Problematizing partner selection: Collaborative choices and decision-making uncertainty

被引:5
作者
van der Heijden, Machiel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Sch Governance Usg, Room 1-15b,Bijlhouwerstr 6, NL-3511 ZC Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Networks; policy networks; decision making; uncertainty; collaborative governance; NETWORKS; MANAGERIAL; GOVERNANCE; TRUST; CAPACITY; POWER; DETERMINANTS; EXPERIENCE; FRAMEWORK; POLITICS;
D O I
10.1177/09520767221088269
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
Although networked collaboration is often linked to positive outcomes, choosing suitable partners for collaboration can be difficult. Actors often only have limited information about the preferences, capabilities, and trustworthiness of prospective collaborators, meaning that considerable uncertainty may underlie collaborative choices. This article analyses the decision-making uncertainty associated with collaborative choices and assesses factors that potentially mitigate such uncertainty. Based on qualitative research, it presents a conceptual model that brings together and specifies mitigating factors at the network-, organizational, and individual-levels of analysis. The developed conceptual model provides a clearer theoretical understanding and presentation of the cross-level factors important to consider when studying collaborative behaviour. In addition, through its focus on uncertainty, it provides more consideration of the challenges that individual officials face when choosing collaborators in complex networked environments.
引用
收藏
页码:466 / 491
页数:26
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   Inside collaborative networks: Ten lessons for public managers [J].
Agranoff, Robert .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2006, 66 :56-65
[2]  
Ahdieh RB., 2016, LAW CONTEMP PROBL, V78, P75
[3]  
Aldrich H., 1977, ACAD MANAGE REV, V2, P217, DOI [10.2307/257905, DOI 10.5465/AMR.1977.4409044]
[4]   HOW POLITICIANS AND BUREAUCRATS NETWORK: A COMPARISON ACROSS GOVERNMENTS [J].
Alexander, Damon ;
Lewis, Jenny M. ;
Considine, Mark .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2011, 89 (04) :1274-1292
[5]   Self-Organizing Policy Networks: Risk, Partner Selection, and Cooperation in Estuaries [J].
Berardo, Ramiro ;
Scholz, John T. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2010, 54 (03) :632-649
[6]   TIME AND ORGANIZATIONS [J].
BLUEDORN, AC ;
DENHARDT, RB .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1988, 14 (02) :299-320
[7]   Network Analysis in the Social Sciences [J].
Borgatti, Stephen P. ;
Mehra, Ajay ;
Brass, Daniel J. ;
Labianca, Giuseppe .
SCIENCE, 2009, 323 (5916) :892-895
[8]   Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective [J].
Brass, DJ ;
Galaskiewicz, J ;
Greve, HR ;
Tsai, WP .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2004, 47 (06) :795-817
[9]  
Bryan D., 2006, Handbook of public policy, P49, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781848608054.N4
[10]   Explaining Coordination in Collaborative Partnerships and Clarifying the Scope of the Belief Homophily Hypothesis [J].
Calanni, John C. ;
Siddiki, Saba N. ;
Weible, Christopher M. ;
Leach, William D. .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2015, 25 (03) :901-927