Targeted Liberalization: China's foreign investment regulation reform and its post-WTO-accession export surge

被引:0
作者
Liang, Yang [1 ]
Lovely, Mary E. [2 ]
Zhang, Hongsheng [3 ]
机构
[1] San Diego State Univ, Dept Econ, San Diego, CA USA
[2] Peterson Inst Int Econ, Washington, DC 20036 USA
[3] Zhejiang Univ, China Acad Digital Trade, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
China; dynamic difference-in-differences estimates; entry mode; exports; foreign investment policy; IMPORT COMPETITION; TRADE; POLICY; FIRMS;
D O I
10.1111/roie.12737
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
To gain membership in the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2001, China substantially modified its regulation of foreign direct investment. These reforms coincided with rapid changes in the composition of capital inflows, as the dominant entry mode shifted from joint venture to wholly foreign owned affiliate. Foreign-invested enterprises contributed a rising share of China's rapidly growing exports. We investigate how much China's foreign ownership liberalization contributed to these observed trends in foreign investment flows and Chinese exports. Accounting for both the set of activities from which it removed foreign equity caps and those into which it newly encouraged investment, we estimate the impact of China's reforms on firm entry and exports using a difference-in-differences estimator. To eliminate bias resulting from heterogeneous and dynamic treatment effects, we also apply novel dynamic difference-in-differences estimators. We find that removal of foreign equity caps induced entry of wholly foreign owned firms, while having no significant effect on entry of new joint ventures. Concurrently, the designation of new activities for investment incentives induced foreign entry, particularly in the form of joint ventures. Reduced-form calculations imply that FDI policy changes explain almost 9% of the increase in exports from foreign-invested firms over the decade studied. The effect was larger in sectors identified as "high-tech industries" by the Chinese government, as they contribute most of the estimated policy-driven export growth from foreign-invested firms. Thus, China's FDI regulation reform following WTO entry was targeted liberalization: elimination of equity share limits induced new foreign entry, while investment incentives encouraged formation of joint ventures.
引用
收藏
页码:166 / 206
页数:41
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Import Competition and the Great US Employment Sag of the 2000s
    Acemoglu, Daron
    Autor, David
    Dorn, David
    Hanson, Gordon H.
    Price, Brendan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LABOR ECONOMICS, 2016, 34 (01) : S141 - S198
  • [2] Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela
    Aitken, BJ
    Harrison, AE
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1999, 89 (03) : 605 - 618
  • [3] Andrenelli A., 2019, International technology transfer policies
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2002, Foreign direct investment for development
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2018, Findings of the investigation into China's acts, policies, and practices related to technology transfer, intellectual property, and innovation under Section301 of the Trade Act of 1974
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2019, WORLD DEVELOPMENT REPORT 2020: trading for development in the age of global value chains
  • [7] Incomplete contracts and the product cycle
    Antràs, P
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2005, 95 (04) : 1054 - 1073
  • [8] Antràs P, 2014, HBK ECON, P55, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-444-54314-1.00002-1
  • [9] Antras Pol, 2015, Global Production: Firms, Contracts, and Trade Structure
  • [10] The China Syndrome: Local Labor Market Effects of Import Competition in the United States
    Autor, David H.
    Dorn, David
    Hanson, Gordon H.
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2013, 103 (06) : 2121 - 2168