Using flash glucose monitoring in pregnancies in routine care of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus: a pilot study

被引:0
作者
Bastobbe, Sophie [1 ]
Heimann, Yvonne [1 ]
Schleussner, Ekkehard [1 ]
Groten, Tanja [1 ]
Weschenfelder, Friederike [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Jena, Dept Obstet, Klinikum 1, D-07747 Jena, Germany
关键词
Gestational diabetes; Flash glucose monitoring; FGM; SMBG; Treatment; Perinatal outcome; Treatment satisfaction; OBESITY; GDM; HYPERGLYCEMIA; ASSOCIATION; PREVALENCE; MANAGEMENT; GUIDELINE; DIAGNOSIS; LEVEL; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1007/s00592-023-02042-x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
AimFlash glucose monitoring (FGM) has been approved for the care of pregnant women with preexisting diabetes since 2017. However, its use in gestational diabetes (GDM) has been critically discussed. Inaccuracy and missing recommendations for target values are the main arguments against the use of FGM in GDM. To date, there is a lack of data to justify routine use of FGM in GDM pregnancies. Consequently, this new technology has been withheld from GDM-patients. Aim of our pilot study was to analyze the impact of FGM use on pregnancy outcomes, patient's satisfaction and to confirm the safe use in GDM pregnancies.MethodsCohort study of 37 FGM-managed GDM pregnancies compared with 74 matched women using self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). Group comparison using nonparametric testing concerning patients characteristic and perinatal outcome focusing on adverse outcomes (preeclampsia, preterm delivery, large for gestational age, C-sections, neonatal intensive care unit admission, hyperbilirubinemia and hypoglycemia). Evaluation of patient's treatment satisfaction using the "Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire change" (DTSQc) and patient interviews.ResultsNo significant differences in patient's characteristics despite gestational age at diagnosis (FGM with 20 vs. SMBG with 25 weeks). No difference in gestational weight gain, HbA1c progression and perinatal outcome. Treatment satisfaction obtained by the DTSQc revealed a high level of satisfaction with FGM use.ConclusionFGM use was well accepted and did not affect perinatal outcome. Use of FGM during pregnancy is safe and non-inferior to the management with SBGM. FGM should be considered as an option in the management of GDM patients.
引用
收藏
页码:697 / 704
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Diagnostic criteria and classification of hyperglycaemia first detected in pregnancy: A World Health Organization Guideline
    Agarwal, Mukesh M.
    Boulvain, Michel
    Coetzee, Edward
    Colagiuri, Stephen
    Falavigna, Maicon
    Hod, Moshe
    Meltzer, Sara
    Metzger, Boyd
    Omori, Yasue
    Rasa, Ingvars
    Schmidt, Maria Ines
    Seshiah, Veerasamy
    Simmons, David
    Sobngwi, Eugene
    Torloni, Maria Regina
    Yang, Huixia
    Balaji, V.
    Mendis, Shanthi P. B.
    Roglic, Gojka
    Merialdi, Mario
    Betran, Ana Pilar
    Jenum, Anne Karen
    Lao, Terence
    Lopez Stewart, Gloria
    Mikhailov, Anton
    Moses, Robert
    Samad, Noorjahan
    [J]. DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2014, 103 (03) : 341 - 363
  • [2] Women with gestational diabetes mellitus in the ACHOIS trial: Risk factors for shoulder dystocia
    Athukorala, Chaturica
    Crowther, Caroline A.
    Willson, Kristyn
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2007, 47 (01) : 37 - 41
  • [3] The impact of diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes on its prevalence: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Behboudi-Gandevani, Samira
    Amiri, Mina
    Yarandi, Razieh Bidhendi
    Tehrani, Fahimeh Ramezani
    [J]. DIABETOLOGY & METABOLIC SYNDROME, 2019, 11 (1)
  • [4] Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bellamy, Leanne
    Casas, Juan-Pablo
    Hingorani, Aroon D.
    Williams, David
    [J]. LANCET, 2009, 373 (9677) : 1773 - 1779
  • [5] The Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome Study Associations of GDM and obesity with pregnancy outcomes
    Catalano, Patrick M.
    McIntyre, H. David
    Cruickshank, J. Kennedy
    McCance, David R.
    Dyer, Alan R.
    Metzger, Boyd E.
    Lowe, Lynn P.
    Trimble, Elisabeth R.
    Coustan, Donald R.
    Hadden, David R.
    Persson, Bengt
    Hod, Moshe
    Oats, Jeremy J. N.
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2012, 35 (04) : 780 - 786
  • [6] Increased risk of ischemic heart disease, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes in women with previous gestational diabetes mellitus, a target group in general practice for preventive interventions: A population-based cohort study
    Daly, Barbara
    Toulis, Konstantinos A.
    Thomas, Neil
    Gokhale, Krishna
    Martine, James
    Webber, Jonathan
    Keerthy, Deepi
    Jolly, Kate
    Saravanan, Ponnusamy
    Nirantharakumar, Krishnarajah
    [J]. PLOS MEDICINE, 2018, 15 (01)
  • [7] Gestational diabetes mellitus and long-term consequences for mother and offspring: a view from Denmark
    Damm, Peter
    Houshmand-Oeregaard, Azadeh
    Kelstrup, Louise
    Lauenborg, Jeannet
    Mathiesen, Elisabeth R.
    Clausen, Tine D.
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 2016, 59 (07) : 1396 - 1399
  • [8] Flash Glucose Monitoring and Patient Satisfaction: A Meta-Review of Systematic Reviews
    Diez-Fernandez, Ana
    Dolores Rodriguez-Huerta, Maria
    Miron-Gonzalez, Ruben
    Alberto Laredo-Aguilera, Jose
    Maria Martin-Espinosa, Noelia
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (06) : 1 - 13
  • [9] The influence of obesity and diabetes on the prevalence of macrosomia
    Ehrenberg, HM
    Mercer, BM
    Catalano, PM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 191 (03) : 964 - 968
  • [10] Increasing prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus
    Ferrara, Assamrpa
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2007, 30 : S141 - S146