Revisiting live attenuated influenza vaccine efficacy among children in developing countries

被引:1
|
作者
Bagga, Sumedha [1 ]
Krishnan, Anand [2 ]
Dar, Lalit [1 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Microbiol, New Delhi, India
[2] All India Inst Med Sci, Ctr Community Med, New Delhi, India
关键词
Live attenuated influenza vaccine; Developing countries; Pediatric; LAIV efficacy; LAIV effectiveness; T-CELL RESPONSES; SEASONAL INFLUENZA; UNITED-STATES; IMMUNIZATION PRACTICES; ADVISORY-COMMITTEE; YOUNG-CHILDREN; RELATIVE EFFICACY; IMMUNE-RESPONSES; PREVENTION; TRIVALENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.12.058
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Seasonal influenza epidemics cause significant pediatric mortality and morbidity worldwide. Live atten-uated influenza vaccines (LAIVs) can be administered intranasally, induce a broad and robust immune response, demonstrate higher yields during manufacturing as compared to inactivated influenza vaccines (IIVs), and thereby represent an attractive possibility for young children in developing countries. We summarize recent pediatric studies evaluating LAIV efficacy in developing countries where a large pro-portion of the influenza-virus-associated respiratory disease burden occurs. Recently, two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing Russian-backbone trivalent LAIV in children reported contradictory results; vaccine efficacy varied between Bangladesh (41 %) and Senegal (0.0 %) against all influenza viral strains. Prior to 2013, Ann Arbor-based LAIV demonstrated superior efficacy as compared to IIV. However, due to low effectiveness of the Ann Arbor-based LAIV against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09-like viruses, the CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended against the use of LAIV during the 2016-17 and 2017-18 influenza seasons. Reduced replicative fitness of the A(H1N1)pdm09 LAIV strains is thought to have led to the low effectiveness of the Ann-Arbor-based LAIV. Once the A(H1N1) pdm09 component was updated, the ACIP reintroduced the Ann-Arbor-based LAIV as a vaccine choice for the 2018-19 influenza season. In 2021, results from a 2-year RCT evaluating the Russian-backbone trivalent LAIV in rural north India reported that LAIV demonstrated significantly lower efficacy compared to IIV, but in Year 2, the vaccine efficacy for LAIV and IIV was comparable. A profounder understanding of the mechanisms underlying varied efficacy of LAIV in developing countries is warranted. Assessing replicative fitness, in addition to antigenicity, when selecting annual A(H1N1)pdm09 components in the Russian-backbone trivalent LAIVs is essential and may ultimately, enable widespread utility in resource-poor settings.(c) 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1009 / 1017
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine (FluMist®; Fluenz™) A Review of its Use in the Prevention of Seasonal Influenza in Children and Adults
    Carter, Natalie J.
    Curran, Monique P.
    DRUGS, 2011, 71 (12) : 1591 - 1622
  • [32] Safety of guidelines recommending live attenuated influenza vaccine for routine use in children and adolescents with asthma
    Nordin, James D.
    Vazquez-Benitez, Gabriela
    Olsen, Avalow
    Kuckler, Leslie C.
    Gao, Ashley Y.
    Kharbanda, Elyse O.
    VACCINE, 2019, 37 (30) : 4055 - 4060
  • [33] Cost-Effectiveness of Intranasal Live-Attenuated Influenza Vaccine for Children: A Systematic Review
    Chan, Kenneth Sik-Kwan
    Wong, Charlene Hoi-Lam
    Choi, Horace Cheuk-Wai
    VACCINES, 2022, 10 (09)
  • [34] Effectiveness of live attenuated influenza vaccine and inactivated influenza vaccine in children during the 2014-2015 season
    McLean, Huong Q.
    Caspard, Herve
    Griffin, Marie R.
    Poehling, Katherine A.
    Gaglani, Manjusha
    Belongia, Edward A.
    Talbot, H. Keipp
    Peters, Timothy R.
    Murthy, Kempapura
    Ambrose, Christopher S.
    VACCINE, 2017, 35 (20) : 2685 - 2693
  • [35] Impact of Pre-Existing Immunity to Influenza on Live-Attenuated Influenza Vaccine (LAIV) Immunogenicity
    Roy, Sreeja
    Williams, Clare M.
    Wijesundara, Danushka K.
    Furuya, Yoichi
    VACCINES, 2020, 8 (04)
  • [36] Next generation live-attenuated influenza vaccine platforms
    Ullah, Subhan
    Ross, Ted M.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF VACCINES, 2022, 21 (08) : 1097 - 1110
  • [37] Safety of live attenuated influenza vaccine in mild to moderately immunocompromised children with cancer
    Halasa, Natasha
    Englund, Janet A.
    Nachman, Sharon
    Weinberg, Geoffrey A.
    Huber, Victor C.
    Allison, Kim
    Dubovsky, Filip
    Yi, Tingting
    McCullers, Jonathan A.
    Flynn, Patricia M.
    VACCINE, 2011, 29 (24) : 4110 - 4115
  • [38] Live Attenuated Versus Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Hutterite Children A Cluster Randomized Blinded Trial
    Loeb, Mark
    Russell, Margaret L.
    Manning, Vanessa
    Fonseca, Kevin
    Earn, David J. D.
    Horsman, Gregory
    Chokani, Khami
    Vooght, Mark
    Babiuk, Lorne
    Schwartz, Lisa
    Neupane, Binod
    Singh, Pardeep
    Walter, Stephen D.
    Pullenayegum, Eleanor
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 165 (09) : 617 - +
  • [39] The Potential of Live, Attenuated Influenza Vaccine for the Prevention of Influenza in Children
    Belshe, Robert B.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2019, 69 (05) : 795 - 796
  • [40] Association of Prior Vaccination With Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in Children Receiving Live Attenuated or Inactivated Vaccine
    McLean, Huong Q.
    Caspard, Herve
    Griffin, Marie R.
    Gaglani, Manjusha
    Peters, Timothy R.
    Poehling, Katherine A.
    Ambrose, Christopher S.
    Belongia, Edward A.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2018, 1 (06) : e183742