Opinion Dynamics with Preference Matching: How the Desire to Meet Facilitates Opinion Exchange

被引:2
作者
Steinbacher, Mitja [1 ]
Steinbacher, Matjaz [2 ]
Knoppe, Clemens [3 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Inst, Fac Law & Business Studies, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[2] Fund Financing Decommissioning Krsko Nucl Power Pl, Krshko, Slovenia
[3] Univ Kiel, Inst Econ, Kiel, Germany
关键词
Opinion dynamics; Sentiments; Bounded confidence; Matching; Simulation treatments; Agent-based model; Social network; SOCIAL NETWORKS; INFORMATION; CONFIDENCE; STABILITY; ECONOMICS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s10614-023-10455-7
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The paper reexamines an agent-based model of opinion formation under bounded confidence with heterogeneous agents. The paper is novel in that it extends the standard model of opinion dynamics with the assumption that interacting agents share the desire to exchange opinion. In particular, the interaction between agents in the paper is modeled via a dynamic preferential-matching process wherein agents reveal their preferences to meet according to three features: coherence, opinion difference, and agents' positive sentiments towards others. Only preferred matches meet and exchange opinion. Through an extensive series of simulation treatments, it follows that the presence of sentiments, on one hand, hardens the matching process between agents, which leads to less communication. But, on the other hand, it increases the diversity in preferred matches between agents and thereby leads to a better-integrated social network structure, which reflects in a reduction of the opinion variance between agents. Moreover, at combinations of (a) high tolerance, (b) low sensitivity of agents to opinion volatility, and (c) low levels of confidence, agents are occasionally drawn away from the consensus, forming small groups that hold extreme opinions.
引用
收藏
页码:707 / 733
页数:27
相关论文
共 76 条
[61]  
Sotomayor M., 2005, ROOMMATE PROBLEM REV
[62]   Opinion Formation with Imperfect Agents as an Evolutionary Process [J].
Steinbacher, Matjaz ;
Steinbacher, Mitja .
COMPUTATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 53 (02) :479-505
[63]  
Topa Giorgio., 2015, Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, V5, P561, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-444-59517-1.00009-X
[64]   A review on trust propagation and opinion dynamics in social networks and group decision making frameworks [J].
Urena, Raquel ;
Kou, Gang ;
Dong, Yucheng ;
Chiclana, Francisco ;
Herrera-Viedma, Enrique .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2019, 478 :461-475
[65]   Stable Matching for Dynamic Ride-Sharing Systems [J].
Wang, Xing ;
Agatz, Niels ;
Erera, Alan .
TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE, 2018, 52 (04) :850-867
[66]   Quorum decision-making facilitates information transfer in fish shoals [J].
Ward, Ashley J. W. ;
Sumpter, David J. T. ;
Couzin, Lain D. ;
Hart, Paul J. B. ;
Krause, Jens .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2008, 105 (19) :6948-6953
[67]   REASONING ABOUT A RULE [J].
WASON, PC .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1968, 20 :273-&
[68]   Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks [J].
Watts, DJ ;
Strogatz, SH .
NATURE, 1998, 393 (6684) :440-442
[69]   Influentials, networks, and public opinion formation [J].
Watts, Duncan J. ;
Dodds, Peter Sheridan .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2007, 34 (04) :441-458