Establishing psychological safety in online design-thinking education: a qualitative study

被引:1
作者
Moffett, Jenny [1 ]
Little, Ruth [2 ]
Illing, Jan [1 ]
de Carvalho Filho, Marco Antonio [3 ]
Bok, Harold [4 ]
机构
[1] RCSI Univ Med & Hlth Sci, Hlth Profess Educ Ctr, 123 St Stephens Green, Dublin, Ireland
[2] RCSI Univ Med & Hlth Sci, Sch Med, 123 St Stephens Green, Dublin, Ireland
[3] Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Wenckebach Inst, Fac Med Sci, Hlth Profess Educ Res, Groningen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Utrecht, Fac Vet Med, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Design thinking; Online learning; Online teamwork; Psychological safety; FRAMEWORK; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1007/s10984-023-09474-w
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Design thinking, an approach traditionally used to develop or improve products, services, or processes within design and engineering sectors, has emerged as a novel pedagogical approach. As design thinking becomes more widely established within education contexts, it is important to gain deeper insight as to how such learning environments operate. The aim of this study was to explore online design thinking through the lens of psychological safety. We used a qualitative single-case study design to investigate nine students' experiences across a nine-week design-thinking project. Data were collected via semi-structured interviews and reflective journal entries, and analysed through reflexive thematic analysis. Our findings suggested that psychological safety is a valuable consideration in the design and implementation of online design-thinking learning environments. Facilitators of psychological safety included having collaborative environments, encouraging leadership, and a focus on team formation. Barriers to psychological safety included difficulties connecting, fear of speaking, and cultural considerations. Our findings also highlighted several outcomes of psychologically safe team climates, including creativity, collaboration, and the development of approaches to working with uncertainty.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 197
页数:19
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] Architecture students' satisfaction with and perceptions of online design studios during COVID-19 lockdown: the case of Jordan universities
    Alnusairat, Saba
    Al Maani, Duaa
    Al-Jokhadar, Amer
    [J]. ARCHNET-IJAR INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL RESEARCH, 2021, 15 (01) : 219 - 236
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2011, 15 INT AC MINDTREK C, DOI DOI 10.1145/2181037.2181100
  • [3] Students' learning behaviours and their perception about quality of learning experience: the mediating role of psychological safety
    Ayub, Umer
    Yazdani, Naveed
    Kanwal, Fizza
    [J]. ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 2022, 42 (03) : 398 - 414
  • [4] The importance of design thinking in medical education
    Badwan, Basil
    Bothara, Roshit
    Latijnhouwers, Mieke
    Smithies, Alisdair
    Sandars, John
    [J]. MEDICAL TEACHER, 2018, 40 (04) : 425 - 426
  • [5] Beranek P., 2011, J DISTANCE ED, V25, P1
  • [6] A distributed perspective to the community-of-inquiry framework for distance education
    Biccard, Piera
    [J]. OPEN LEARNING, 2022,
  • [7] Bonk C.J., 2004, Online collaborative learning: Theory and practice, P54, DOI DOI 10.4018/978-1-59140-174-2.CH003
  • [8] Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches
    Braun, Virginia
    Clarke, Victoria
    [J]. COUNSELLING & PSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (01) : 37 - 47
  • [9] Braun Virginia, 2018, APA HDB RES METHODS, P1, DOI [10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6_103-1, 10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4103, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4103, DOI 10.1037/13620-004]
  • [10] Bryceson K., 2007, LEARNING ENVIRON RES, V10, P189, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-007-9028-x, DOI 10.1007/S10984-007-9028-X]