CD ;
OROURKE, K ;
MCGEER, AJ ;
LABBE, KA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 45 (03) :255-265
[6]   Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty - A qualitative and systematic review of the literature [J].
Ethgen, O ;
Bruyere, O ;
Richy, F ;
Dardennes, C ;
Reginster, JY .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2004, 86A (05) :963-974
[7]   Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Comparison Based on Surgical Approaches [J].
Finch, Daniel J. ;
Martin, Brook I. ;
Franklin, Patricia D. ;
Magder, Laurence S. ;
Pellegrini, Vincent D., Jr. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2020, 35 (04) :1029-+
[8]  
Fransen B, 2016, ACTA ORTHOP BELG, V82, P240
[9]   Patient Reported Outcomes in Orthopaedics [J].
Gagnier, Joel J. .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2017, 35 (10) :2098-2108
[10]   Does surgical approach influence mid- to long-term patient-reported outcomes after primary total hip replacement? A comparison of the 3 main surgical approaches [J].
Galmiche, Romain ;
Poitras, Stephane ;
Dobransky, Johanna ;
Kim, Paul R. ;
Feibel, Robert J. ;
Gofton, Wade ;
Abdelbary, Hesham ;
Beaule, Paul E. .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 63 (02) :E181-E189