Opinion Dynamics with Preference Matching: How the Desire to Meet Facilitates Opinion Exchange

被引:2
作者
Steinbacher, Mitja [1 ]
Steinbacher, Matjaz [2 ]
Knoppe, Clemens [3 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Inst, Fac Law & Business Studies, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[2] Fund Financing Decommissioning Krsko Nucl Power Pl, Krshko, Slovenia
[3] Univ Kiel, Inst Econ, Kiel, Germany
关键词
Opinion dynamics; Sentiments; Bounded confidence; Matching; Simulation treatments; Agent-based model; Social network; SOCIAL NETWORKS; INFORMATION; CONFIDENCE; STABILITY; ECONOMICS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s10614-023-10455-7
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The paper reexamines an agent-based model of opinion formation under bounded confidence with heterogeneous agents. The paper is novel in that it extends the standard model of opinion dynamics with the assumption that interacting agents share the desire to exchange opinion. In particular, the interaction between agents in the paper is modeled via a dynamic preferential-matching process wherein agents reveal their preferences to meet according to three features: coherence, opinion difference, and agents' positive sentiments towards others. Only preferred matches meet and exchange opinion. Through an extensive series of simulation treatments, it follows that the presence of sentiments, on one hand, hardens the matching process between agents, which leads to less communication. But, on the other hand, it increases the diversity in preferred matches between agents and thereby leads to a better-integrated social network structure, which reflects in a reduction of the opinion variance between agents. Moreover, at combinations of (a) high tolerance, (b) low sensitivity of agents to opinion volatility, and (c) low levels of confidence, agents are occasionally drawn away from the consensus, forming small groups that hold extreme opinions.
引用
收藏
页码:707 / 733
页数:27
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]   Opinion Fluctuations and Disagreement in Social Networks [J].
Acemoglu, Daron ;
Como, Giacomo ;
Fagnani, Fabio ;
Ozdaglar, Asuman .
MATHEMATICS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2013, 38 (01) :1-27
[2]   Opinion Dynamics and Learning in Social Networks [J].
Acemoglu, Daron ;
Ozdaglar, Asuman .
DYNAMIC GAMES AND APPLICATIONS, 2011, 1 (01) :3-49
[3]   Spread of (mis)information in social networks [J].
Acemoglu, Daron ;
Ozdaglar, Asuman ;
ParandehGheibi, Ali .
GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2010, 70 (02) :194-227
[4]   Consensus Problems on Networks With Antagonistic Interactions [J].
Altafini, Claudio .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2013, 58 (04) :935-946
[5]   Smart Matching Platforms and Heterogeneous Beliefs in Centralized School Choice* [J].
Arteaga, Felipe ;
Kapor, Adam J. ;
Neilson, Ciiristopiier A. ;
Zimmerman, Seth D. .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2022, 137 (03) :1791-1848
[6]   The dissemination of culture - A model with local convergence and global polarization [J].
Axelrod, R .
JOURNAL OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION, 1997, 41 (02) :203-226
[7]   Dynamical affinity in opinion dynamics modeling [J].
Bagnoli, Franco ;
Carletti, Timoteo ;
Fanelli, Duccio ;
Guarino, Alessio ;
Guazzini, Andrea .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2007, 76 (06)
[8]   Emergence of scaling in random networks [J].
Barabási, AL ;
Albert, R .
SCIENCE, 1999, 286 (5439) :509-512
[9]   Layered social influence promotes multiculturality in the Axelrod model [J].
Battiston, Federico ;
Nicosia, Vincenzo ;
Latora, Vito ;
San Miguel, Maxi .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
[10]   On Krause's Multi-Agent Consensus Model With State-Dependent Connectivity [J].
Blondel, Vincent D. ;
Hendrickx, Julien M. ;
Tsitsiklis, John N. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2009, 54 (11) :2586-2597