A systematic review and meta-analysis of postmastectomy radiation therapy on prepectoral versus subpectoral breast reconstruction

被引:3
|
作者
Zheng, Caihong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu, Jiameng [4 ]
Wen, Yahui [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lin, Shunguo [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Han, Hui [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Xu, Chunsen [2 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Med Univ, Grad Sch, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Fujian Med Univ, Dept Breast Surg, Union Hosp, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Fujian Med Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Union Hosp, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Xiamen Univ, Women & Childrens Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Breast Surg, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[5] Fujian Med Univ, Breast Canc Inst, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY | 2023年 / 9卷
关键词
breast; reconstration; postmastectomy; radiation; prepectoral; subspectral; MASTECTOMY;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2022.1019950
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundPrepectoral breast reconstruction has once again appealed, which attributes to the introduction of acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) and mesh. Postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT), meanwhile, is crucial in the whole course of treatment for breast cancer patients with lymph node-positive. The impact of PMRT on outcomes after prepectoral breast reconstruction has not been clearly defined to date. This study aimed to compare the impact of PMRT on outcomes after prepectoral vs. subpectoral breast reconstruction. MethodsA comprehensive research on databases including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane libraries was performed to retrieve literature pertaining to prepectoral breast reconstruction from database inception to October 2021. All included studies evaluated the impact of PMRT on outcomes after breast reconstruction. Only studies comparing patients who underwent prepectoral breast reconstruction with a control group who underwent subpectoral breast reconstruction were included. Data were analyzed using RevMan version 5.2. ResultsA total of 4 studies were included in the meta-analysis, with a total of 394 breasts. In the setting of postmastectomy radiation therapy, 164 breasts were reconstructed with a prepectoral approach, whereas the remaining 230 breasts underwent subpectoral reconstruction. Overall, outcomes between PBR and SBR was no statistical significance in the overall complications (OR: 1.30, 95% CI: 0.35-4.85), infection (OR: 1.62, 95% CI: 0.90-2.91), seroma (OR: 1.60, 95% CI: 0.48-5.27), skin flap necrosis (OR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.17-3.45), hematoma (OR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.10-1.41), wound dehiscence (OR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.36-1.85). But, included studies lacked data about the patient quality of life and satisfaction with the outcome of the reconstructed breast. ConclusionsIn the setting of postmastectomy radiation therapy, prepectoral breast reconstruction is a safe and effective option.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Postoperative complications of hypofractionated and conventional fractionated radiation therapy in patients with implant-based breast reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Park, Seong-Hyuk
    Yang, Yun-Jung
    Sung, Sihyun
    Choi, Yelim
    Yang, Eun-Jung
    BREAST, 2024, 77
  • [42] Does post-mastectomy radiation therapy worsen outcomes in immediate autologous breast flap reconstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liew, Belle
    Southall, Clea
    Kanapathy, Muholan
    Nikkhah, Dariush
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2021, 74 (12) : 3260 - 3280
  • [43] Impact of Radiation on Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction in Prepectoral Versus Submuscular Planes
    Thuman, Jenna M.
    Worbowtiz, Nestor
    Jain, Abishek
    Ulm, Jason P.
    Delaney, Kevin O.
    Herrera, Fernando A.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2021, 86 (6S) : S560 - S566
  • [44] A Matched-Pair Analysis of Prepectoral with Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction: Is There a Difference in Postoperative Complication Rate?
    Momeni, Arash
    Remington, Austin C.
    Wan, Derrick C.
    Dung Nguyen
    Gurtner, Geoffrey C.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 144 (04) : 801 - 807
  • [45] Use of autologous fat grafting for breast reconstruction: A systematic review with meta-analysis of oncological outcomes
    Agha, Riaz A.
    Fowler, Alexander J.
    Herlin, Christian
    Goodacre, Tim E. E.
    Orgill, Dennis P.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2015, 68 (02) : 143 - 161
  • [46] Autologous Versus Alloplastic Reconstruction for Patients with Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    ElAbd, Rawan
    Prabhu, Neetin
    Alibrahim, Alaa
    Burke, Emily
    Williams, Jason
    Samargandi, Osama
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2022, 46 (02) : 597 - 609
  • [47] Breast conservation versus mastectomy for metaplastic breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Harris, Christopher G.
    Azimi, Farhad
    Chan, Belinda
    Graham, Susannah
    Mak, Cindy
    Warrier, Sanjay
    Eslick, Guy D.
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2025, 21 (02) : 150 - 155
  • [48] Combined breast conservation therapy versus mastectomy for BRCA mutation carriers - A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Davey, M. G.
    Davey, C. M.
    Ryan, E. J.
    Lowery, A. J.
    Kerin, M. J.
    BREAST, 2021, 56 : 26 - 34
  • [49] Unilateral Versus Bilateral Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Tekdogan, Boran
    Martineau, Jerome
    Kalbermatten, Daniel F.
    Oranges, Carlo M.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2024, 12 (12) : e6359
  • [50] Mirror therapy for patients with breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hao, Jie
    Remis, Andreas
    Zhu, Dongqi
    Yao, Yao
    Pu, Yupi
    Li, Yanfei
    Huang, Biying
    BREAST CANCER, 2025, 32 (01) : 60 - 68