Revisiting live attenuated influenza vaccine efficacy among children in developing countries

被引:1
|
作者
Bagga, Sumedha [1 ]
Krishnan, Anand [2 ]
Dar, Lalit [1 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Microbiol, New Delhi, India
[2] All India Inst Med Sci, Ctr Community Med, New Delhi, India
关键词
Live attenuated influenza vaccine; Developing countries; Pediatric; LAIV efficacy; LAIV effectiveness; T-CELL RESPONSES; SEASONAL INFLUENZA; UNITED-STATES; IMMUNIZATION PRACTICES; ADVISORY-COMMITTEE; YOUNG-CHILDREN; RELATIVE EFFICACY; IMMUNE-RESPONSES; PREVENTION; TRIVALENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.12.058
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Seasonal influenza epidemics cause significant pediatric mortality and morbidity worldwide. Live atten-uated influenza vaccines (LAIVs) can be administered intranasally, induce a broad and robust immune response, demonstrate higher yields during manufacturing as compared to inactivated influenza vaccines (IIVs), and thereby represent an attractive possibility for young children in developing countries. We summarize recent pediatric studies evaluating LAIV efficacy in developing countries where a large pro-portion of the influenza-virus-associated respiratory disease burden occurs. Recently, two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing Russian-backbone trivalent LAIV in children reported contradictory results; vaccine efficacy varied between Bangladesh (41 %) and Senegal (0.0 %) against all influenza viral strains. Prior to 2013, Ann Arbor-based LAIV demonstrated superior efficacy as compared to IIV. However, due to low effectiveness of the Ann Arbor-based LAIV against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09-like viruses, the CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended against the use of LAIV during the 2016-17 and 2017-18 influenza seasons. Reduced replicative fitness of the A(H1N1)pdm09 LAIV strains is thought to have led to the low effectiveness of the Ann-Arbor-based LAIV. Once the A(H1N1) pdm09 component was updated, the ACIP reintroduced the Ann-Arbor-based LAIV as a vaccine choice for the 2018-19 influenza season. In 2021, results from a 2-year RCT evaluating the Russian-backbone trivalent LAIV in rural north India reported that LAIV demonstrated significantly lower efficacy compared to IIV, but in Year 2, the vaccine efficacy for LAIV and IIV was comparable. A profounder understanding of the mechanisms underlying varied efficacy of LAIV in developing countries is warranted. Assessing replicative fitness, in addition to antigenicity, when selecting annual A(H1N1)pdm09 components in the Russian-backbone trivalent LAIVs is essential and may ultimately, enable widespread utility in resource-poor settings.(c) 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1009 / 1017
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Maternal outcomes among pregnant women receiving live attenuated influenza vaccine
    Toback, Seth L.
    Beigi, Richard
    Tennis, Patricia
    Sifakis, Frangiscos
    Calingaert, Brian
    Ambrose, Christopher S.
    INFLUENZA AND OTHER RESPIRATORY VIRUSES, 2012, 6 (01) : 44 - 51
  • [22] Benefits and Risks of Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine in Young Children
    Oster, Gerry
    Weycker, Derek
    Edelsberg, John
    Nichol, Kristin L.
    Klein, Jerome O.
    Belshe, Robert B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE, 2010, 16 (09) : E235 - E244
  • [23] 2015-2016 Vaccine Effectiveness of Live Attenuated and Inactivated Influenza Vaccines in Children in the United States
    Poehling, Katherine A.
    Caspard, Herve
    Peters, Timothy R.
    Belongia, Edward A.
    Congeni, Blaise
    Gaglani, Manjusha
    Griffin, Marie R.
    Irving, Stephanie A.
    Kavathekar, Poornima K.
    McLean, Huong Q.
    Naleway, Allison L.
    Ryan, Kathleen
    Talbot, H. Keipp
    Ambrose, Christopher S.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2018, 66 (05) : 665 - 672
  • [24] Nasal shedding of vaccine viruses after immunization with a Russian-backbone live attenuated influenza vaccine in India
    Dar, Lalit
    Krishnan, Anand
    Kumar, Ramesh
    Dhakad, Shivram
    Choudekar, Avinash
    Bagga, Sumedha
    Sharma, Amrit
    Kumar, Amit
    Jethani, Jyoti
    Saha, Siddhartha
    Amarchand, Ritvik
    Kumar, Rakesh
    Choudhary, Aashish
    Narayan, Venkatesh Vinayak
    Gopal, Giridara
    Lafond, Kathryn E. E.
    Lindstrom, Stephen
    INFLUENZA AND OTHER RESPIRATORY VIRUSES, 2023, 17 (06)
  • [25] The relative efficacy of trivalent live attenuated and inactivated influenza vaccines in children and adults
    Ambrose, Christopher S.
    Levin, Myron J.
    Belshe, Robert B.
    INFLUENZA AND OTHER RESPIRATORY VIRUSES, 2011, 5 (02) : 67 - 75
  • [26] Live attenuated influenza vaccine tetravalent: a clinical review
    Bandell, Allyn R.
    Simoes, Eric A. F.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF VACCINES, 2015, 14 (07) : 963 - 973
  • [27] Urgent challenges in implementing live attenuated influenza vaccine
    Singanayagam, Anika
    Zambon, Maria
    Lalvani, Ajit
    Barclay, Wendy
    LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2018, 18 (01) : E25 - E32
  • [28] Live attenuated influenza vaccine use and safety in children and adults with asthma
    Duffy, Jonathan
    Lewis, Melissa
    Harrington, Theresa
    Baxter, Roger
    Belongia, Edward A.
    Jackson, Lisa A.
    Jacobsen, Steven J.
    Lee, Grace M.
    Naleway, Allison L.
    Nordin, James
    Daley, Matthew F.
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2017, 118 (04) : 439 - 444
  • [29] Asthma exacerbations among asthmatic children receiving live attenuated versus inactivated influenza vaccines
    Ray, G. Thomas
    Lewis, Ned
    Goddard, Kristin
    Ross, Pat
    Duffy, Jonathan
    DeStefano, Frank
    Baxter, Roger
    Klein, Nicola P.
    VACCINE, 2017, 35 (20) : 2668 - 2675
  • [30] Impact of Pre-Existing Immunity and Age on Antibody Responses to Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine
    Hoen, Lukas
    Lartey, Sarah
    Zhou, Fan
    Pathirana, Rishi D.
    Krammer, Florian
    Mohn, Kristin G. -, I
    Cox, Rebecca J.
    Brokstad, Karl A.
    VACCINES, 2024, 12 (08)