The 'contract' and its discontents: Can it address protection gaps for migrant agricultural workers in Canada?

被引:3
作者
Basok, Tanya [1 ]
Tucker, Eric M. [2 ]
Vosko, Leah F. [3 ]
Caxaj, C. Susana [4 ]
Hennebry, Jenna L. [5 ]
Mayell, Stephanie [6 ]
McLaughlin, Janet [7 ]
Weiler, Anelyse M. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Windsor, Dept Sociol Anthropol & Criminol, Windsor, ON, Canada
[2] York Univ, Osgoode Hall Law Sch, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] York Univ, Fac Liberal Arts & Profess Studies, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Western Univ, Arthur Labatt Family Sch Nursing, London, ON, Canada
[5] Wilfrid Laurier Univ, Balsillie Sch Int Affairs, Waterloo, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, Dept Anthropol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Wilfrid Laurier Univ, Fac Human & Social Sci, Waterloo, ON, Canada
[8] Univ Victoria, Dept Sociol, Victoria, BC, Canada
关键词
LABOR; HEALTH; DEPORTABILITY; SECURITY; ONTARIO; SAFETY; LAYERS; LIMITS; LEGAL; POWER;
D O I
10.1111/imig.13121
中图分类号
C921 [人口统计学];
学科分类号
摘要
Canada's Seasonal Agricultural Worker Program has often been portrayed as a model for temporary migration programmes. It is largely governed by the Contracts negotiated between Canada and Mexico and Commonwealth Caribbean countries respectively. This article provides a critical analysis of the Contract by examining its structural context and considers the possibilities and limitations for ameliorating it. It outlines formal recommendations that the article co-authors presented during the annual Contract negotiations between Canada and sending states in 2020. The article then explains why these recommendations were not accepted, situating the negotiation process within the structural context that produces migrant workers' vulnerability, on the one hand, and limits the capacity of representatives of sending and receiving states to expand rights and offer stronger protections to migrant farmworkers, on the other hand. We argue that fundamental changes are required to address the vulnerability of migrant agricultural workers. In the absence of structural changes, it is nevertheless important to seek improvements in the regulation of the programme through any means possible, including strengthening the Contract.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 80 条
  • [31] Gesualdi-Fecteau D., 2017, REV QUEBECOISE DROIT, V30, P95, DOI DOI 10.7202/1064679AR
  • [32] Ghosh B., 2012, The New Politics of International Mobility Migration Management and its Discontents, P25
  • [33] Government of Canada, 2020, CAN PROV UPD EX TRAV
  • [34] Government of Canada, 2021, CANADA GAZETTE, V155
  • [35] Government of Mexico, 2019, MEX MIGR POL IS SOV
  • [36] Hanley J, 2019, ELGAR RES AGENDAS, P67
  • [37] Harvey D., 2003, NEW IMPERIALISM, DOI DOI 10.1093/OSO/9780199264315.001.0001
  • [38] Hennebry J., 2012, Permanently temporary? Agricultural migrant workers and their integration in Canada (Rep. No. 26)
  • [39] Out of the Loop: (In)access to Health Care for Migrant Workers in Canada
    Hennebry, Jenna
    McLaughlin, Janet
    Preibisch, Kerry
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION AND INTEGRATION, 2016, 17 (02) : 521 - 538
  • [40] A Model for Managed Migration? Re-Examining Best Practices in Canada's Seasonal Agricultural Worker Program
    Hennebry, Jenna L.
    Preibisch, Kerry
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION, 2012, 50 : e19 - e40