A systematic review and meta-analysis of postmastectomy radiation therapy on prepectoral versus subpectoral breast reconstruction

被引:3
|
作者
Zheng, Caihong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu, Jiameng [4 ]
Wen, Yahui [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lin, Shunguo [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Han, Hui [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Xu, Chunsen [2 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Med Univ, Grad Sch, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Fujian Med Univ, Dept Breast Surg, Union Hosp, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Fujian Med Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Union Hosp, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Xiamen Univ, Women & Childrens Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Breast Surg, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[5] Fujian Med Univ, Breast Canc Inst, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY | 2023年 / 9卷
关键词
breast; reconstration; postmastectomy; radiation; prepectoral; subspectral; MASTECTOMY;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2022.1019950
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundPrepectoral breast reconstruction has once again appealed, which attributes to the introduction of acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) and mesh. Postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT), meanwhile, is crucial in the whole course of treatment for breast cancer patients with lymph node-positive. The impact of PMRT on outcomes after prepectoral breast reconstruction has not been clearly defined to date. This study aimed to compare the impact of PMRT on outcomes after prepectoral vs. subpectoral breast reconstruction. MethodsA comprehensive research on databases including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane libraries was performed to retrieve literature pertaining to prepectoral breast reconstruction from database inception to October 2021. All included studies evaluated the impact of PMRT on outcomes after breast reconstruction. Only studies comparing patients who underwent prepectoral breast reconstruction with a control group who underwent subpectoral breast reconstruction were included. Data were analyzed using RevMan version 5.2. ResultsA total of 4 studies were included in the meta-analysis, with a total of 394 breasts. In the setting of postmastectomy radiation therapy, 164 breasts were reconstructed with a prepectoral approach, whereas the remaining 230 breasts underwent subpectoral reconstruction. Overall, outcomes between PBR and SBR was no statistical significance in the overall complications (OR: 1.30, 95% CI: 0.35-4.85), infection (OR: 1.62, 95% CI: 0.90-2.91), seroma (OR: 1.60, 95% CI: 0.48-5.27), skin flap necrosis (OR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.17-3.45), hematoma (OR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.10-1.41), wound dehiscence (OR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.36-1.85). But, included studies lacked data about the patient quality of life and satisfaction with the outcome of the reconstructed breast. ConclusionsIn the setting of postmastectomy radiation therapy, prepectoral breast reconstruction is a safe and effective option.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Breast cancer recurrence after immediate and delayed postmastectomy breast reconstruction-A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bargon, Claudia A.
    Young-Afat, Danny A.
    Ikinci, Mehmet
    Braakenburg, Assa
    Rakhorst, Hinne A.
    Mureau, Marc A. M.
    Verkooijen, Helena M.
    Doeksen, Annemiek
    CANCER, 2022, 128 (19) : 3449 - 3469
  • [42] Outcomes of Immediate versus Delayed Autologous Reconstruction with Postmastectomy Radiation: A Meta-Analysis
    ElAbd, Rawan
    Jabori, Sinan
    Willey, Brea
    El Eter, Leen
    Oberoi, Michelle K.
    Singh, Devinder
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2024, 154 (05) : 851e - 864e
  • [43] Discussion: Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction in the Setting of Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy: An Assessment of Clinical Outcomes and Benefits
    Gabriel, Allen
    Maxwell, G. Patrick
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 143 (01) : 21 - 23
  • [44] Comparison of outcomes following postmastectomy radiation therapy in patients with autologous free flap reconstruction depending on the radiation therapy protocol: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Darras, Osama
    Obeid, Rommy
    Abbas, Fuad
    Ghazoul, Adam
    Frisbie, Sean
    Marlar, Riley
    Phuyal, Diwakar
    Schafer, Rachel
    Gurunian, Raffi
    Bishop, Sarah N.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2024, 99 : 608 - 618
  • [45] SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF DELAYED VERSUS IMMEDIATE AUTOLOGOUS BREAST RECONSTRUCTION IN THE SETTING OF POST-MASTECTOMY RADIATION THERAPY
    Hershenhouse, K. S.
    Bick, K.
    Shauly, O.
    Kondra, K.
    Ye, J.
    Gould, D. J.
    Patel, K. M.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 69 (01) : 290 - 290
  • [46] Two-stage prepectoral breast reconstruction: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis
    Di Giuli, Riccardo
    Cavallero, Mattia F.
    Ferrari, Camilla
    Vaccari, Stefano
    Bucci, Flavio
    Bandi, Valeria
    Klinger, Francesco M.
    Vinci, Valeriano
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2025, 104 : 388 - 397
  • [47] Safety of Tissue Expander/Implant versus Autologous Abdominal Tissue Breast Reconstruction in Postmastectomy Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Tsoi, Bernice
    Ziolkowski, Natalia I.
    Thoma, Achilleas
    Campbell, Kaitryn
    O'Reilly, Daria
    Goeree, Ron
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 133 (02) : 234 - 249
  • [48] Reply: Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction in the Setting of Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy: An Assessment of Clinical Outcomes and Benefits
    Sbitany, Hani
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 144 (05) : 928E - 929E
  • [49] Intraoperative Hypothermia Versus Normothermia in Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Putra, Teuku N.
    Sayudo, Iqbal F.
    Sudarman, Jesica P.
    Krish, Krish
    Vellaichamy, Swathi
    Nadila, Islah
    Filho, Marcilio O.
    THERAPEUTIC HYPOTHERMIA AND TEMPERATURE MANAGEMENT, 2025, 15 (01) : 10 - 16
  • [50] Systematic review and meta-analysis of immediate versus delayed autologous breast reconstruction in the setting of post-mastectomy adjuvant radiation therapy
    Hershenhouse, Korri S.
    Bick, Katherine
    Shauly, Orr
    Kondra, Katelyn
    Ye, Jason
    Gould, Daniel J.
    Patel, Ketan M.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2021, 74 (05): : 931 - 944